17:00:15 #startmeeting nova_cells 17:00:16 Meeting started Wed Jul 15 17:00:15 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alaski. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells' 17:00:31 anyone around today? 17:00:37 o/ 17:01:09 heh, going to be quick today 17:01:16 #topic Tempest testing 17:01:22 o/ 17:01:28 melwitt: anything newsworthy on testing? 17:02:19 alaski: nope. things are in the same state goo.gl/b7R8wq (stable) except for the gate issues yesterday 17:02:39 great 17:02:53 melwitt: you mean the issue that was reverted, right? 17:03:13 alaski: yes, I think so 17:03:35 okay 17:04:06 if you aren't aware of anything specific that's different we'll assume it's that 17:04:15 #topic Specs 17:04:31 nothing here except to say that at this point it's probably too late to open more 17:04:56 but there is still work to be done on open specs 17:05:02 #topic open discussion 17:05:24 I'm going to recommend that we skip this meeting next week 17:05:54 um, yeah 17:05:54 if someone objects and wants to run the meeting that's fine, otherwise we'll skip 17:06:05 I'm +1 on skipping 17:06:26 cool 17:07:01 I've been sidetracked for a bit on internal work but am finally starting to get back to some coding for cells 17:07:20 it's quite unfortunate that it's this late and I'm just getting back to it 17:07:21 +1 17:07:39 just one comment.. 17:07:58 belmiro has uploaded first patch for flavors bp 17:08:09 belmoreira, ^ 17:08:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201606/2 17:08:43 I saw that go up, but haven't looked closely at it yet 17:08:52 thanks alaski 17:08:55 yeah, I'm not sure what I can do right now. the db connection switching bp was approved recently and I'll refresh Dheeraj's patch on that and add to it. other than that, I don't know 17:08:58 for the link 17:09:57 melwitt: a lot of the work was going to be around scheduling and the instance boot flow, but that's been stuck behind request spec object work 17:10:29 I'm working on the persistence side of that now, but the object is still up for review 17:10:46 this series https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145528/ 17:11:09 alaski: right. I should review that. what about the cells conductor, is that considered part of scheduling? 17:11:27 sort of 17:11:38 the work can be done independently, but assumes the object is there 17:11:53 okay 17:11:55 so it will be harder to test, but could be coded 17:12:55 melwitt: do you want to get started on that? 17:14:03 anything else anyone wants to discuss today? 17:14:28 alaski: oh, I was just asking to get more idea of how things fit together. since nothing is existing yet. I'd be interested but to be honest not sure I'd know what to do about it yet 17:15:05 melwitt: okay, let me see where I can get to this week on the spec object and we can talk next week 17:15:20 alaski: okay, cool 17:15:51 seems like there's nothing else 17:15:55 thanks everyone 17:15:59 #endmeeting