19:59:59 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
20:00:00 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jul 27 19:59:59 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00:01 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
20:00:04 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
20:00:06 <sbalukoff> Howdy, folks!
20:00:07 <TrevorV> o/
20:00:09 <blogan> hi
20:00:15 <johnsom> Hi everyone
20:00:35 <johnsom> Another fine week in Octavia/LBaaS land....
20:00:44 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
20:00:59 <johnsom> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/LbaasNewtonSprint
20:01:09 <sbalukoff> Also, voting is open for talks!
20:01:10 <johnsom> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lbaas-octavia-newton-midcycle
20:01:18 <chenli> o/
20:01:36 <johnsom> Our mid-cycle is approaching.  Please sign up on the wiki if you plan to attend
20:02:02 <johnsom> Yes, also as sbalukoff mentioned, voting for summit sessions is now open
20:02:40 <bana_k> Hi
20:03:05 <diltram> hey
20:03:33 <johnsom> We have "Load Balancing as a Service and Octavia, Newton and Beyond" up there for votes, so vote early, vote often....
20:03:36 <johnsom> Grin
20:03:41 <sbalukoff> :)
20:03:51 <blogan> ive never seen that talk
20:04:07 <sbalukoff> Well, that's because the release name keeps changing.
20:04:19 <johnsom> blogan That is because you just sign up to talk and then bow out...  Grin.  JK, you have presented....
20:04:50 <johnsom> Any other announcements before we move on to progress/patches?
20:05:05 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
20:05:17 <TrevorV> I have no progress reports.. the internal focus continues :(
20:05:21 <blogan> this will be the 2nd one i dont do
20:05:45 <chenli> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342695/  Use seperate security group for o-hm0 port in devstack
20:05:48 <sbalukoff> I should have a lot more time to work on upstream stuff in the next few weeks leading up to the mid-cycle. My plan is to tackle documentation unless my superiors give me other priorities.
20:06:24 <sbalukoff> chenli: I'll have a look at that this week.
20:06:26 <johnsom> Ok, I have been working on the failover flow issue with network namespaces.  I have things working except for the multi-net scenario, but I am working on that today.  Sorry to say it has become a bit of a conflict magnet with the number of changes required, but it will be good to get fixed.
20:06:41 <sbalukoff> +1
20:06:58 <chenli> updated based on comments, and tested already  :)
20:06:58 <chenli> sbalukoff:  Thanks. :)
20:07:23 <johnsom> Cool, thanks chenli.  I know there was some confusion on that one.
20:07:52 <johnsom> Any other high priority patches needing review?
20:08:19 <sbalukoff> I know we banged out a bunch in the last couple weeks. So yay for that, eh!
20:08:39 <johnsom> Yeah, and two reverts, so let's not bang them out too fast.....
20:08:44 <sbalukoff> Heh!
20:08:46 <chenli> Also this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347121/.  Remove network from amphorae when delete a member.  But haven't tested yet...
20:08:46 <chenli> A small fix:  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347670/ : Fix issue when convert python .isoformat() string back into datetime object
20:09:52 <johnsom> 347121 Will need some close review.  We had previously decided not to un-plug networks from amps, so there are places that expect that they will be there in the code.
20:10:10 <johnsom> So, cores, pay special attention and testing on that one
20:10:30 <xgerman> o/
20:10:38 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
20:10:58 <chenli> johnsom: o ? sorry, I do not know that.  What is the reason not to un-plug networks ?
20:11:17 <johnsom> There is a high level list of topics for the mid-cycle on the etherpad.  Please add to it if you have ideas for other things we need to discuss or work on at the mid-cycle
20:11:57 <chenli> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333800/ Has another one need discussion, about how to set the pending_status_timeout for loadbalancer..
20:12:03 <xgerman> chenli there are/have been grand container plans
20:12:37 <johnsom> chenli I think it was to simplify the amphora management process.
20:13:23 <johnsom> Yeah, 333800 the timeout patch.  I really feel strongly that this is the wrong approach to solve this problem.  This is a good one for the cores to comment on.
20:13:34 <sbalukoff> So, no good reason, but code has been built potentially with assumptions, so thorough testing is needed.
20:13:47 <johnsom> sbalukoff +1
20:14:18 <sbalukoff> johnsom: I'll have a good look and think 333800 over, eh.
20:14:25 <johnsom> Thanks!
20:15:00 <johnsom> Any other topics for open discussion?
20:15:10 <sbalukoff> Short meeting today, eh!
20:15:47 <sbalukoff> (Works out OK for me, as afternoon training session is about to start.)
20:15:47 <johnsom> Yeah.  I'm really happy to seem new names on patches and in the channel...  Things are rolling along
20:16:10 <sbalukoff> Yeah, that has been good to see. :)
20:16:40 <johnsom> chenli Was there more you wanted to discuss on the 333800 or just wait for the comments on the patch?
20:16:54 <johnsom> I know you stayed up late for the meeting
20:18:16 <johnsom> Ok, maybe we lost them.  Thanks folks.  Short one today.
20:18:23 <sbalukoff> Have a good one!
20:18:32 <diltram> thx, have a good night/day
20:18:36 <johnsom> #endmeeting