17:00:45 #startmeeting nova_cells 17:00:46 Meeting started Wed Mar 25 17:00:45 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alaski. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:48 argh 17:00:50 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells' 17:01:06 o/ 17:01:11 anyone here for cells? 17:01:17 o/ 17:02:09 cool 17:02:17 #topic Tempest testing 17:02:42 I looked earlier and saw 11 failures 17:02:55 10 for the hypervisor extension, and 1 for tenant_networks 17:03:12 I have https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166396/ up for adjusting the regressions list 17:03:18 alaski: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167564/ removes the hypervisor ones 17:03:54 melwitt: nice, I missed that in my review list 17:03:56 It shows 3 failures - one the tenant network ones and two which _might_ be transient, related to authentication or something 17:04:29 hi all.. 17:04:42 dheeraj-gupta-4: great 17:05:15 I know bauzas is working on some PCI/RT failures right now, and then hopefully we can get this series moving again 17:05:17 hm, I didn't realize the hypervisor thing was fixable. I thought the problem was tempest trying to show hypervisor by name without cell path? 17:05:56 melwitt: Actually it was nova-api trying to route messages to hosts without cell path 17:06:05 so even nova hypervisor-show was failing 17:06:21 or even nova-hypervisor-list 17:06:57 list should work, but show won't work if tempest doesn't pass a full cell path 17:07:43 I haven't looked at the tests though. if it's using the results of list it should be workable 17:07:53 much more I have to learn about cells... 17:08:13 I'll update my regressions patch and make it depend on yours 17:08:44 melwitt: can you update the regex in etherpad, whcih is to be used? 17:08:49 alaski: The problem was Service.get_by_compute_host(host) where host is not cell aware, so everything stalls 17:09:42 dheeraj-gupta-4: okay. I need to go through that series yet again and make sure I have it all straight 17:09:54 anything more on testing? 17:10:12 the container test failures appear transient fwiw 17:10:16 sometimes I see them fail, sometimes not 17:10:35 I wonder if that just affects the cells job for some reason 17:10:38 (in checking various tempest cells jobs) 17:11:28 might be something we need to look into before we thing about voting 17:11:37 s/thing/think/ 17:11:47 moving on 17:11:54 #topic Specs 17:12:07 I've revived the old specs as a start 17:12:12 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141486/ 17:12:17 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136490/ 17:12:32 alaski: sorry, missed the beginning, on something else :/ 17:12:37 The scheduling one needs to be split out, but I've been a bit behind 17:12:46 bauzas: I know, no worries 17:13:45 so reviews are welcome, but more specs will be coming 17:14:29 #topic Summit topics 17:15:05 we should start thinking about what would be good to discuss at the summit 17:15:42 alaski: we don't know yet the formal agenda for Nova 17:16:04 sure. but we should be ready to propose things 17:16:12 alaski: I mean, how long we will have sessions vs. brainstorm 17:16:34 alaski: and if we'll have sessions, but sure we can begin to think about 17:16:37 I though it was the same as Paris? 17:17:00 alaski: I can ask ttx about at least if there is any cross-project day 17:17:23 alaski: and we could bug mikal for the Nova specific ratio of sessions vs. roundtable 17:17:29 well, either way we'll want to discuss things 17:17:36 100% agreed 17:17:50 I think it would be good to have a goal for L in mind 17:18:09 so we can focus on what we'll need to achieve that 17:19:12 I would like to propose a goal of a single cell setup which can boot an instance 17:19:24 very basic, no frills 17:20:22 but let's think on it and discuss here or in a future meeting 17:21:20 #topic Open Discussion 17:21:45 anything anyone would like to discuss? 17:22:53 vineetmenon: about the regex, the one on the etherpad is the one I use. adding the regressions to it would defeat my purpose of finding out which ones should be in the list 17:23:56 melwitt, okay.. i'll use the same then. 17:24:15 i had some count mismatch a few weeks ago with yours.. 17:24:21 hence, asked 17:25:55 cool 17:26:10 seems like we have some reviews to look at for testing 17:26:30 and time to start thinking about what to work on next 17:26:43 if nothing else we'll close up early 17:26:48 back :) 17:26:55 just when you're closing :) 17:27:03 heh, anything to add? 17:27:06 nice timing :P 17:27:21 not really, I have a few patches waiting to be reviewed but that's fine, saw the log 17:27:52 ok. I'll take a look at those soon 17:28:04 thanks everyone! 17:28:08 cool 17:28:10 byez 17:28:12 #endmeeting