16:00:36 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova
16:00:36 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue May 28 16:00:36 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:36 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:36 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:46 <sean-k-mooney> o/
16:00:47 <bauzas> welcome folks
16:00:52 <fwiesel> \o
16:00:53 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:01:04 <bauzas> I missed you last week :)
16:01:16 <sean-k-mooney> aw
16:01:26 <sean-k-mooney> it was quiter without you
16:01:50 <bauzas> :)
16:01:51 <sean-k-mooney> im not sure if we have folks form the us or not today
16:01:59 <bauzas> awaiting a few people before starting
16:02:02 <dansmith> o/
16:02:17 <elodilles> o/
16:02:28 <bauzas> okay, let's start
16:02:34 <bauzas> shall be quick
16:02:42 <bauzas> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:47 <bauzas> #info No Critical bug
16:02:51 <gibi> o/
16:02:52 <bauzas> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:03:07 <bauzas> I can try to dent at some new bugs next week
16:03:24 <bauzas> apart from that, anything to discuss about bugs ?
16:04:01 <gibi> I saw https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2061701 happening in my Antelope env
16:04:13 <gibi> it is strange it really happen only once
16:04:32 <bauzas> huh
16:04:58 <gibi> I will try to dig into it a bit later this week
16:05:13 <bauzas> okay
16:05:15 <gibi> But if it rings a bell for someone then ping me
16:05:33 <bauzas> okay
16:06:15 <bauzas> moving on ?
16:06:23 <elodilles> gibi: i remember some discussion about this will hit us in the future... but nothing more o:)
16:06:33 <elodilles> maybe future is now :)
16:06:45 * gibi needs a timemachine
16:07:11 <bauzas> lol
16:07:23 <bauzas> #topic Gate status
16:07:24 <sean-k-mooney> that bug would imply someone is using config_drive with vfat?
16:07:30 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:07:36 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:07:44 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:07:59 <sean-k-mooney> oh no an ephmeral disk with the encyption format set to vfat which i think is the default
16:08:00 <bauzas> (all greens except nova-emulation for zed )
16:08:13 <bauzas> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:08:20 <bauzas> #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck
16:08:23 <bauzas> voila
16:08:59 <bauzas> about the bug, we can continue to discuss about it on the open discussion section :)
16:09:06 <bauzas> #topic Release Planning
16:09:10 <bauzas> #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html
16:09:23 <bauzas> #info nova deadlines are now there ^
16:09:31 <bauzas> #info Dalmatian-2 in 5 weeks
16:09:37 <bauzas> that's it
16:10:05 <bauzas> moving on
16:10:13 <bauzas> #topic Review priorities
16:10:19 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status
16:10:38 <bauzas> you can now look at it
16:10:53 <bauzas> I provided all the series for all the specs that were accepted
16:11:15 <bauzas> we also have a few bugfixes for CI and other stuff in there
16:11:42 <bauzas> fwiw, I'll continue to review some of the series
16:12:38 <bauzas> #topic Stable Branches
16:12:41 <bauzas> elodilles: your time
16:12:55 <elodilles> i haven't seen much activity in stable/202*.* branches, but last time their gate were OK, so hopefully they are in the same state
16:13:21 <elodilles> that's all from me
16:13:30 <elodilles> about stable.
16:15:01 <bauzas> ++
16:15:13 <bauzas> #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:15:18 <bauzas> fwiesel: anything to say ?
16:15:19 <fwiesel> #info Hand-Over to operations of CI required some (internal) migration. Working on backlog jobs.
16:15:38 <fwiesel> So, if you see delays, that's the reason.
16:15:54 <fwiesel> Any questions?
16:16:01 <bauzas> not from me
16:16:58 <fwiesel> Okay, then that's from my side. Hopefully that is done soon, and I can focus on the bugs again.
16:17:20 <bauzas> ++
16:17:31 <bauzas> #topic Open discussion
16:17:41 <bauzas> nothing on the agenda
16:17:46 <bauzas> anything anyone ?
16:19:05 <bauzas> looks not
16:19:18 <bauzas> sean-k-mooney: gibi: want to continue discussion the vfat bug ?
16:19:26 <bauzas> or, can we close ?
16:19:58 <sean-k-mooney> we can close im updating the bug with some comments
16:20:28 <bauzas> ++
16:20:33 <bauzas> thanks all then
16:20:37 <bauzas> #endmeeting