13:00:12 #startmeeting nova api 13:00:13 Meeting started Wed Sep 7 13:00:12 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alex_xu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:16 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_api' 13:00:21 who is here today? 13:00:43 hi 13:00:52 gmann: welcome back 13:01:03 alex_xu: thanks 13:01:32 o/ 13:01:36 o/ 13:01:38 \o 13:02:04 ok, let us start the meeting 13:02:21 after freeze, I think only two things, api-ref and bug fix. 13:02:45 where did we end up with the policy patches? 13:03:03 I think we are done 13:03:14 I was focussed on the placement side, so wasn't sure if those 2 outstanding patches made it in 13:03:21 o/ 13:03:26 sdague: do you want to merge this devstack change https://review.openstack.org/360943, or you just want it as a test? 13:03:41 alex_xu: I just wanted it as a test 13:04:02 sdague: ok, I will close that patch 13:04:08 #link https://review.openstack.org/356963 13:04:25 alex_xu: ok, great 13:04:29 http://logs.openstack.org/43/360943/3/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ubuntu-xenial/fdd2590/logs/screen-n-api.txt.gz?level=WARNING#_2016-08-29_15_15_52_844 right, looks good 13:04:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/322944 13:04:57 the last two patches we merged before freeze 13:05:05 sdague: alex_xu what is call on existing user_id things. - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/user_id_based_policy_enforcement 13:05:19 decide later in O and leave as it is as of now? 13:06:12 gmann: the answer is the patch https://review.openstack.org/356963 13:06:47 gmann: we won't existed the user_id support, but emit a warning when user use it 13:06:55 ohk, so we keep those one also and remove in future all together 13:07:09 gmann: yes, I think so 13:07:52 yea make sense. to avoid any last moment breaking any of user 13:07:57 gmann: right 13:08:00 i will abandone those 13:08:10 o/ 13:08:15 on the up side, at the ops summit 0 people there were using this kind of policy 13:08:56 oh then why on ML it was so much noice :) 13:09:05 heh 13:09:35 it was mostly CERN 13:09:53 they didn't come to ops summit this time 13:10:16 humm 13:10:44 anyway, we should move on. Like alex_xu said, I think we're good here 13:10:48 alex_xu: thanks for the update 13:10:52 for api-ref, sdague do you have any plan? 13:10:55 sdague: np 13:10:55 yea 13:11:12 alex_xu: I need to organize a final sprint 13:11:21 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/api-ref-in-rst 13:11:27 #link http://burndown.dague.org/ 13:11:36 I was waiting until I felt like we were sure that any FFE items are sorted 13:11:44 sdague: ok, cool 13:11:57 there are still chunks of placement API outstanding that we need to land 13:12:16 sdague: yea, +1 for placement API stuff 13:12:34 sdague: may be considering QA mid cycle (19th week) 13:12:57 (19-21th sept) 13:13:19 gmann: that might be a reasonable week. I'm not going there, so I'll be at home to do content and reviews 13:14:11 there is bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1609039, which mentioned by Matt, that is agreement on the Mid-cycle 13:14:11 Launchpad bug 1609039 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Should not be able to sort instances based on joined tables" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Zhenyu Zheng (zhengzhenyu) 13:14:14 sdague: ohh, then i will start before that as whole week i will be there 13:14:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359134/ 13:14:42 Kevin_Zheng is helping on the fix 13:15:50 probably need some feedback 13:16:16 gmann: ok, I can push it back a week 13:16:39 sdague: nice, Thanks 13:19:25 ok, this is the only one I noticed, any more buys worth to notice? 13:19:53 not from I 13:20:04 s/buys/bugs/ 13:20:13 ok 13:20:33 people should probably start thinking about what major priorities we should push on for the API in the next cycle 13:20:42 I have one back-port https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364613/, anyway, I just need push some stable core to review. 13:20:43 I think the 2 priority model worked quite well this cycle 13:21:02 and we should probably continue to try that going forward 13:21:15 yea 13:21:38 yea 13:22:13 but lets hold off a couple weeks talking about that 13:22:20 because there are still the release and bugs front 13:22:25 agree 13:22:27 +1 13:22:41 yea, that will be good 13:22:53 jichen: you still have a -1 on this patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359134/ how do we resolve that? 13:23:20 I will take a look at Kevin's response 13:23:39 jichen: I think your comments are good 13:23:50 I'm surprised Kevin_Zheng hasn't respun the patch yet 13:24:38 I will ping Kevin_Zheng tomorrow 13:24:45 alex_xu: thanks 13:24:51 sdague: np 13:26:33 so anything more? 13:27:28 not from me 13:27:36 nothing from my side 13:27:48 I guess we should just take a look through - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=api and figure out if there are issues we should land for the release 13:27:55 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347544/3 is a pretty easy one 13:28:43 sdague: yea, agree 13:28:53 that is nice 13:29:42 ok, I guess that is all for today 13:29:53 thanks all! let us back to work 13:30:04 #endmeeting