16:00:05 #startmeeting Octavia 16:00:06 Meeting started Wed Jul 31 16:00:05 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cgoncalves. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:10 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 16:00:20 o/ 16:00:26 hi 16:00:32 hi 16:00:35 o/ 16:01:06 our PTL is unavailable today, so he asked me to run the meeting 16:01:21 the agenda is https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Octavia/Weekly_Meeting_Agenda#Meeting_2019-07-31 16:01:42 as a reminder, feel empowered to add items to the agenda at any time! 16:01:55 #topic Announcements 16:02:46 TC election is coming up 16:02:52 the User Committee sent out an email to the -discuss list reminding folks that the OpenStack User Survey is still open. it will close on August 22 16:02:55 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-July/008098.html 16:02:57 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-July/007898.html 16:03:25 Yes, please fill out the user survey, it helps some of us justify their jobs, etc. 16:03:53 hands up for johnsom as new TC member :) 16:03:54 o/ 16:04:03 lol 16:04:12 Careful what you wish for.... 16:04:57 I'm sure you'd excel at it! :) 16:05:15 any other announcements or comments on these two announcements? 16:05:59 ok, moving on 16:06:10 #topic Gerrit ACLs for Backport-Candidate 16:06:37 So far I kind of like having the the backport flag 16:07:09 so, gthiemonge brought to the core team attention that non-core reviewers cannot vote -1/0/+1 on backport candidate label 16:07:26 Hmm, this is a total oversight on my part if anyone can't vote +-1 for backports. 16:07:35 I think there's good value in having non-cores also contributing with their vote 16:07:48 would anyone disagree? 16:07:56 Opps, that was not the intent. Everyone should be able to vote on that 16:08:31 I submitted a patch to allow "Registered Users" to vote on backports 16:08:35 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673764/ 16:08:44 please have a look and vote 16:09:09 gthiemonge, thank you for bringing this to the core team attention! 16:09:35 looking forward to seeing everyone voting on backports, as well as doing the actual backport work :) 16:10:12 Yes, thanks for letting us know! 16:10:13 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 16:10:26 1, 2, 3. go! 16:11:16 I have been busy finishing the octavia-lib get patches. We now have a fancy functional test that actually spins up the driver agent and uses the octavia-lib to get information. 16:11:50 I also setup scenario tests for the log offloading to check that off my list. 16:12:24 refreshed a woefully outdated amp build job with the latest in stable/stein and have a control plane upgraded in-place in lab successfully to stein. testing it in preparation for upgrading across all envs 16:12:25 nice! 16:12:30 I plan to start on the long-lived-provider-processes RFE and then move to focus on fixing the failover flows to be better. 16:13:15 Plus I have been doing reviews and trying to stay on top of the priority patch list. 16:14:43 yeah, +30 patches were merged since last meeting. 16:15:09 Yeah, we are making super progress on getting reviews done, but there is still more work to do! 16:15:26 I think one import milestone was the merge of the multi-listener LBs 16:15:27 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/Idaccbcfa0126f1e26fbb3ad770c65c9266cfad5b 16:15:44 thanks to Michael and Adam for awesome work there 16:16:10 Yes, that has been needed for some time. Thanks to Adam for helping me with that effort. 16:16:40 yeah really stoked about that one! 16:18:03 I submitted small patches for different fronts: increase timeouts for the centos job, add missing lib dependencies to requirements.txt, switch fedora amp image to minimal + upgrade to fedora 29 (latest available in DIB), and other small fixes here and there 16:19:57 anyone else would like to share progress and/or raise patches needing review? 16:20:47 I mean, there are plenty of patches needing review :) I mean patches needing higher priority over others ;) 16:21:38 please also feel empowered to help maintaining the priority review list 16:21:40 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/octavia-priority-reviews 16:22:40 Please add anything missing to the list or the "awaiting prioritization" section. 16:23:42 ok, should we move on to open discussion? 16:24:18 #topic Open discussion 16:25:32 would anyone like to see something discussing while we're all here? we have still 35 minutes left :) 16:26:45 any official word on any vendors contributing provider drivers to the project? seems like it's been a while since someone asked 16:26:46 It would be super cool if we could merge this: 16:26:48 #link https://review.opendev.org/673681 16:26:58 So we can cut an octavia-lib release. 16:28:05 colin-, OVN and VMware have been working actively on their provider drivers 16:29:12 johnsom worked on the getters in octavia-lib. it was something needed by VMware and was discussed here on the channel 16:30:15 Yes. I think there is one other vendor that has a working driver in their lab. 16:33:09 good to hear :) just clicked on the vendors section of the octavia piece of the user survey so it was top of mind 16:34:33 the providers framework is relatively new. even though it's been around since Rocky, Stein further consolidated that framework with the driver agent and now in Train with additional features in that area 16:35:19 yeah, the user survey may help vendors accelerate their provider drivers 16:36:24 the project has been very open to hear from vendors on their requirements, and working nicely with the two providers before mentioned (again, kudos to Michael) 16:38:34 oki doki. if there's nothing else to discuss today, we can close the meeting 16:39:25 o/ Thanks for running the meeting. 16:39:27 thank you, everyone! we meet again next week. the channel is open 24//7! 16:39:33 #endmeetnig 16:39:35 ttyl 16:39:36 #endmeeting