20:00:04 #startmeeting Octavia 20:00:08 o/ 20:00:10 o/ 20:00:11 Meeting started Wed Apr 13 20:00:04 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnsom_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 20:00:23 Hi there 20:00:47 I guess I'm _ for the meeting 20:00:57 o/ 20:01:00 hi 20:01:01 hi 20:01:11 #topic Announcements 20:01:28 I'm gonna wfh for the reset of the night. Later 20:01:32 oops wrong channel 20:01:35 The only announcement I have this week is the bandit gate is working now 20:02:14 It is still non-voting, but we can refer to it for security issues found in the patchset. 20:02:17 Howdy folks! 20:02:27 hello 20:02:28 Oh, that's great! 20:02:29 Welcome back sbalukoff 20:02:35 Thanks, johnsom_! 20:02:43 i sensed a darkness coming to these lands 20:02:46 Any other announcements? 20:02:55 i should have known sbalukoff would be back 20:03:01 blogan: Muahaha! 20:03:14 yowzers 20:03:35 o/ 20:03:35 Ouch, well, good to know I'm not the only haven't IRC issues today 20:03:39 Thus the _ 20:03:46 #topic Docu-geddon 20:04:00 Still looking for folks to adopt documentation bugs: 20:04:08 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bugs?field.tag=docs 20:04:43 net split 20:04:54 I need to poke the oslo folks to get a taskflow release so I can merge the flow docs 20:05:03 Yeah, hmmm 20:05:07 I should hopefully be able to tackle one or two of those docs bugs this week. 20:05:15 Nice! 20:05:28 we should mention the design session 20:05:43 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 20:05:49 (FWIW, I'm back, but I picked up some nasty tropical disease in Myanmar and have essentially been floored with fatigue in the days since returning.) 20:06:00 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286365/ 20:06:04 irc cloud is failing me badly today 20:06:29 I also plan on putting together something for an L7 demo during the talk (ie. the doc link you sent in e-mail, johnsom) in the next week. 20:06:33 irc cloud is failing me badly today 20:06:42 Otherwise, I've no progress to report, alas. 20:06:50 sbalukoff Ok great, I was going to ask about that later 20:06:53 yeah, in and out as well 20:06:58 I will be on vacation for next 25 days, I was hoping to close that one if its possible asap 20:07:21 25 days! 20:07:26 As xgerman mentioned, there are design sessions for neutron: 20:07:28 #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/global-search?t=Neutron%3A 20:07:38 bana_k: I'll have a look. 20:07:40 The first one is for aaS 20:07:43 there's just the one for *aas right? 20:07:51 blogan: yes sir ! 20:07:57 <-- working on more neutron-lbaas tests. review requested for TLS Barbican Scneario Test (has 2 +1's already): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164828 20:08:05 sbalukoff : thank you. 20:08:16 wrote this bug up yesterday: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1569536 20:08:18 Launchpad bug 1569536 in neutron "Neutron-LBaaS v2: Unable to remove SSL/TLS Barbican container reference on listener" [Medium,Triaged] 20:08:23 We might have interest in the neutron client session as well 20:08:41 doesn't it not have a future :) 20:08:52 That was my hope. :) 20:08:58 Open 20:09:07 openstack CLI from Newton on out, eh? 20:09:09 I have been working on a bug fix that moves haproxy into a network namespace: 20:09:11 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300292/ 20:09:43 Could use some reviews. I would like to get that merged and backport to Mitaka so we can cut a bug fix Mitaka release 20:10:11 Yeah, openstack client is probably in our future 20:10:29 who knows — there is a ton of contoversy 20:10:53 does osc have dynamic extensions? 20:11:13 It does have something of a sort I think 20:11:32 johnsom_: That's awesome. 20:11:44 The haproxy in namespace thing. 20:11:59 Don't quote me on that as I have been trying to not pay attention to it 20:12:30 Ok, any other progress updates? 20:12:45 #topic Open Discussion 20:13:18 Great to hear you can work on L7 demo sbalukoff. I think we will have L7 and horizon dashboard demos 20:13:27 I still need to work on my slides 20:13:33 As of next Wednesday (assuming I'm not hospitalized and quarantined as patient zero for the next disease to sweep America), Dustin and I will be road-tripping on motorcycles to the Austin summit. 20:13:43 heh 20:13:49 as such, I'll probably not be at next week's meeting and will be reachable in the evenings when we're in motels. 20:13:52 Awesome sbalukoff !! 20:13:59 +1 20:14:03 Ah, nice. So, please upload the demo video before you go... Just in case 20:14:03 (sorry I'm late :D ) 20:14:05 grin 20:14:36 (results from tests on that patient zero stuff should be in later this week. I'm hoping it was just some really, really bad shrimp that I ate.) 20:14:58 Other than the shellfish, I highly recommend a trip to Myanmar. 20:15:02 It was *awesome* 20:15:47 Ok, any other topics this week? 20:15:55 If anyone is still in the channel 20:16:23 Heh! Yeah, IRC network is having a bad time of it today. 20:16:24 johnsom_ I'm working out *one* kink I found in the neutron lbaas single create 20:16:35 Ok 20:16:35 Then its not WIP 20:16:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/257201 20:16:55 So I'll need some reviews on it o_0 20:17:05 TrevorV: Sounds good! 20:17:08 I'm also looking into a bug where it looks like neutron is returning a 500 when a member create call comes in during PENDING_UPDATE 20:17:26 Aaah-- instead of a 409. 20:17:32 Right 20:17:45 That's okay, right? I mean, no one tries to do that anyway... right? 20:17:48 I am working on the lab session: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1AqmF3BnKLLu1W1n-XT5MSfVYrGue1JIwKSvjbWgGA6s/edit?usp=sharing 20:17:50 Haha 20:17:50 RIGHT? No? Okay, I'll sit down... 20:18:29 TrevorV We tell them it's pending update, what more do they need right? Picky about 500 vs. 409.... grin 20:18:38 Haha 20:18:46 xgerman: that's great! 20:19:09 yeah, need to figure out how pools and l7 work now 20:19:38 xgerman: I'm happy to respond to questions about that if you have any, eh! 20:20:04 thanks — might have some 20:20:18 I also plan on being at the lab as well, of course. 20:20:28 So I can answer from people in the audience who ask. 20:20:41 ok, I kept you on the front slide :-) 20:20:49 Haha! 20:20:58 Oh, one more thing I should note. It was discovered that FIP to Octavia VIP with DVR enabled doesn't work. 20:21:04 I will try really hard not to talk over johnsom. As tempting as that always is. 20:21:28 johnsom: D'oh. So, we have to figure out why not. :/ 20:21:35 Ha, thanks 20:21:36 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1569918 20:21:37 Launchpad bug 1569918 in neutron "Allowed_address_pair fixed_ip configured with FloatingIP after getting associated with a VM port does not work with DVR routers" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan) 20:21:52 Summary, DVR doesn't work right with allowed address pairs 20:21:59 you had me at "DVR". 20:22:05 Oh! Ok, so not "our" problem per se. 20:22:24 Even though it totally affects us. 20:22:41 Right, any neutron port using allowed address pairs. 20:22:59 So, yeah, now you know. Disabling DVR resolves the issue. 20:23:21 Or not using FIPs? 20:23:31 That would work too 20:23:37 yep 20:23:43 there is some patch 20:23:54 * sbalukoff hates FIPs, precious. 20:23:56 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304905/ 20:24:01 tricksy FIPs. 20:24:08 not sure if that will make it work or not 20:24:45 Ok, any other topics? 20:24:56 If not we can let sbalukoff go rest 20:24:59 Thanks, y'all! 20:25:21 #endmeeting