16:34:16 <tjones> #startmeeting novabugscrub 16:34:17 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Aug 13 16:34:16 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tjones. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:34:18 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:34:20 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'novabugscrub' 16:40:21 <mspreitz> What's the etiquette here? I found a bug that I think is kind of important, and its importance is not marked in launchpad. 16:44:16 <mspreitz> tjones: What's the etiquette here? I found a bug that I think is kind of important, and its importance is not marked in launchpad. 16:44:39 <tjones> sorry - was doing something else ;-) 16:44:47 <tjones> can you share the link - lets take a look? 16:44:58 <mspreitz> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1327406 16:45:15 <mspreitz> The initial description is long and unclear, but I think I have a short sharp statement now 16:45:33 <mspreitz> The problem concerns Flat and FlatDHCP network managers in Nova networking 16:45:47 <mspreitz> the list-networks operation does not return any networks, if not done by an admin 16:46:14 <mspreitz> that is, if a non-admin user invokes it, the result is zero networks 16:46:14 <tjones> yes it's very long ;-) 16:46:30 <mspreitz> At first I was unsure of what to blame 16:46:33 <mspreitz> Now I think it is clear 16:46:37 <tjones> lets mark it high them - sounds like something a customer could easily hit 16:46:48 <tjones> your patch was abandoned though? 16:46:53 <mspreitz> Yes, in fact I was astonished the gate is not already hitting it 16:47:11 <mspreitz> I submitted two patches, the first abandoned, the second is in play 16:47:15 <tjones> ok good 16:47:30 <mspreitz> Thers is also a patch adding a tempest test that exposes the bug 16:47:36 <tjones> i've set it to high prio 16:47:39 <mspreitz> thanks 16:47:42 <tjones> sure 16:48:05 <tjones> no complex etiquette here ;-) 16:48:16 <mspreitz> great 16:48:32 <mspreitz> With a metric ton of bugs, there easily could be a lot of process... 16:49:21 <mspreitz> thanks for the progress on this one 17:02:10 <tjones> sure 17:02:13 <tjones> #endmeeting