15:05:19 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova_scheduler
15:05:20 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May  5 15:05:19 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:05:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:05:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova_scheduler'
15:05:31 <edleafe> o/
15:05:35 <bauzas> \o
15:05:43 <bauzas> aloha, sorry for having missed out the start
15:06:02 <edleafe> no worries - on a call for another meeting now anyway
15:06:32 <bauzas> let's wait for a few other peers - unless I just bored them
15:08:11 <bauzas> tic tac
15:08:23 * alaski lurking
15:08:31 <edleafe> tic tock
15:08:46 * edleafe thinks of mints when I see 'tic tac'
15:09:03 <bauzas> :)
15:09:21 <bauzas> lots of peers there
15:09:33 <bauzas> ok, starting but it should be quick
15:09:42 <bauzas> since I expect no real debate :)
15:09:47 <bauzas> #topic Liberty specs
15:10:11 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/liberty
15:10:40 <bauzas> so this page ^ is a little out-to-date, I'll discuss with n0ano to see how we can update it
15:11:00 <bauzas> most of the BPs we target for Lib are in
15:11:01 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-nova-summit-ideas
15:11:19 <bauzas> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/allocation-ratio-to-resource-tracker => https://review.openstack.org/173252 (sbauza)https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/request-spec-object => https://review.openstack.org/173316 (sbauza)https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/resource-objectshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/make-resource-tracker-use-objectshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shared-s
15:11:28 <bauzas> oh man, sorry for the wrong paste
15:13:14 <bauzas> #info if people have BPs they want to include in the scheduler effort, please add them in the etherpad (L98) so we can review that before the Summit
15:14:14 <bauzas> nothing really in progress from my POV, I'm tighly following https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76234/ as the first step for RequestSpec object
15:14:41 <bauzas> will discuss with danpb to see when he plans to upload a new update
15:15:32 <bauzas> okay, anything else to mention about specs ?
15:16:05 <bauzas> (silence)
15:16:28 <edleafe> nope
15:16:39 <bauzas> ok, moving on
15:16:47 <bauzas> #topic Vancouver design summit
15:17:12 <bauzas> nothing really important from my POV again, just has to work on a spec before the summit
15:17:30 <bauzas> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shared-state-scheduler is not having a spec yet
15:17:59 <bauzas> I remember n0ano was interested in discussing on cross-project sessions
15:18:36 <edleafe> bauzas: I feel a lot will come after the discussions
15:18:46 <edleafe> Still too much up in the air now
15:18:54 <bauzas> agreed
15:19:04 <bauzas> just looking at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vCTZBJKCMZ2xBhglnuK3ciKo3E8UMFo5S5lmIAYMCSE/edit to see if anything related to us
15:19:36 <edleafe> Line 28
15:19:55 <bauzas> oh
15:19:57 <bauzas> rightr
15:20:01 <bauzas> let's see the outcome then
15:20:19 <bauzas> I honestly doubt it would be accepted, but that's good anyway for discussing
15:20:33 <edleafe> I see that as a refinement of the whose request spec object/ claim object pattern
15:20:46 <edleafe> s/whose/whole
15:21:36 <bauzas> edleafe: not sure I follow you
15:21:46 <bauzas> edleafe: oh
15:22:06 <bauzas> edleafe: well, yeah, it's related to if a resource needs to be claimed
15:22:06 <edleafe> bauzas: how to design the objects to represent any type of resource
15:22:34 <bauzas> edleafe: but IMHO all of that is related to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/resource-objects at some point
15:22:48 <bauzas> without having that BP implemented, that sounds a little premature IMHO
15:23:18 <bauzas> anyway
15:23:21 <edleafe> bauzas: I think it will make it more robust so that it requires less refactoring later
15:23:35 <bauzas> edleafe: that's just chicken-and-egg
15:23:42 <edleafe> bauzas: not really
15:23:53 <bauzas> edleafe: let's work on implementing bp/resource-objects, we could refine later
15:24:07 <bauzas> anyway
15:24:14 <edleafe> understanding other types of resources means less refinement needed later
15:24:19 <bauzas> let's move on unless someone has a thought ?
15:24:48 <bauzas> edleafe: the spec is approved, so there are little options to change the direction
15:25:13 <bauzas> but I don't want to debate much about that spec, it was enough done during Kilo :D
15:25:17 <edleafe> specs can be amended and re-approved
15:25:20 <edleafe> :)
15:25:53 <bauzas> edleafe: well, the situation is clear : we need to implement that spec - and possibly amend it
15:26:02 <edleafe> yep
15:26:03 <bauzas> edleafe: but at least, we need to implement it
15:26:21 <bauzas> anyway for anyway
15:26:24 <bauzas> let's move on
15:26:29 <bauzas> #topic open discussion
15:27:39 <bauzas> let them speak or forever hold, should I say ?
15:27:57 * edleafe hears crickets
15:28:38 * bauzas hears that too
15:28:41 <bauzas> #endmeeting