17:00:14 #startmeeting nova notification 17:00:14 Meeting started Tue Apr 24 17:00:14 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:18 The meeting name has been set to 'nova_notification' 17:01:24 o/ 17:01:35 o/ 17:01:51 I have only one thing 17:02:17 we kept the bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/add-server-group-remove-member-notifications in Pending Approval state 17:02:28 to look at the implementation first 17:02:47 and Takashi proposed the impl https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559076/ 17:03:04 it is on my list to look at 17:03:17 but I wanted to have a generic reminder 17:03:53 I think the original prbolem with the bp was the extra DB query needed for the notification 17:04:09 and that is indeed needed 17:04:11 see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559076/1/nova/compute/utils.py 17:04:11 i see another problem 17:06:42 comment inline 17:06:48 dansmith would not like that upcall 17:07:09 ohh, we need an upcall as well? yeah, that is a real problem 17:07:55 so, 17:08:21 1. i don't see what need we have for this besides maybe takashi is trying to mirror the server group member ADD notification with a REMOVE notification, but there is nothing in the bp saying people are actually asking for this 17:08:38 2. the bp notes mention that we don't need the remove member notification for the overquota recheck thing in the api, 17:08:51 3. the upcall for the server delete case is not something we want to add, especially for something that no users are asking for 17:09:23 I agree to ask takashi about the real use case 17:09:53 i could also reply to your notifications update email 17:09:56 assuming there is one, can we just pass down the server group information from the super conductor to the compute manager during delete 17:10:01 ? 17:10:22 mriedem: asking takashin on the ML is OK for me 17:10:27 probably, but i'd like to avoid having to do that if we don't really need this 17:10:35 mriedem: agree 17:10:57 i've got one thing 17:11:19 go ahead 17:11:41 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/add-full-traceback-to-error-notifications - i wanted to mention, if you're too busy for that, Kevin_Zheng might be interested in taking it on since his request_id in notifications blueprint is complete now 17:11:49 we'd have to ask him, since it's just a thought 17:12:16 he does have another blueprint he hasn't started coding yet so i'm not sure about his availability 17:12:34 good point. I'm pusshing that bp down on my list of things for a while now 17:12:45 right, i figured with the bw based scheduling stuff.... 17:12:49 that's going to take up all of your time 17:12:49 I will ask Kevin_Zheng 17:12:58 cool 17:13:06 yeah, the bw stuff is a heavy one 17:13:16 i saw the etherpad... 17:13:48 we have a good hangout with jaypipes yesterday that cleaned up a list of things 17:14:09 sothe next spec version will be a good step forward I think 17:14:24 anyhow it is a lot of work 17:14:32 ok good, i've been waiting to read the latest update because of the recent churn 17:14:50 that's all i have for notifications 17:14:51 I promise that the next version will be shorter with a bunch of outscoping ;) 17:14:57 I have nothing else either 17:15:00 so let's close this 17:15:04 o/ 17:15:04 thanks for the meeting 17:15:09 #endmeeting