16:30:42 <tjones> #startmeeting novabugscrub
16:30:43 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jun 11 16:30:42 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tjones. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:30:44 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:30:46 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'novabugscrub'
16:30:52 <tjones> hi anyone around?
16:30:57 <wendar> o/
16:31:03 <tjones> hey wendar
16:31:11 <wendar> hi
16:31:27 <tjones> thanks for helping.  i did the obvious tags this am
16:31:34 <wendar> excellent
16:31:36 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=-*&field.status%3Alist=NEW
16:31:42 <tjones> left with a couple
16:32:01 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1326566
16:33:07 <tjones> 1st i thought compute, but now im thinking network as it is failing in the network cleanup code
16:33:53 <wendar> hmmmm... it's one of those cascading problems
16:33:57 <tjones> yeah
16:34:26 <tjones> well the 1st prob is handled properly by compute, but the cleanup is failing
16:34:51 <wendar> like, something needs to abort after the first error, but is trying to proceed normally
16:35:05 <tjones> hmmm - then is could still be compute
16:35:45 <wendar> it's in ovs
16:36:05 <geekinutah> sorry, came in late, what bug is this?
16:36:10 <wendar> (that was a ...)
16:36:12 <tjones> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1326566
16:36:28 <tjones> so networking then??
16:36:38 * kashyap here
16:36:44 <tjones> hey kashyap
16:37:23 <kashyap> tjones, I'm currently going through NEW bugs - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
16:37:48 <kashyap> And, tag appropriate stuff, mostly I'll keep an eye on libvirt stuff but can try others too
16:37:51 <wendar> tjones: yeah, I'd go with networking
16:38:01 <tjones> we are just tagging a couple of remianing bugs so the subteam owners can take the next pass
16:38:20 <kashyap> tjones, Also, libvirt tag for the above bug
16:38:36 <tjones> ok done
16:38:43 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1326599
16:39:04 <tjones> oslo???
16:39:41 <wendar> tjones: or api?
16:39:55 <tjones> really no idea
16:39:58 <kashyap> Yeah, api, looking at the fix
16:40:01 <kashyap> and Nova
16:40:06 * mriedem joins late
16:40:20 <tjones> hi mriedem we are on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1326599
16:40:28 <tjones> api and nova
16:40:41 <mriedem> tag with api
16:40:41 <tjones> well everything is nova ;-)
16:40:45 <geekinutah> seems like network is the appropriate tag for that guy
16:40:52 <mriedem> kenichi opened it so he probably knows the isue
16:41:02 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1326901
16:41:58 <kashyap> conductor
16:42:06 <mriedem> yup
16:42:12 <kashyap> #link FYI - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bug_Tags#Nova
16:42:44 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1327028
16:43:03 <mriedem> for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1326901 i asked what release they are on
16:43:14 <mriedem> those details are usually lacking
16:43:21 <tjones> yeah good idea
16:43:32 <mriedem> "shit blows up, please figure it out..."
16:43:37 <tjones> lol
16:43:37 <kashyap> :-)
16:43:54 <kashyap> Also, this bug looks woefully short of info -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1327028
16:43:54 <tjones> next one seems like api but really an opinion
16:44:02 <tjones> yes that is the one
16:44:30 <mriedem> yeah, ask for more info, which API is used, which release are they on, what is the request and response, etc
16:44:48 <tjones> done
16:45:02 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1327406
16:45:19 <mriedem> tjones: marked that previous one as incomplete
16:45:27 <tjones> mriedem: good idea
16:45:29 * kashyap wrote this wiki page a while ago -- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugFilingRecommendations
16:45:38 <kashyap> Should probably stick it in most bugs I try to triage
16:46:02 <tjones> now this next one is networking.  kashyap great!  i'll start adding that when there is not enough info
16:47:08 <tjones> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1328367
16:47:47 <mriedem> hold up a sec
16:47:52 <mriedem> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1327406
16:48:09 <mriedem> there was a patch for nova so status changed to in progress and assigned the owern
16:48:11 <mriedem> *owner
16:48:13 <mriedem> also tagged with network
16:48:31 <tjones> i just tagged with network
16:48:47 <mriedem> this is my first nova bug meeting, but are we not going through the bugs like that in detail? or is this just quickly tagging things?
16:49:12 <tjones> well this one has a proposed patch - so i was quickly moving over it
16:49:17 <wendar> mriedem: we're doing quick triage
16:49:49 <tjones> the purpose is to get things in the column owners awareness - they may not see untagged bugs
16:50:01 <wendar> essentially, making sure the bugs are raised to the attention of the folks who have agreed to own a particular tag space
16:50:05 <mriedem> are the column owners actually looking at them though?
16:50:11 <kashyap> mriedem, They ought to be gone over in detail, I try my best to find root-cause and post deails
16:50:29 <tjones> some are some are not.  i try to send a nag email every once in a while
16:50:54 <wendar> 1328367 I'm leaning toward compute
16:51:31 <tjones> wendar: ok makes sense
16:51:42 <mriedem> also tag with resize and/or migration
16:51:44 <mriedem> or migrate
16:51:55 <mriedem> i've been trying to tag resize/migrate bugs also
16:52:12 <tjones> niether of those are official tags - should we add that to the list?
16:52:28 * kashyap is still to do a resize test of Nova instance in multi-node setup to reconfirm a certain bug
16:52:50 <mriedem> just something i've been doing
16:52:50 <kashyap> tjones, Yeah, I was wondering _who_ blesses them as "official" tags
16:52:53 <mriedem> compute tag is very broad
16:53:02 <tjones> mikal is the blesser of tags
16:53:04 <kashyap> True, doesn't mean anything
16:53:25 <mriedem> resize seems to be a particularly nasty thing for bugs we get
16:53:31 <wendar> the significant difference is whether anyone is watching the tag
16:53:32 <mriedem> in part b/c we don't have multi-node tempest testing in the gate
16:53:44 <wendar> so, if mriedem wants to watch resize or migration, I say add it
16:53:44 <mriedem> i think it's useful for finding duplicates though
16:53:49 <mriedem> i don't want to watch it
16:53:53 <mriedem> but i don't want 20 duplicates
16:53:55 <kashyap> Uh, yeah. I admit twice I attempted to reproduce a nasty resize bug, got distracted and did something else
16:53:57 <mriedem> b/c it's not tested upstream
16:54:05 <tjones> i think we should spend some time in portland talking about this stuff.
16:54:10 <mriedem> tjones: it's on the agenda
16:54:14 <tjones> yep
16:54:20 <tjones> and the reason i am going ;-)
16:54:35 <tjones> ok last untagged one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1328966
16:54:40 <mriedem> but my point is, until we have multi-node resize/migrate testing in the gate, we can sub-tag these for compute to avoid duplicates hopefully
16:55:06 <kashyap> Exactly, the bug I was testing works fine in a single node allinone style setup, but blows up in a 2-node setup
16:55:15 <wendar> api
16:55:36 <tjones> duh
16:55:43 <tjones> i guess i ran out of time on that one
16:56:01 <wendar> or, it came in 43 minutes ago :)
16:56:13 <tjones> lol
16:56:30 <mriedem> tjones: i talked to him about that this morning in nova
16:56:35 <mriedem> it's triaged
16:56:37 <mriedem> tag with api
16:56:49 <tjones> folks - this wiki shows the offical tags and has links to untriaged.  if you are a tag owner then please take a look at your column https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage
16:56:58 <tjones> mriedem: i know - i just tagged it
16:57:25 <tjones> there are 171 total untriaged bugs across all columns
16:57:35 <tjones> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
16:59:02 <tjones> almost out of time.  anyone have anything they want to discuss for 1 minute?
16:59:16 <tjones> kashyap: i've added your wiki to my meeting page.  thanks
16:59:16 <wendar> bug day?
16:59:32 <kashyap> tjones, Sure, no worries.
16:59:36 <tjones> well…  it was mixed.  some people did a lot, many people did not
17:00:22 <tjones> i've got to go run another meeting.  thanks all for helping out today
17:00:24 <tjones> #endmeeting