16:00:25 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:26 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jun 24 16:00:25 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:27 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:55 <cgoncalves> hi
16:00:59 <johnsom> Hi everyone (anyone?)
16:00:59 <gthiemonge> hi
16:01:08 <aannuusshhkkaa> hey!
16:01:09 <shtepanie> hi
16:01:18 <haleyb> hi
16:01:35 <johnsom> Pretty light agenda today
16:01:37 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
16:02:34 <johnsom> I don't think I have any real announcements this week.
16:02:59 <johnsom> Time flies, we are now in the MS2 phase of Victoria
16:03:07 <johnsom> #link https://releases.openstack.org/victoria/schedule.html
16:03:58 <johnsom> There was an e-mail to the openstack-discuss list asking for input on multi-architecture Octavia.
16:04:21 <johnsom> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015579.html
16:04:31 <johnsom> Please add your input
16:04:39 <cgoncalves> just a note about the MS2, that we set to "Aspire to make AmphoraV2 the default driver at MS2 checkpoint" from the PTG
16:05:11 <johnsom> Right, that will be the end of July, so coming up quickly
16:06:00 <johnsom> We had some criteria for that on the PTG etherpad:
16:06:02 <johnsom> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/octavia-virtual-V-ptg
16:06:06 <johnsom> line 84
16:06:33 <cgoncalves> I agree with your reply email. I think Octavia can support multiple amphora architecture types and that can be done via Octavia flavors
16:07:05 <johnsom> Yeah, I don't think this is a bad thing. I just don't have any cycles to help that effort.
16:07:32 <johnsom> Any other announcements this week?
16:07:33 <cgoncalves> maybe the multi-arch SIG in openstack can help
16:08:45 <johnsom> Yep. I don't think it would be a lot of work to add architecture to the flavors. Just some time.
16:09:16 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:09:41 <johnsom> I have been busy with reviews and minor patches to fix / address a few issues.
16:09:57 <johnsom> I am also working on adding support for nftables to Octavia.
16:10:20 <johnsom> If you are not familiar, nftables is proposed to replace iptables. Debian buster has already made the switch.
16:10:54 <johnsom> It's just a slightly different syntax. Bionic supports it, but does not use it by default.
16:11:08 <gthiemonge> I'm working on the UDP health-monitor issues in tempest. I may have an idea, but I need to reproduce the bug with more debug messages to confirm it would work... Reproduction rate is really low, we hit that issue 3 times in the CI in the last 7 days
16:11:38 <cgoncalves> I worked on fixing the grenade job in multiple branches, patches are up for review. these are gate blockers.
16:11:53 <johnsom> Ah, are they good now? do you have a list?
16:12:19 <cgoncalves> I also fixed some oopsies in the failover refactor patch, thanks to the SDK for finding and reporting them!
16:12:44 <cgoncalves> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:octavia-grenade
16:13:06 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:octavia-grenade
16:13:07 <johnsom> Thanks!
16:13:40 <johnsom> Yeah, I noticed the timeout_dict wasn't there, but I saw it had a default and figured it didn't matter. I should have flagged it.
16:14:11 <cgoncalves> I took a few minutes to post a patch that adds amphora image tag capability to octavia flavors. needs is in line with the multi-arch email discussed earlier
16:14:44 <johnsom> On the grenade jobs, I assume we need to review from the oldest to the newest but I see the queens patch failed the gates. Do these just need rechecks?
16:15:23 <cgoncalves> order is:
16:15:24 <cgoncalves> 1. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/736965/1
16:15:32 <cgoncalves> 2. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/736824/
16:15:58 <cgoncalves> I will follow-up then with forward-portings to newer stable branches
16:16:37 <johnsom> Ok, thanks
16:16:39 <cgoncalves> we can't fix grenade in rocky and queens until devstack gets fixed after the new uwsgi release
16:16:55 <johnsom> Ah, that is still open?
16:17:10 <cgoncalves> looks like so
16:17:12 <cgoncalves> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735615/
16:17:38 <cgoncalves> this was caught in stable/rocky https://review.opendev.org/#/c/736825/
16:18:20 <johnsom> Ugh, ok
16:18:49 <johnsom> Any other updates?
16:19:29 <johnsom> I think shtepanie had a stats driver patch proposed as well.
16:20:10 <shtepanie> yup! continued to work on refactoring the driver with aannuusshhkkaa
16:20:11 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737111/
16:20:15 <shtepanie> and rm_work
16:20:34 <johnsom> Yeah, great! I think you are looking for early stage review feedback on the approach right?
16:20:40 <shtepanie> yes
16:21:20 <johnsom> Excellent.
16:21:36 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
16:21:44 <johnsom> Any other topics for today?
16:22:46 <ataraday_> I've got question about experimental jobs with amphorav2. Is there any guide how to create such jobs or does someone looked into it?
16:23:47 <johnsom> Yes, let me see what I can find
16:25:24 <cgoncalves> should be just adding an "experimental" section in zuul.d/projects.yaml like "gate", "periodic" and "check", no?
16:26:28 <johnsom> Yeah, I think so. I thought that was discussed in the project guide, but I'm not finding it right away
16:28:23 <ataraday_> I'm not really familiar how jobs created, so will check zuul.d/projects.yaml
16:29:05 <johnsom> Yeah, it would be a section at the bottom of projects.yaml. Where we have "gate" and "periodic" you would add a pipeline section for "experimental".
16:29:09 <cgoncalves> ataraday_, https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron/src/branch/master/zuul.d/project.yaml#L111
16:29:20 <cgoncalves> ^ just an example from neutron
16:29:26 <johnsom> Yeah, I was just going to look there.
16:29:45 <ataraday_> cgoncalves, Thanks!
16:30:44 <johnsom> There is some mention of it here: https://docs.opendev.org/opendev/system-config/latest/zuul.html but not much
16:32:03 <johnsom> I think to trigger it, you comment on the patch with "experimental"
16:32:38 <cgoncalves> thought it was "check-experimental"
16:33:08 <cgoncalves> "check experimental" actually
16:33:26 <johnsom> Yeah, ok. Ugh, wish that was easy to find in the infra docs
16:33:49 <johnsom> Yeah, I think "check experimental"
16:33:53 <johnsom> Thanks!
16:33:57 <ataraday_> got it
16:35:04 <johnsom> Any other topics today?
16:37:26 <johnsom> Ok, thanks everyone. Have a great week!
16:37:37 <johnsom> #endmeeting