00:00:17 #startmeeting nova api 00:00:18 Meeting started Fri Aug 22 00:00:17 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cyeoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 00:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 00:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_api' 00:00:31 Hi anyone here for the Nova API meeting? 00:01:23 hi 00:01:40 hey wasn't sure if anyone would turn up because I forgot to send the reminder email :-) 00:01:57 gmann will join 00:02:06 hi 00:02:11 hi! 00:02:49 ok I guess we should get started 00:03:05 So we're in feature proposal freeze now 00:03:20 looks like we have patches up for everything from the first section and most of the second which is good 00:03:44 just a matter of getting them merged over the next couple of weeks before feature freeze.... 00:04:08 yea, that is very important.. 00:04:26 we need to get enough reviews for doing it. 00:04:56 yep, I'll start spending more time reviewing them 00:05:25 we'll need to make sure we respond quickly to review feedback as no doubt the gate will get blocked up pretty quickly 00:05:50 any general concerns about the patches so far - eg something that people are commonly doing wrong? 00:06:25 so no new patches for missing plugins etc 00:06:38 for J 00:07:27 I guess we already proposed all patches. 00:07:34 for juno. 00:07:50 gmann: well we can still try to get a feature proposal exception for at least the next week 00:08:30 ohk 00:08:31 looks like there's only 2-3 in the second section on the etherpad 00:08:50 and then all the nova-network/network related ones in the 3rd section 00:09:05 ya 00:09:11 but I *think* we have enough up now if it merges that we can tempest (eg we have images and volumes) 00:09:49 I'd like to try applying all patches into my local environment and try tempest against it for checking all patches. 00:10:09 oh good idea! 00:10:19 oomichi: it will be great. 00:10:42 ok, will do it today if there is not the other important tasks. 00:11:37 still can we propose new patches today? 00:11:41 I've put up sort of a strawman patch for extension_info, interested in any thoughts that people may have https://review.openstack.org/115848 00:11:50 oomichi: well its still Thursday 29th in the US :_) 00:11:55 so I say yes! 00:12:06 thu 21st I mean 00:12:42 cyeoh: thanks, that is nice :-) 00:13:38 So I didn't have anything else on my list to talk about. Does anyone else have anything they'd like to discuss? 00:13:59 one point. 00:14:32 jsonschema patches also still exist in gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/v3-api-schema,n,z 00:14:52 you'll just need to adapt them to v2.1 now? 00:15:09 yea, that is nice point. 00:15:26 that is a race. 00:15:42 yea - could you rebase them on top of the v3->v2 conversion patches? 00:15:58 and then we can merge them in the next couple of weeks if we get the bandwidth 00:16:19 nice idea, I got it. 00:16:35 I will -1 for doing that :P 00:16:57 and will update my patches for v2.1 00:17:11 cool - and also please feel free to bug me on irc for reviews of patches - esp ones which have one +2 already. Even if I"m not around I'll see it later from my irc proxy 00:17:56 cyeoh: thanks so much! 00:18:35 np - the sooner we start merging the patches the better. Anyone have anything else? 00:18:50 great, nothing from me :) 00:18:55 one review 00:18:59 image ref patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114427/) is approved but waiting for admin pass patch to get approve- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114177/2 00:19:17 those patches are base patch for many 00:19:33 it will nice if those can be merged soon 00:20:00 gmann: oh good point - we should concentrate reviews on the admin pass patch and servers too - because that also has lots of dependencies 00:20:05 yea, nice point. 00:20:22 I will review it soon after this. 00:20:27 me too :-) 00:20:36 cyeoh: great! 00:20:49 Thanks cyeoh, oomichi 00:21:11 gmann: did you have anything else you wanted to bring up? 00:21:19 one last point about V2.1 tempest 00:21:26 For tempest tests implementation for V2.1, do we need those in J or afterward when V2.1 become stable (as per tempest policy) 00:22:06 gmann: I assume we'll point the v2 tests at /v3 - maybe can just run an experimental job 00:22:42 but it doesn't need to be gating by Juno 00:22:52 yea, that is true. and I guess we need to change current v3 experimental tests for v2.1. 00:23:04 pretty sure we'll be spending some time in kilo debugging 00:24:03 ok. 00:24:35 so we can think about parallel V2 and V2.1 gating later 00:25:06 gmann: yes - it'll work similar to how we used to be gatting v2 and v3 in parallel 00:25:19 sounds good 00:25:20 gmann: agree. 00:25:33 but we'll wait till we're pretty confident that everything is good with it (before we move from experimental to gating) 00:25:48 true 00:26:29 ok I think that's it for this week - thanks for turning up even though I forgot to send out the email! 00:26:51 thanks! 00:26:56 Thanks all :) 00:27:23 #endmeeting