16:59:59 <dansmith> #startmeeting nova_cells 17:00:00 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar 15 16:59:59 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dansmith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:02 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:04 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells' 17:00:18 <mriedem> o/ 17:00:22 <dtp> o/ 17:00:26 <dansmith> to make up for last week, this is going to be epic fast 17:00:32 <melwitt> o/. armpit 17:00:40 <dtp> lol 17:00:55 <dansmith> #topic testing/bugs 17:01:15 <dansmith> I got nothing (new) here 17:01:45 <melwitt> I guess we could mention the regression things, one is fixed, one is fix in the works right 17:02:12 <mriedem> that's not testing related 17:02:17 <dansmith> bugs 17:02:56 <dansmith> melwitt: the one regression that isn't merged is which one? 17:02:58 <melwitt> the topic says testing/bugs 17:03:03 <melwitt> the retry thing? 17:03:05 <melwitt> lemme see 17:03:16 <mriedem> yes 17:03:21 <dansmith> oh yeah, I forgot about that one 17:03:27 <melwitt> I'm having trouble finding these for some reason 17:03:33 <mriedem> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444106/ 17:04:01 <dansmith> yeah, I just starred that one 17:04:02 <melwitt> this is the bug that got fixed recently, regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1670627 17:04:02 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1670627 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ocata "quota is always in-use after delete the ERROR instances " [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem) 17:04:03 <mriedem> so that's being semi held up on a functional recreate 17:04:21 <melwitt> the one in progress is https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1671648 17:04:21 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1671648 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Instances are not rescheduled after deploy fails" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Shunli Zhou (shunliz) 17:04:21 <mriedem> yes, the quota one is fixed, and backported, and released in ocata 15.0.1, and notified to the ops list 17:04:50 <melwitt> so that's just fyi, for other people: dtp 17:05:01 <dtp> thanks 17:05:21 <dansmith> what else? 17:05:34 <melwitt> that's it that I know of 17:05:51 <mriedem> i'd like to try and work on the functional test recreate today, 17:05:57 <mriedem> but i have other stuff to do too 17:06:20 <dansmith> #topic open reviews/wounds 17:06:28 <dtp> ha 17:06:44 <dansmith> from last week, dtp's change merged, which is good 17:06:51 <dansmith> melwitt's quota stuff is still outstanding 17:06:54 <dtp> thanks for the reviews! 17:07:15 <dansmith> and my stuff has been making slow progress but has grown a few extra limbs 17:08:04 <mriedem> i still have to write the spec for the uuids in various apis 17:08:11 <mriedem> should be easy when i actually do it 17:08:14 <dansmith> mriedem: yeah, so on that, 17:08:25 * mriedem prepares 17:08:37 <melwitt> I still need to write the spec for placement project/user and then repropose the old console object spec. I should do that today 17:08:45 <dansmith> mriedem: your latest comment about me not having done that thing yet made it sound like you're good to move forward with that change before the api gets done? 17:08:51 <dansmith> because I was thinking about it the other day, 17:09:04 <dansmith> and as long as you can't delete the wrong thing by accident, 17:09:23 <dansmith> it's really just one of those caveats if you split out another cell until that new api merges, and will be that way in older microversions anyway 17:09:59 <mriedem> dansmith: i think i said it in your review a day or two ago, but i think we can bake the safety checks into your patch, as the api exists today, 17:10:02 <dansmith> I've been putting that work off thinking it was going to be behind that new api fix anyway, but it's coming up in the set pretty quick here 17:10:08 <mriedem> so if unique match, delete, if duplicate, 400 17:10:12 <dansmith> mriedem: yeah, we can for sure 17:10:29 <mriedem> the point of the microversion is that if there isn't a unique match, you pass the uuid on the microversoin 17:10:32 <mriedem> *microversion 17:10:38 <dansmith> yep 17:10:43 <mriedem> so it's not like the spec is blocking that change 17:10:58 <mriedem> i think we're on the same page 17:11:03 <dansmith> aye, thanks 17:11:25 <dansmith> what else in open wounds? 17:11:52 <melwitt> please review quotas patches everyone. you know you want to! 17:12:29 <melwitt> starts here https://review.openstack.org/410945 17:13:18 <dansmith> #topic open discussion 17:13:45 <dansmith> going once... 17:13:52 <mriedem> do it 17:14:03 <dansmith> #endmeeting