20:00:03 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
20:00:03 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov 15 20:00:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00:04 <xgerman_> ah, RAX timeserver
20:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
20:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
20:00:24 <johnsom> My two computers and meetbot says you are wrong....
20:00:42 <johnsom> Hi folks.
20:00:53 <nmagnezi> o/
20:00:54 <johnsom> xgerman_ is going to go fix his NTP....  grin
20:00:57 <longstaff> hi
20:01:40 <johnsom> Pretty light agenda today
20:01:41 <xgerman_> yep, switched to Apple…
20:01:50 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
20:01:59 <nmagnezi> xgerman_, i didn't know they ship NTP :P
20:02:05 <johnsom> I don't have any big OpenStack announcements
20:02:16 <johnsom> Anyone else have announcements this week?
20:02:52 <johnsom> Ok
20:02:58 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
20:03:05 <johnsom> Pretty quiet after the summit
20:03:33 <nmagnezi> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/503638/
20:03:39 <nmagnezi> took me some time to finalize it
20:03:42 <nmagnezi> ready for feedback
20:03:54 <nmagnezi> should be easy to review i think
20:04:02 <johnsom> I have been working on some minor bug fixes for things I came across.  I also setup a gate for our tempest plugin work.
20:04:39 <johnsom> I have pivoted back to looking at Active/Active and have started to clean up those patches.  I expect this to be my focus for a while now.
20:04:45 <xgerman_> did some reviewing…
20:05:02 <nmagnezi> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519709/
20:05:06 <nmagnezi> the gate patch
20:05:22 <johnsom> Nir, great news on the plugin update, I will take a look
20:06:03 <johnsom> Just a reminder, there is a link for open octavia reviews: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/(project:openstack/octavia+OR+project:openstack/octavia-dashboard+OR+project:openstack/python-octaviaclient+OR+project:openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin)+AND+status:open+AND+NOT+label:Code-Review%253C0+AND+NOT+label:Verified%253C%253D0+AND+NOT+label:Workflow%253C0
20:06:08 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/(project:openstack/octavia+OR+project:openstack/octavia-dashboard+OR+project:openstack/python-octaviaclient+OR+project:openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin)+AND+status:open+AND+NOT+label:Code-Review%253C0+AND+NOT+label:Verified%253C%253D0+AND+NOT+label:Workflow%253C0
20:06:32 <johnsom> Though some things there should have workflow -1 on them
20:07:06 <johnsom> Any other updates?
20:07:32 <johnsom> #topic Provider driver spec
20:07:33 <nmagnezi> I just add our repos to watched projects in gerrit
20:07:38 <nmagnezi> works nice for me..
20:07:43 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/509957
20:08:17 <johnsom> A reminder, our priority spec review is the provider driver.  There have been recent updates, so please re-review or review if you have not done so.
20:08:41 <nmagnezi> will do. fully agree about the priority.
20:08:51 <johnsom> Any discussion on this spec today?
20:09:11 <xgerman_> it was still pretty incomplete when I looked yesterday
20:09:25 <johnsom> It's our last hurdle to starting the neutron-lbaas deprecation clock
20:09:35 <longstaff> I pushed another set of changes this morning
20:10:04 <jniesz> we are waiting on it as well to continue  flavor implementation
20:10:05 <johnsom> xgerman_ Please comment on anything that is missing in that patch.
20:10:25 <xgerman_> yep, I did
20:11:09 <johnsom> Cool.  jniesz I haven't seen any comments from you on that patch in a while....  grin
20:11:54 <jniesz> yes, will try to re-review
20:11:55 <johnsom> Our goal is to have a clear design that people can take and run with.
20:11:58 <johnsom> Thanks
20:12:05 <jniesz> this week is busy, with our offsite
20:12:14 <johnsom> Ok, enough beating on people for reviews...  grin
20:12:28 <johnsom> #topic UDP protocol support spec
20:12:51 <xgerman_> Ok, I reviewed that as well - needs some work
20:13:00 <johnsom> A note, we also have another proposed spec for adding UDP protocol.  If you have already reviewed the provider driver, comments here are welcome too
20:13:11 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/503606
20:13:55 <johnsom> I have yet to review that, but will
20:14:11 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
20:14:14 <xgerman_> yeah, we really need to get moving on those. Q-2 is closer than people might think
20:14:20 <johnsom> Any other topics today?
20:15:00 <johnsom> Yes, and I would prioritize provider driver over UDP.  If UDP doesn't make Queens it's less of a problem for us than provider driver.
20:16:24 <johnsom> No other discussion items today?
20:16:44 <nmagnezi> nothing on my end
20:17:12 <johnsom> Cool, time back to review!  Thanks folks!
20:17:17 <nmagnezi> o/
20:17:18 <johnsom> #endmeeting