21:00:09 #startmeeting nova_cells 21:00:09 Meeting started Wed Apr 19 21:00:09 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dansmith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_cells' 21:00:19 hi 21:00:21 o/ 21:00:47 alrighty 21:00:54 #topic testing/bugs 21:01:26 my one thing here is just that I'm getting closer on the devstack patch.. took the WIP off of it and got an almost clean run on top of the nova stack 21:01:33 and addressed the devstack core feedback I think 21:01:53 I still need to put up a canary patch against nova to pull it in so I can see if there are other weirder tests we fail for some reason 21:02:22 anything else here? 21:02:55 alright then 21:02:58 #topic open reviews 21:03:13 still have a few in my set waiting for reviews, 21:03:25 including one re-do I had to handle after we reverted one of the earlier ones from that set 21:03:29 'cause it was broken 21:03:40 melwitt has a thousand patches up for review 21:03:59 yup, sorry folks 21:04:22 well, better than the monolithic one, at least.. easier to review the small chunks I think 21:04:22 zuul had a time crunching on those yesterday night when I uploaded them 21:04:31 I noticed you still have the -2 on the bottom one 21:04:59 we were going to hold that until we were sure so we don't do unnecessary stuff, but I think in the interest of trimming the set we could probably go ahead with that right? 21:05:06 AFAICT, the only test failures you'll see on those are the ironic unit test intermittent failure we know about 21:05:33 and there's one func test fail that is also non deterministic on the last patch 21:05:55 yeah, I wasn't sure what everyone else thought on what to do about the -2 21:06:15 I think we'll never make progress if we don't start to whittle it down 21:06:32 so unless you want to move that elsewhere in the set, 21:06:37 I'd say we go for it 21:07:09 yeah 21:07:31 okay, I'll remove that then. each piece stands on its own so it should be fine 21:07:40 cool 21:08:09 dtp: any status on the service stuff you and mriedem are working on? 21:08:35 the first patch merged, with the database column add...haven't started on the services endpoint yet 21:08:42 okay 21:08:44 think i'll start next week 21:09:47 okay anything else in open reviews? 21:10:55 #topic open discussion 21:11:03 anything here? 21:12:09 melwitt: I thought that bottom patch was already 2x+2 but I guess not 21:12:32 it was but I updated some code comments for jaypipes, or something like that 21:12:37 looks like john had a few comments on the last rev.. soft questions maybe? 21:12:50 maybe address those and we'll try to get him to look at it again? 21:12:57 looking 21:13:11 address meaning "answer" 21:13:50 yeah, gah, I didn't reply on the review, I had talked to him in IRC about it 21:13:57 okay cool 21:14:09 maybe throw something on there to summarize to close that loop then? 21:14:14 and I'll go look at it when we're done here 21:14:35 yeah, I'll ping him on IRC tomorrow and refresh whatever that was, then I'll write something on the review like I should have done last time when I talked to him 21:14:43 okay 21:14:50 basically I asked him what he meant and he said he didn't know either 21:14:59 heh okay 21:15:13 okay, anything else from anyone? 21:15:45 going once 21:16:09 #endmeeting