16:01:05 <rm_work> #startmeeting Octavia
16:01:06 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 22 16:01:05 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rm_work. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:08 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:01:13 <rm_work> #chair johnsom
16:01:14 <openstack> Current chairs: johnsom rm_work
16:01:15 <rm_work> #chair cgoncalves
16:01:16 <openstack> Current chairs: cgoncalves johnsom rm_work
16:01:17 <ataraday_> hi
16:01:22 <rm_work> o/
16:01:23 <cgoncalves> hi
16:01:29 <johnsom> o/
16:02:00 <rm_work> #topic Announcements
16:02:06 <rm_work> first: Ussuri RC1 is tomorrow! oof
16:02:31 <rm_work> it seemed so far away and then it's suddenly here
16:02:39 <rm_work> guess failover refactor isn't going to happen in U
16:02:44 <johnsom> Yeah, dashboard and tempest released last night
16:02:48 <johnsom> I wasn't expecting that
16:02:53 <rm_work> I was hoping T_T
16:03:11 <rm_work> also: OpenDev virtual events!
16:03:13 <rm_work> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-April/014297.html
16:03:19 <rm_work> We need to pick timeslots
16:03:27 <rm_work> we'll discuss that later tho
16:03:32 <johnsom> Well, that is just another branch to backport it through
16:03:40 <rm_work> oh this is different
16:03:59 <rm_work> well anyway, there's a virtual PTG coming up and we need to pick timeslots later in the meeting, but let me figure out what this is about...
16:04:09 <rm_work> or maybe whoever put it on the agenda can summarize?
16:04:24 <johnsom> Me\
16:04:50 <johnsom> So, there are "summit presentations", if you want to do one there is a very short timeline to submit
16:05:01 <johnsom> That is the "OpenDev" agenda item
16:05:29 <johnsom> That is more of an FYi. item
16:06:20 <rm_work> kk
16:06:30 <rm_work> next up:
16:06:32 <rm_work> Ussuri Community Meeting Proposal!
16:06:37 <rm_work> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-April/014293.html
16:06:55 <johnsom> This one is, does the team want to do a "highlights" talking segment
16:07:19 <johnsom> I am open to doing that if the team thinks it would be valuable/good idea. Or someone else can be the talking head.
16:08:17 * rm_work shrugs
16:08:24 <rm_work> could be good to do, if it's just a short thing
16:08:54 <rm_work> can just read from the highlights list you already made
16:09:40 <rm_work> if you are good with doing that, fine by me :D
16:09:46 <openstackgerrit> Chung Phan proposed openstack/octavia master:  fix use or the condition  https://review.opendev.org/722053
16:10:30 <rm_work> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:10:32 <johnsom> Ok, if no one else wants to do it, but we think it is an ok idea, I will respond
16:10:59 <rm_work> I heard cgoncalves reorganized the priority list?
16:11:15 <cgoncalves> I did clean it up a bit, yes
16:11:20 <rm_work> thanks for that :)
16:11:22 <rm_work> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/octavia-priority-reviews
16:11:41 <johnsom> I have been sidelined with python3 related issues, sqlalchemy issues, etc. Mostly working on reviews at this point.
16:11:43 <rm_work> will go through that probably today and see if I can make any progress on those
16:11:51 <johnsom> I hope to start the failover "v2" patch soon-ish
16:14:46 <cgoncalves> FYI, with https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702921/ merged, our CI jobs should run faster now. if you see random gate issues please let me know
16:16:09 <rm_work> ok, anything else for patches?
16:19:02 <openstackgerrit> Chung Phan proposed openstack/octavia master: fix healthmonitor not update amphora health when LB disable Story: 2007587  https://review.opendev.org/721816
16:19:07 <rm_work> ok guess not
16:19:09 <rm_work> #topic Virtual PTG (June 1-5)
16:19:18 <rm_work> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-April/014126.html
16:19:52 <rm_work> err I really should be giving these links some description probably, forget if the syntax for that is just... any text after the link?
16:19:54 <rm_work> well anyway
16:19:58 <rm_work> we need to pick timeslots!
16:20:20 <rm_work> Should we make our normal PTG etherpad with an attendance list and some timeslot voting?
16:20:25 <rm_work> answer: yes
16:21:00 <rm_work> I forget if there is a naming scheme tho
16:21:15 <johnsom> Ah, yeah, I can create that
16:22:10 <johnsom> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/octavia-virtual-V-ptg
16:22:10 <cgoncalves> thanks! the list is really useful
16:25:18 <johnsom> We need to know how many people will plan to attend our session and when we want it
16:25:35 <johnsom> So let's pick days/timeslots
16:27:20 <johnsom> Of these three timeslots what is better for folks?
16:27:23 <johnsom> 13-17UTC, 21-1UTC, 4-8UTC)
16:27:30 <johnsom> Oh, maybe I should do a vote! grin
16:27:39 <rm_work> I'd just put it on the etherpad
16:27:48 <rm_work> i don't know if we want to get consensus right now
16:27:53 <rm_work> might want to give it a day or two
16:28:59 <johnsom> Yeah, I think how many people are attending is most important today
16:30:26 <xgerman> You have limited virtual space?
16:30:27 <johnsom> How many days do we want to meet?
16:31:52 <johnsom> I don't think it is limited, but I think they are gauging in case the number gets large enough a special accommodation is needed.
16:32:06 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard stable/stein: Fix auth url for Barbican client  https://review.opendev.org/705008
16:32:09 <johnsom> I.e. some conferencing tools have limits per room, etc.
16:32:12 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard stable/queens: Fix auth url for Barbican client  https://review.opendev.org/705011
16:32:20 <rm_work> yeah i don't think that will be a problem for us lol
16:34:10 <johnsom> Ok, we can give the etherpad until Friday
16:35:20 <johnsom> Any comments on how many days we want?
16:35:29 <johnsom> 1-4
16:35:37 <rm_work> 2 IMO
16:35:44 <johnsom> I would guess at least two
16:35:47 <cgoncalves> 2 maybe?
16:36:12 <rm_work> give people more than one option to attend, but we don't have nearly as full an agenda as last time I think?
16:36:24 <rm_work> tho might need to revisit metrics, sad that we didn't have time to get traction on that
16:36:29 <rm_work> it keeps coming up internally
16:36:36 <johnsom> Well, we need to put topic proposals in the etherpad. lol
16:36:59 <rm_work> yep
16:37:01 <johnsom> Yeah, metrics, notifications are both hot topics
16:37:04 <rm_work> we might be ahead a bit
16:37:10 <johnsom> Active/Active seems to come up again
16:37:36 <johnsom> Strategy for handling HTTP/2 (aka haproxy 2.0)
16:38:12 <cgoncalves> +1
16:38:26 <xgerman> what about HTTP/3?
16:38:42 <johnsom> Yeah, HTTP/3 is soon if not ratified now
16:40:47 <johnsom> Ok, good start on topics. Please continue to add ideas
16:42:13 <rm_work> how about CentOS 8 getting bugfix releases? :D
16:42:26 * rm_work pokes RedHat folks
16:42:37 <johnsom> How about CentOS gate jobs?
16:42:44 <cgoncalves> Red<whitespace>Hat
16:42:57 <cgoncalves> sigh, yeah :/
16:43:31 <rm_work> don't we have a centos gate job?
16:43:44 <johnsom> Not really at the moment
16:43:50 <cgoncalves> centos 8 is not yet supported in devstack
16:44:02 <rm_work> ah right bleh
16:44:06 <rm_work> that was cent7
16:44:17 <johnsom> And it times out....
16:44:22 <rm_work> and it ... seems to have simply disappeared
16:44:22 <cgoncalves> there is a patch open that tests centos8 controller + amphora. it works but depends on support in devstack (WIP)
16:44:50 <rm_work> wait why is support for cent8 needed in devstack?
16:44:51 <cgoncalves> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698450/
16:44:57 <rm_work> if DIB supports it that's all we need
16:45:14 <cgoncalves> if you just want to test centos8 amps, yes
16:45:22 <rm_work> yeah that's pretty much all I want to test :D
16:45:32 <rm_work> but anyway, rabbitholing
16:45:48 <cgoncalves> problem is the timeouts :/
16:46:09 <rm_work> #topic Open Discussion
16:46:17 <rm_work> NOW we can discuss this if we want :D
16:46:24 <cgoncalves> EOL
16:46:26 <rm_work> unless someone has other stuff
16:46:42 <johnsom> We are at a point that multi-node gate jobs working is becoming critical IMO
16:47:08 <rm_work> did we determine if that is an Us problem or a Neutron problem?
16:47:33 <rm_work> or, rather a Base-job problem
16:47:57 <johnsom> I don't think so. My last attempt (many, many months ago) was a neutron problem where traffic wasn't passing to the secondary. But that is so out of date now I have no idea
16:51:35 <johnsom> Maybe I can kick the tires there again soon-ish
16:54:43 <openstackgerrit> Dawson Coleman proposed openstack/octavia master: Add TLS version configuration for pools  https://review.opendev.org/721773
16:54:45 <johnsom> xgerman were you going to announce an informal videa chat?
16:54:48 <rm_work> oh, so...
16:54:49 <johnsom> video chat?
16:54:51 <rm_work> yeah that
16:54:56 <xgerman> Sure. Let’s do it
16:54:58 <rm_work> I was about to mention :D
16:55:20 <xgerman> https://zuora.zoom.us/j/98282872612
16:55:46 <xgerman> Let’s see if that works - if not we use johnsom
16:55:51 <cgoncalves> can we not do zoom please? requiring an app is... :/
16:56:00 <johnsom> Cool, so this is a "happy hour, say hello" kind of chat, starting right after the Octavia meeting is over.
16:56:07 <xgerman> yep
16:56:20 <xgerman> and after we decide on the right video solution :-)
16:56:31 <rm_work> google meet/hangout/whatever is prolly fine?
16:56:45 <johnsom> I will give a google meet link here, just a sec
16:56:49 <cgoncalves> https://meet.google.com/puv-ifyy-btr
16:56:54 <cgoncalves> or yours, whatever :)
16:57:00 <johnsom> Ok, Use that ^^^
16:58:12 <johnsom> Anything else for open discussion?
16:59:25 <johnsom> Ok thank you folks! Catch you next week.
16:59:33 <johnsom> #endmeeting