17:00:13 #startmeeting nova notification 17:00:14 Meeting started Tue May 2 17:00:13 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_notification' 17:00:18 hi! 17:00:22 o/ 17:00:44 mriedem: hi! Will this be our personal meeting time? :) 17:01:14 i think so 17:01:45 this is a bit worries me 17:01:52 not because of you 17:01:58 but because of nobody else :) 17:02:27 everyone else is busy with everything else 17:02:52 but if it is just you and me then we don't need the meeting slot, I guess 17:03:16 and calling this as subteam is a but funny :) 17:03:28 anyhow let's keep this sort 17:03:45 I saw your patch about uuid in service notifications 17:03:57 yeah just updated it 17:04:12 will check again but I'm pretty sure it is OK now 17:04:32 besides that I encurage you to look at the volume.attach .detach patches 17:04:47 starts here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401992/ 17:04:53 these are ready for a while 17:05:40 ok, 17:05:48 also we have ready patches here as well https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/additional-notification-fields-for-searchlight 17:05:48 i've been distracted with the summit planning 17:05:57 the BDM and the keypairs 17:06:33 sure I can imagine forum planning takes a lot of effort 17:06:48 it is more like listing for you what we have ready :) 17:07:13 I will talk to Kevin_Zheng about tag in instance.create https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459493/ 17:07:15 well, 3 talks plus need to get the forum session agenda written up 17:07:16 to see if I can help 17:07:26 ok 17:07:42 i was looking at your comment in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/461032/ 17:08:02 and i noticed that _verify_notification isn't going to check extra_specs or projects anyway 17:08:11 because those aren't in the db flavor dict passed to that method 17:08:53 good point 17:09:03 then I think it is not just a comment that is missing 17:09:11 so i could pass expected_projects and expected_extra_specs 17:09:26 that sounds OK to me 17:09:35 or, 17:09:42 shouldn't "if field in flavor:" be checked against flavor_obj? 17:10:24 if that works (I don't see why doesn't) it is even better 17:11:59 so both OK to me but the later seems even nicer 17:12:32 ok i'll mess with it 17:13:51 I find nothing else in my mind that need to be discussed. Do you have anything else? 17:13:56 nope 17:14:08 i'll try to get those attach/detach ones reviewed this week 17:14:11 but that might be as much as i can do 17:14:50 any review helps! thanks for that 17:15:12 I will not schedule a meeting for next week due to the forum 17:15:25 I hope you will enjoy Boston 17:15:46 thanks, i'll enjoy when it's over 17:15:53 :) 17:16:05 let's close this. bye! 17:16:12 ttyl 17:16:14 #endmeeting