21:00:00 #startmeeting nova_cells 21:00:02 Meeting started Wed Mar 22 21:00:00 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dansmith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells' 21:00:14 o/ 21:00:15 o/ 21:00:27 o/ 21:00:36 #topic cells testing/bugs 21:00:51 I don't have anything for this section really, anyone else? 21:01:06 not I 21:01:30 nope 21:01:32 #topic open reviews 21:01:48 shameless plug for my stuff, which has lost some review momentum in the last few days: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445697 21:01:58 mriedem has the spec up for the service uuidification thing 21:02:06 I think dtp has been looking at that, which is cool 21:02:13 I said some things on it earlier 21:02:37 I'm still working on my stuff, nothing new to see yet 21:02:51 okay, I figured based on the reviews 21:03:04 yeah 21:03:15 * bauzas waves 21:03:15 whah tels? 21:03:33 i wasn't sure how ready the teaching api series was right now 21:03:38 but i guess it is 21:03:49 the .. what? 21:03:58 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/cells-aware-api 21:04:04 I need to iterate again on your series 21:04:05 i wasn't sure what state it was in 21:04:33 mriedem: awaiting reviews.. the bottom patch is ack'd by gibi and there are a couple above with with various +2age 21:05:02 oh, teaching about cellsv2 21:05:05 what's a teaching api 21:05:06 just realized what you meant 21:05:06 i'll hit it after going through john's 10 policy specs 21:05:14 mriedem: thanks 21:05:34 anything else for this section? 21:06:30 okie 21:06:36 #topic open discussion 21:07:19 i don't have anything 21:07:34 neither i 21:07:39 is there anything i can help with? 21:08:16 dtp: i think, 21:08:18 dtp: were you going to help with the actual implementation part of what mriedem has been cooking up in spec? 21:08:27 we know the services table is going to need a uuid 21:08:36 so you could start a patch that adds that db schema change 21:09:03 yeah 21:09:05 i hadn't thought about it. but i can 21:09:23 I missed the service uuid discussion 21:09:36 I guess it's because the current ID is a PK, right? 21:09:46 mriedem has a wonderful spec all about it 21:09:48 it's good reading 21:09:57 bauzas: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447149/ 21:10:17 * bauzas opens a new tab 21:10:21 okay 21:10:34 hah, bingo 21:10:48 AFAIR, we also have flavor IDs right? 21:10:49 anything else? I think we're done here otherwise 21:11:01 flavors are in the api db 21:11:03 no 21:11:03 services are not 21:11:10 different problem 21:11:14 oh right, flavors are in the API DB, nvm 21:11:38 API DB has a flavor 21:12:14 I haven't tasted the api db, but I imagine it tastes rather metallic 21:12:26 like blood 21:12:36 lol 21:12:50 will someone second my motion to adjourn? 21:13:00 o/ 21:13:05 +2 21:13:21 sorry for having disturbed your motion 21:13:23 parliamentary procedure requires a verbal second 21:13:24 :p 21:13:29 nay 21:13:32 drat! 21:13:34 minority opinion 21:13:36 hahaha 21:13:46 second 21:13:47 let's go 21:13:49 minority opinion on this: 21:13:52 #endmeeting