16:00:18 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:19 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb 24 16:00:18 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:28 <johnsom> Hi everyone
16:01:00 <haleyb> hi
16:01:15 <gthiemonge> hi
16:01:21 * johnsom wondered if it was going to be a talking to himself meeting today
16:01:48 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
16:02:01 <johnsom> Final client release is NEXT WEEK
16:02:29 <johnsom> Please make sure your client patches for Wallaby have merged. Bug people if not.
16:02:43 <johnsom> We are coming to the end of the Wallaby development cycle.
16:03:20 <johnsom> #link https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html
16:03:36 <johnsom> Sorry, that is non-client libraries. Ugh,
16:03:41 <johnsom> so, octavia-lib
16:04:05 <johnsom> Also note: Feature freeze for everything else is the second week in March
16:04:24 <johnsom> We have a priority bug review list
16:04:33 <johnsom> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/octavia-priority-reviews
16:04:59 <johnsom> Any other announcements this week?
16:05:36 <mchlumsky> We finished our upgrade of octavia to Ussuri last week. 1500 amphoras all done. :)
16:05:48 <johnsom> Nice!
16:06:59 <johnsom> Good news is always nice to hear.
16:07:08 <mchlumsky> Really appreciated the quick response to issues in this channel!
16:07:18 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:08:30 <johnsom> I have finished the RBAC update to support the scoped tokens and new keystone roles. This maintains compatibility with our existing roles as much as possible. This is a bit of a big change coming in keystone/oslo_policy.
16:08:42 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/775957
16:09:38 <johnsom> Reviews would be great. That is an alternative approach to these patches:
16:09:41 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/octavia+status:open+owner:lbragstad%2540redhat.com
16:09:49 <gthiemonge> I reviewed/tested RBAC commit from johnsom, and I've spent some time fixing the gates
16:10:15 <johnsom> I have also started the work to expand our RBAC testing in tempest to cover the new personas.
16:10:41 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/776817
16:10:50 <johnsom> That is very Work In Progress however
16:11:35 <johnsom> gthiemonge Thanks for playing whack-a-mole to get our gates functional again after all of those dependent module changes.
16:12:16 <johnsom> Any other updates today?
16:12:34 <haleyb> i'll be bugging people for reviews of tempest changes i've proposed that should be able to merge with a green gate :)
16:15:12 <johnsom> Nice
16:15:16 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
16:15:22 <johnsom> Any other topics today?
16:16:30 <haleyb> question - is there anything we need to prioritize on the priority list for W?
16:16:45 <haleyb> besides RBAC
16:17:22 <johnsom> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/octavia-priority-reviews
16:17:27 <johnsom> grin. I had to do it.....
16:17:27 <gthiemonge> should we split the list into multiple lists? octavia-lib, features, etc...
16:17:31 <haleyb> or we can just individually assess and bug people
16:18:19 <johnsom> The intent of that list is to be a prioritized list. Things that need to land sooner should be at the top. Both for release timing but also dependency trees
16:18:28 <haleyb> 41+ patches won't merge in W, do we make sure to pick things that might do DB updates?
16:18:41 <johnsom> We have done over double that in previous releases
16:18:52 <haleyb> ok, i might move some things down that i know of
16:19:29 <gthiemonge> some commits are in merge conflict, I don't think folks will update them
16:19:48 <johnsom> Yeah, thank you to the folks that have updated this (Unfortunately I'm not driving this for this release). Please work together on making sure that priority list is as accurate as we can have it
16:21:19 <haleyb> gthiemonge: maybe we move merge conflicts down, and if someone fixes we move it back up?
16:21:35 <gthiemonge> haleyb: yes that sounds good
16:22:04 <gthiemonge> I'll move the non-merge conflict features on top
16:22:18 <gthiemonge> and client commit
16:22:19 <gthiemonge> s
16:22:38 <johnsom> Yeah, it looks like this list could use a prioritization scrub
16:23:15 <haleyb> thanks greg
16:23:44 <haleyb> i updated some of the +1/+2 but that was about it
16:30:05 * haleyb taps the mic
16:30:09 <johnsom> Ok, thanks for looking at the priority review list. Any other topics today?
16:30:23 <johnsom> Yeah, I had the same thought. grin
16:31:46 <johnsom> I should also mention here, I will be on vacation Friday through Monday. So very limited response from me.
16:33:15 <haleyb> i will be out tomorrow as well, per company edict :)
16:33:55 <johnsom> Ok, thanks everyone, chat with you all next week for the start of Wallaby feature freeze!
16:34:07 <johnsom> #endmeeting