20:00:08 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
20:00:08 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov  1 20:00:08 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00:09 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
20:00:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
20:00:16 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/neutron-lbaas master: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/516955
20:00:24 <johnsom> Hi folks
20:00:29 <longstaff> hi
20:00:29 <jniesz> hi
20:00:46 <johnsom> Time for another installment of "Fun with Octavia"
20:00:57 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
20:01:02 <xgerman_> o/
20:01:10 <johnsom> Queens MS1 release released last week
20:01:38 <johnsom> It was delayed due to release gate issues with zuul v3, but it did finally go out.
20:01:49 <johnsom> OpenStack Summit Sydney is next week, November 6-8th
20:02:10 <johnsom> Some people may be attending and might not be as available on IRC.
20:02:16 <johnsom> (I am not attending)
20:02:32 <johnsom> Any other announcements of note this week?
20:03:08 <johnsom> Ok, moving on
20:03:15 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
20:03:32 <johnsom> Just a reminder, we have an open spec for review on the provider drivers:
20:03:39 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/509957
20:04:01 <johnsom> Please contribute and help us review so it can be the spec we all want it to be.
20:04:41 <johnsom> It is on revision 3 and the title is currently incorrect, but we can keep commenting
20:05:46 <johnsom> Otherwise I have been working on zuul v3 issues, fixing gate breakage (cryptography 2.1), and working around the instance failures at OVH for the gate jobs.
20:06:14 <johnsom> I have some back ports to do and some more zuul v3 work on the stable branches.
20:06:58 <johnsom> We also need to get a scenario gate or two setup for our tempest plugin work.  I may work on that if rm_work isn't able to start that.
20:07:26 <johnsom> Any other progress reports?
20:07:55 <johnsom> This dashboard patch could use some core attention too: https://review.openstack.org/513086
20:08:25 <johnsom> And this bug with child object provisioning status:
20:08:31 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/513086
20:08:42 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/514867/
20:09:09 <johnsom> Any other bugs to discuss?
20:09:13 <jniesz> johnsom: any update regarding Fix allowed_address_pairs network driver to be more tolerant to failure
20:09:33 <johnsom> jniesz Just that I haven't got back around to work on that
20:09:52 <jniesz> ok, and was the last one related to the issue I raised or is that separate?
20:10:39 <johnsom> jniesz It was related to the issues you were seeing
20:11:50 <johnsom> So, half the battle
20:11:53 <johnsom> grin
20:11:55 <jniesz> : )
20:12:33 <johnsom> Ok, if there aren't any other progress reports/bugs to discuss, I will move on to the next topic.
20:12:44 <johnsom> #topic UDP load balancing
20:13:12 <johnsom> We have an open RFE that has some use case data now:
20:13:19 <johnsom> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/1657091
20:13:43 <johnsom> Feel free to comment on this RFE story.
20:13:59 <johnsom> I think the next step is a spec for this.
20:15:37 <johnsom> My expectation is an initial implementation can be done with LVS sideloaded in our existing amphora image, with the amphora agent updated to include support for configuring it when a UDP listener comes in.
20:16:02 <johnsom> Kind of a keep it simple approach.
20:16:09 <jniesz> I think UDP option makes sense, and it is something I would like to implement with L3 distributor
20:16:52 <johnsom> Yeah, that can certainly be a follow on step.
20:17:06 <jniesz> Important thing is that spec allows for different implementations of UDP LB
20:17:21 <johnsom> Initially I'm thinking we should just do standalone, maybe atc/stdby to get the base stuff, API etc. worked out.
20:17:54 <johnsom> Yep.  Please help review to make sure we don't make a mistake
20:18:16 <jniesz> yes, I can review spec when it is posted
20:18:41 <johnsom> Any other discussion on this?
20:19:07 <xgerman_> we should be careful not to duplicate work with ACTIVE-ACTIVE LVS
20:19:43 <xgerman_> also I think we will need keepalived to manage the health of the UDP members…
20:19:46 <johnsom> Yeah, I think it's 100% different, so really should not overlap
20:20:18 <xgerman_> I think it overlaps — for instance you would use the same dib element
20:20:23 <johnsom> There isn't even a spec for act/act LVS yet, so not a lot there anyway
20:21:07 <johnsom> I'm not sure we need a DIB element for UDP.  The existing keepalived element should cover everything for UDP
20:21:32 <xgerman_> we will need ipvsadm on the amp to get sdiagnostic info
20:21:41 <xgerman_> and debug
20:22:13 <johnsom> Maybe to get stats
20:22:18 <xgerman_> yep
20:22:29 <johnsom> We will see.
20:23:31 <johnsom> Anything else?
20:23:58 <johnsom> Cool, I think we have a path forward and someone willing to work on it.
20:24:33 <johnsom> I guess I should say, able to work on it...  So much stuff we could do, just prioritizing...
20:24:45 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
20:24:52 <johnsom> So this just happened:
20:24:55 <johnsom> #link https://twitter.com/knelson92/status/925818114813464576
20:25:14 <johnsom> They didn't make stickers for the PTG, but have now.
20:25:23 <xgerman_> rm_work I will put trust in you to send me some from Sydney
20:25:31 <johnsom> Kendall will try to find rm_work to give them to.
20:26:06 <johnsom> If you are at the summit you can catch rm_work to get one.  Otherwise we will figure out how to get them to Dublin for the next PTG
20:26:27 <rm_work> derp
20:26:31 <rm_work> disconnected from IRC and didn't notice >_>
20:27:17 <johnsom> Well, a bit of scroll  back then....
20:27:41 <johnsom> rm_work Kendall will get you the peacock stickers in Sydney
20:28:21 <johnsom> Any other topics for open discussion today?
20:28:32 <rm_work> yeah just got through it
20:28:59 <rm_work> umm
20:29:21 <rm_work> nothing here :P
20:29:26 <johnsom> Hahaha
20:29:46 <johnsom> Ok.  Thanks folks.  Please help with reviews!
20:29:52 <johnsom> #endmeeting