17:00:06 #startmeeting nova notification 17:00:07 Meeting started Tue Jun 14 17:00:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_notification' 17:00:14 hi 17:00:18 hi 17:00:18 hello, world :) 17:00:21 hi 17:00:25 hi 17:00:43 ! 17:00:58 rlrossit told me he will not join today 17:01:55 so I guess we can start 17:02:00 #topic outstanding reviews 17:02:36 the patches that moved around the existing notification code has been merged 17:03:22 there is some core attention on the first two transformation patches (wrap exception and instance.delete) 17:03:51 I've updated the intance.update one, I guess now it is complete and can be reviewed 17:04:19 I saw that multiple transformation is taken from the todo list and patches started to appear 17:04:39 I think I managed the do the first round of review on all of them 17:04:51 but if you have one I missed then please tell me 17:05:18 please update the wiki with the link to your patches for easier discovery 17:05:55 gibi: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329214/2. I have updated wiki as well 17:06:11 siva_krish: thanks, will check it tomorrow 17:06:18 gibi: I seem to be having issues logging into the wiki 17:06:30 is there another way to take up a task besides editing the wiki 17:07:01 tell me which one you want to take and I will put that on the wiki 17:07:08 syjulian: wiki is blocked for new logins 17:07:14 ah 17:07:15 but also please ask for help on openstack-infra about the wiki login 17:07:27 gotcha. i'll talk to them 17:08:01 macsz: thanks 17:08:04 most probably they will giveyou a small time window during which you have to register with your launchpadid 17:08:37 syjulian, I had issues logging in last week. got help from openstack-infra.. 17:09:05 great, then infra will help 17:09:12 ah ok. I'll go into their irc and ask for help 17:09:14 thanks guys 17:09:27 syjulian: in the meantime I can updatea the wiki with your choice if you want 17:09:59 cool. some folks in my team are also wanting to pick some up. I can send you our choices later 17:10:06 syjulian: OK 17:10:42 btw, syjulian, you made a good progress on the schema generation patches in oslo.versionedobjects repo. 17:10:56 thanks gibi! :) 17:11:04 I will keep an eye on those patches in the coming days 17:11:15 I hope rlrossit will have some time also to look at it 17:11:23 seems he is busy these days 17:11:53 Ok, besides siva_krish, did somebody has a patch about notification we should look at? 17:12:40 I take the silence as a firm no :) 17:12:42 will have one later today :) 17:12:53 macsz: OK, I will check it tomorrow 17:13:08 gibi, You reviewed my patch. I made a change that you have suggested 17:13:44 pumaranikar: thanks, I will check back later tomorrow 17:14:16 In general the patches looked good. Thank you guys for the effort 17:14:38 please review each other code that also helps 17:15:22 OK so if not other reviews to look at then 17:15:26 #topic open discussion 17:15:52 anybody has anything else to discuss? 17:16:46 seems like this will be a sort meeting 17:17:18 gibi, for some actions, we are thinking of changing event type. Any suggestions/inputs on that ? 17:17:51 pumaranikar: yeah, if you look at the event type of those actions then you can see some contradictions with the reset 17:17:54 rest 17:18:23 for example 17:18:35 there is instance.live.migration.abort and there is others with instance.live_migrate 17:18:44 sorry, live_migration 17:19:32 there I would go choose the live_migration name 17:19:53 as that '.' is better to be kept for the separation of the object, action, phase 17:20:14 gibi, yes. ok 17:20:47 I think in these cases we have to agree in the review which name we shall take 17:21:06 I think it won't be a big deal just noted it to remember 17:23:11 gibi: shoud we also add new notifications for error? or, for now, just stick with start and end phase? 17:23:21 In general we shall focus on merging the reviews we already have before we open new ones as core review bandwidth is limited 17:23:44 macsz: if the legacy notification has .error phase then please transform it 17:23:59 in case of error old notifications have additional field ‘fault’, which is missing in new notifications 17:24:03 ok 17:24:33 we have fault field in the IntanceActionPayload 17:24:50 so you can put the fault there in case of an .error notification 17:25:49 ok, thanks :) 17:25:57 there is an example here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/328055/ but it is not a transformation but a new notification 17:26:10 but the basics are the same for the .error 17:27:47 OK, anything else? 17:28:23 if anything pops up, do not hesitate to ping me on irc 17:28:39 let's close the meeting then. 17:28:55 thanks for showing up! see you around! 17:29:08 thanks, see you :) 17:29:12 thanks gibi 17:29:15 #endmeeting