16:00:05 <bauzas__> #startmeeting nova
16:00:05 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jul 23 16:00:05 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas__. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:05 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:05 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:12 <bauzas__> hey folks
16:00:24 <tkajinam> o/
16:00:29 <bauzas__> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:00:41 * gibi lurks a bit
16:00:48 <bauzas__> sorry, have unstable internet connection at home
16:00:50 <fwiesel> o/
16:01:07 <bauzas__> let's try to make this meeting quick for a reason we'll discuss in a sec
16:01:12 <sean-k-mooney> o/
16:01:25 <bauzas__> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:01:36 <bauzas__> #info One Critical bug
16:01:47 <bauzas__> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2071734
16:02:02 <bauzas__> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:02:12 <bauzas__> so, voila we have another CVE fix
16:02:30 <bauzas__> do people want to discuss about it ?
16:02:58 <bauzas__> if not, I have a question
16:04:00 <bauzas__> given the problem with the image module, should we working on it this cycle ?
16:04:06 <bauzas__> if so, it would be a priority
16:04:44 <sean-k-mooney> there may be more work we do to harden it but likely we will need to take a step back and do tha tnext cycle
16:05:05 <sean-k-mooney> this cycle we may do so prep work or adtopation with the moving of the code to oslo
16:05:34 <sean-k-mooney> i know dan cant attend today and he has some tought on this topic
16:05:40 <sean-k-mooney> so we can bring it up again next week
16:05:56 <bauzas__> then at least we should maybe stop to merge new changes for that module
16:06:01 <bauzas__> unless it's a priority
16:06:38 <bauzas__> the more we accept, the more it could be difficult for the oslo usage
16:06:49 <bauzas__> is dansmith around ?
16:08:03 <tkajinam> are you talking about the image module in oslo or one in nova ?
16:08:41 <sean-k-mooney> bauzas__: no they are away for the next while
16:08:45 <sean-k-mooney> tkajinam: the one in nova
16:09:04 <bauzas__> tkajinam: we want to move the module to oslo
16:09:19 <sean-k-mooney> yep so until that happens we likely shoudl stablise it
16:09:47 <sean-k-mooney> we dont wnat to have them diverge more while we are porting
16:09:55 <bauzas__> if we don't have quorum for now, then let's disucss this next week
16:10:01 <sean-k-mooney> +1
16:10:02 <bauzas__> moving on then
16:10:32 <tkajinam> ok then I'll try to follow the discussion before I do +2+A actual implementations
16:10:41 <bauzas__> #topic Gate status
16:11:04 <bauzas__> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:11:16 <bauzas__> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:11:24 <bauzas__> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:11:43 <bauzas__> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/build/132eaea6e65c41a1a508163b9c1f82b2 tempest-integrated-placement FAILURE on unmaintained/zed branch
16:11:51 <bauzas__> I just looked at it ^
16:12:20 <bauzas__> this is just a problem when creating dbcounter
16:12:40 <bauzas__> hopefully the next run won't have problems
16:12:59 <bauzas__> so unless someone finds something for this job run, let's continue
16:13:55 <bauzas__> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:14:08 <bauzas__> #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck
16:14:19 <bauzas__> anything else about the gate ?
16:14:24 <frickler> ah, is that the setuptools issue? I think nova was having something similar
16:14:39 <bauzas__> frickler: yeah looks to me
16:15:16 <frickler> fix should be https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/924740 then, but maybe also dansmith will have some other idea
16:16:25 <bauzas__> ack but this is for zed
16:16:47 <bauzas__> as said, this branch is "unmaintained"
16:16:55 <bauzas__> anyway, moving on
16:17:07 <bauzas__> #topic Release Planning
16:17:18 <bauzas__> #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html
16:17:28 <bauzas__> #info Dalmatian-3 in 5 weeks
16:17:34 <bauzas__> #info Spec approval freeze happened
16:17:45 <bauzas__> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/2024.2 16 approved blueprints
16:18:03 <bauzas__> you can see all of them here ^
16:18:12 <bauzas__> anything else to discuss ?
16:18:34 <bauzas__> #topic Review priorities
16:18:42 <bauzas__> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status
16:18:51 <bauzas__> all of the approved blueprint series are there ^
16:19:29 <bauzas__> #topic Stable Branches
16:19:38 <bauzas__> elodilles is on PTO this week
16:19:46 <bauzas__> so let's discuss that topic next week
16:19:55 <bauzas__> #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:20:00 <fwiesel> #info No updates.
16:20:02 <bauzas__> fwiesel: anything to report ?
16:20:04 <bauzas__> cool
16:20:07 <bauzas__> moving on then
16:20:14 <bauzas__> #topic Open discussion
16:20:18 <bauzas__> I have one item
16:20:23 <bauzas__> (bauzas) Aug 6, 13 and 20 nova meetings
16:20:29 <bauzas__> I'll be on PTO those weeks
16:20:40 <bauzas__> if someone wants to run them, cool
16:20:58 <bauzas__> if not, I gonna skip those
16:22:02 <sean-k-mooney> we proably shoudl keep them but we dont need to decied that now
16:22:06 <bauzas__> okay, I'll tell about that again next week
16:22:12 <bauzas__> that's it for me
16:22:23 <weanew> Hi! I've submitted a patch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/923395 Could someone take a look at it please?
16:22:25 <bauzas__> anything else people want to discuss ?
16:22:47 <bauzas__> weanew: we try to avoid review requests during nova meetings
16:22:59 <sean-k-mooney> that is a pretty old bug
16:23:15 <sean-k-mooney> and im not sure its one we really want to fix
16:24:02 <sean-k-mooney> i dont have time today to review but it will depend on the perfomace impact of the fix
16:24:11 <sean-k-mooney> we proably dot want to downcall to all cells for example
16:25:47 <sean-k-mooney> with that said ill try and review it properly in the next few days
16:26:02 <sean-k-mooney> if there is nothign else i think we can close the meeting
16:26:41 <weanew> Thank you, I don't have quations
16:26:57 <bauzas__> cool
16:27:04 <bauzas__> then we can close this meeting
16:27:06 <bauzas__> thanks all
16:27:09 <bauzas__> #endmeeting