17:01:02 #startmeeting nova_cells 17:01:03 Meeting started Wed Nov 18 17:01:02 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alaski. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:01:06 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells' 17:01:23 anyone around today? 17:01:26 not me 17:01:31 oh wait 17:01:31 o/ 17:01:34 o/ 17:01:39 o/ 17:01:57 #topic Testing 17:02:16 melwitt: anything you're aware of in this area? 17:02:37 I have an almost testing-related thing 17:02:41 no, but I haven't been looking at it lately (sorry) 17:03:01 melwitt: no worries. if trouble hasn't found you that's probably good 17:03:06 dansmith: go for it 17:03:21 :) 17:03:27 I've got the reno for the api database proposed, which is hung up on a string of deps in infra land 17:03:31 and has been for a week 17:03:36 but after those are resolved, 17:03:50 the grenade patch to actually do that thing is passing and can be approved when the release note lands 17:03:58 so, not testing, but almost testing :) 17:04:08 heh 17:04:09 dansmith: great 17:04:11 that's great 17:04:28 no 17:04:31 it's almost great :) 17:04:37 that will allow us to recheck the flavor code 17:04:55 belmoreira: right 17:05:01 which I need to go review and lay some hate on 17:05:11 anyone have the link to that handy? 17:05:14 * bauzas waves late 17:05:15 I'll go do that after this meeting 17:05:15 hah 17:05:29 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201606/ 17:05:40 well, more the followup patch 17:05:59 so I'll manually test the reno patch and +W 17:06:16 bauzas: cool 17:06:16 I don't want to have it waiting for something which could come up later 17:06:19 bauzas: I already depends-on'd it 17:06:58 dansmith: honestly, it could take yet a few days before having the infra patch merged 17:07:06 dansmith: so it's your call 17:07:16 a few days seems fine 17:07:22 dansmith: but like I said, I can act as a jenkins guy if needed 17:07:46 we might also just ask the grenade people to land it because the reno is in progress 17:07:50 call me hudson 17:07:53 anyway, not a big deal methinks 17:08:06 yeah. if it stretches to weeks that might be a problem 17:08:27 sdague: thoughts? 17:08:27 but if it's moving now it seems good 17:08:52 sdague: we can't land the grenade patch before the reno for it, which is stuck in dep hell. Can we just land the grenade patch knowing we'll land the reno as soon as it can? 17:09:03 sdague: or we can land the reno untested 17:09:13 well, tested locally 17:09:15 'trust me' 17:09:16 :D 17:09:23 heh 17:09:34 alaski: whatever, we can move on, I'll pursue 17:09:39 ok 17:09:49 #topic Specs for Mitaka 17:10:16 does anyone have specs up that could use review? 17:10:33 according to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-spec-review-tracking everything should be merged at this point 17:11:16 are there specs that we should have and don't? 17:11:54 great 17:12:05 #topic Open Reviews 17:12:20 I was thinking, what about that thing we talked about with the cell for error state instances? does that need to be a spec? (sorry it took me too long to type that) 17:12:41 melwitt: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238665/ 17:12:46 heh 17:13:02 oops. okay 17:13:28 only problem with that is the name 17:13:33 but otherwise I think we're good 17:13:37 it happened quickly, before a lot of people even came back I think 17:13:42 dansmith: :) 17:13:46 oh I missed that one, but we discussed that at summit :) 17:14:00 nice 17:14:01 I like the name 17:14:02 cell0, all the flavor, none of the calories 17:14:09 hah 17:14:11 haha, that's awesome 17:14:24 thinking of cellU ? 17:14:30 bauzas: stop it! 17:14:34 don't reward him 17:14:37 bauzas: I didn't make that association until later sadly 17:15:04 cell0 will conflict with our existing naming schema :) 17:15:20 purgatoryCell 17:15:24 I don't think the name of it will be enforced 17:15:25 (c) notme 17:15:37 i.e. it probably doesn't need a name in the db 17:15:44 yeah 17:15:59 in v2 name doesn't really matter, they'll have uuids 17:16:01 anyways, cellsv1 names shouldn't hit cellsv2 names 17:16:12 s/hit/conflict 17:16:19 yep 17:16:27 yes 17:16:50 so, open reviews :) 17:17:02 I'll call out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211753/ for persisting the request spec object 17:17:38 if anyone else has anything please add it to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-priorities-tracking 17:18:11 #topic Open Discussion 17:18:20 I only have one topic 17:18:27 I propose that we skip this meeting next week 17:18:41 since it's very close to a US holiday 17:19:16 * bauzas promises to not speak of holidays 17:19:23 alaski: fair enough 17:19:25 though if there's a group of folks who will be around and want to have it go ahead 17:20:19 I should say major holiday. there are a lot that don't affect much 17:20:34 :) I'm good with skipping 17:20:37 um, it's the majorest holiday 17:21:26 dansmith: debatable, but it's up there :) 17:21:32 anything else today? 17:21:37 alaski: name one better holiday 17:21:55 I'm quite fond of new years 17:22:03 alaski: after 21 you stop getting tons of presents on christmas, so like a holiday dedicated to accelerating the adult diabetes is like ... pretty up there 17:22:09 alaski: meh, boring 17:22:18 no real obligations though 17:22:26 alaski: new years is much less fun on the west coast where the ball drop is taped :) 17:22:35 heh, fair point 17:23:01 alright, I think we're good for today 17:23:05 same time in two weeks 17:23:15 thanks everyone! 17:23:20 #endmeeting