20:00:03 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia 20:00:03 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov 15 20:00:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:04 <xgerman_> ah, RAX timeserver 20:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 20:00:24 <johnsom> My two computers and meetbot says you are wrong.... 20:00:42 <johnsom> Hi folks. 20:00:53 <nmagnezi> o/ 20:00:54 <johnsom> xgerman_ is going to go fix his NTP.... grin 20:00:57 <longstaff> hi 20:01:40 <johnsom> Pretty light agenda today 20:01:41 <xgerman_> yep, switched to Apple… 20:01:50 <johnsom> #topic Announcements 20:01:59 <nmagnezi> xgerman_, i didn't know they ship NTP :P 20:02:05 <johnsom> I don't have any big OpenStack announcements 20:02:16 <johnsom> Anyone else have announcements this week? 20:02:52 <johnsom> Ok 20:02:58 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 20:03:05 <johnsom> Pretty quiet after the summit 20:03:33 <nmagnezi> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/503638/ 20:03:39 <nmagnezi> took me some time to finalize it 20:03:42 <nmagnezi> ready for feedback 20:03:54 <nmagnezi> should be easy to review i think 20:04:02 <johnsom> I have been working on some minor bug fixes for things I came across. I also setup a gate for our tempest plugin work. 20:04:39 <johnsom> I have pivoted back to looking at Active/Active and have started to clean up those patches. I expect this to be my focus for a while now. 20:04:45 <xgerman_> did some reviewing… 20:05:02 <nmagnezi> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519709/ 20:05:06 <nmagnezi> the gate patch 20:05:22 <johnsom> Nir, great news on the plugin update, I will take a look 20:06:03 <johnsom> Just a reminder, there is a link for open octavia reviews: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/(project:openstack/octavia+OR+project:openstack/octavia-dashboard+OR+project:openstack/python-octaviaclient+OR+project:openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin)+AND+status:open+AND+NOT+label:Code-Review%253C0+AND+NOT+label:Verified%253C%253D0+AND+NOT+label:Workflow%253C0 20:06:08 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/(project:openstack/octavia+OR+project:openstack/octavia-dashboard+OR+project:openstack/python-octaviaclient+OR+project:openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin)+AND+status:open+AND+NOT+label:Code-Review%253C0+AND+NOT+label:Verified%253C%253D0+AND+NOT+label:Workflow%253C0 20:06:32 <johnsom> Though some things there should have workflow -1 on them 20:07:06 <johnsom> Any other updates? 20:07:32 <johnsom> #topic Provider driver spec 20:07:33 <nmagnezi> I just add our repos to watched projects in gerrit 20:07:38 <nmagnezi> works nice for me.. 20:07:43 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/509957 20:08:17 <johnsom> A reminder, our priority spec review is the provider driver. There have been recent updates, so please re-review or review if you have not done so. 20:08:41 <nmagnezi> will do. fully agree about the priority. 20:08:51 <johnsom> Any discussion on this spec today? 20:09:11 <xgerman_> it was still pretty incomplete when I looked yesterday 20:09:25 <johnsom> It's our last hurdle to starting the neutron-lbaas deprecation clock 20:09:35 <longstaff> I pushed another set of changes this morning 20:10:04 <jniesz> we are waiting on it as well to continue flavor implementation 20:10:05 <johnsom> xgerman_ Please comment on anything that is missing in that patch. 20:10:25 <xgerman_> yep, I did 20:11:09 <johnsom> Cool. jniesz I haven't seen any comments from you on that patch in a while.... grin 20:11:54 <jniesz> yes, will try to re-review 20:11:55 <johnsom> Our goal is to have a clear design that people can take and run with. 20:11:58 <johnsom> Thanks 20:12:05 <jniesz> this week is busy, with our offsite 20:12:14 <johnsom> Ok, enough beating on people for reviews... grin 20:12:28 <johnsom> #topic UDP protocol support spec 20:12:51 <xgerman_> Ok, I reviewed that as well - needs some work 20:13:00 <johnsom> A note, we also have another proposed spec for adding UDP protocol. If you have already reviewed the provider driver, comments here are welcome too 20:13:11 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/503606 20:13:55 <johnsom> I have yet to review that, but will 20:14:11 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion 20:14:14 <xgerman_> yeah, we really need to get moving on those. Q-2 is closer than people might think 20:14:20 <johnsom> Any other topics today? 20:15:00 <johnsom> Yes, and I would prioritize provider driver over UDP. If UDP doesn't make Queens it's less of a problem for us than provider driver. 20:16:24 <johnsom> No other discussion items today? 20:16:44 <nmagnezi> nothing on my end 20:17:12 <johnsom> Cool, time back to review! Thanks folks! 20:17:17 <nmagnezi> o/ 20:17:18 <johnsom> #endmeeting