16:00:25 #startmeeting Octavia 16:00:26 Meeting started Wed Apr 7 16:00:25 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:30 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 16:00:36 o/ 16:00:40 o/ 16:00:42 Hi everyone! 16:00:59 hi 16:01:09 Thanks johnsom for letting me run my first meeting ;-) 16:01:19 Oh, my pleasure! lol 16:01:29 I know :D 16:01:32 #topic Announcements 16:01:43 RC2 released 16:01:57 This is the last RC before the Wallaby release 16:02:15 It includes a last-minute patch to fix the ALPN compatibility with older amphora 16:02:16 Wahoo! 16:02:38 And another patch that failed to pass the gates before RC1 16:02:47 So I guess we're good now 16:03:15 master branch ready for Xena 16:03:38 Now that the stable/wallaby branch exists, we can start merging commits for the Xena release 16:03:59 I guess this is the time for "recheck"/"rebase" 16:04:29 Yep, onward to Xena 16:04:51 PTG etherpad - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-octavia 16:05:07 For those who missed the link, we have an etherpad for Octavia: 16:05:18 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-octavia 16:05:30 Please add any topics you would like to discuss 16:05:40 And don't forget to register for the PTG 16:05:49 #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ 16:06:05 Any other announcements this week? 16:06:48 I don't have anything 16:07:14 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 16:07:32 I've worked on some downstream stuff related to Octavia 16:08:03 I have been working on the backend re-encryption tests that started failing after the ALPN merge. 16:08:05 I also did a few patches for octavia-dashboard (bug fixes and some improvements) 16:08:05 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/760465 16:08:13 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/760471 16:08:28 Reviews would be welcome to get some test coverage for backend re-encryption. 16:08:53 Thank you to gthiemonge for helping out with that effort and finding the issue in the test server with ALPN 16:09:09 I have this feature patch that is waiting for reviews: "Add generic network interface management in the amphora" 16:09:19 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/761195 16:09:33 The scoped token patch is still open for review as well: 16:09:35 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/776817 16:09:53 I'd like to test it early in the cycle in case I introduced some huge bugs 16:09:56 Ah, yes, that would be a good change. I hope I can take a look this week 16:11:24 gthiemonge: i just had those minor comments on that one, otherwise looked good 16:11:57 haleyb: thanks! 16:12:21 Ok, let's move on 16:12:28 #topic Open Discussion 16:12:46 Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: Switch to using q35 machine type for Octavia jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/729391 16:12:56 We noticed that some periodic jobs for EOL stable branches (queens, rocky, stein) are still running 16:13:04 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Foctavia&pipeline=periodic-stable 16:13:18 I think we need to clean up that stuff during the X cycle 16:13:58 +1 16:14:06 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/758725 16:14:19 I'll probably ask for help from our former PTL johnsom 16:14:30 You mean rm_work? 16:14:33 * rm_work stumbles in pre-coffee 16:14:35 grin 16:15:06 Oh hey, the timing 16:15:12 cgoncalves: oh thanks! 16:15:13 I asked infra team the other day about this. it's a task on their to-do list and seems to be somewhat non-trivial 16:16:08 we've been reminding them about this for months now. no progress afaik 16:17:18 ah ok, so I presume that most of the openstack projects still have some old stable periodic jobs 16:17:53 Well, we can still remove them from the stable branches even if the branch isn't deleted. 16:18:35 Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: Remove legacy CI jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/758725 16:18:54 Just rebased that to kick the tires 16:19:33 cgoncalves: johnsom: thanks for working on it ;-) 16:19:37 Speaking of rebasing, in case the person who was interested in the multi-AZ patch is here, I did do most of the hard lifting on the rebase finally. I think it already needs another rebase, but it's minor. Not sure if it's working though as I no longer have an easy test-bed. Won't be able to get to that for about a quarter, but if they want to help test, I can assist. 16:21:11 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/558962 16:21:47 Ah, thanks 16:21:59 rm_work: I can rebase it until you're back 16:22:30 I mean, I can do it again, it's just I won't be able to try to spin up testing for it yet 16:23:35 It would be nice to have tempest coverage for that ..... For those of us without multi-az deployments 16:24:58 yeah we could reuse some code from the az_scenario tests (still open in octavia-tempest-plugin) 16:25:09 Yes, was working on multiple AZs in tempest for the main AZ patches that already merged, once that is in better shape I can take advantage of it 16:25:32 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/695349 16:25:36 I think I was just having issues with configuring multiple working AZs there 16:26:51 I need to double check the tempest results but I think it's ok now: https://ce653b590a63b482d73e-172f8f1388c135568979f569022c1ad6.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/695349/30/check/octavia-v2-dsvm-scenario-two-node/7414f4e/testr_results.html 16:28:07 Any other topics today? 16:29:15 Ok 16:29:20 Thanks everyone 16:29:25 #endmeeting