16:00:44 <gthiemonge> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:44 <openstack> Meeting started Wed May 19 16:00:44 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:47 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:57 <gthiemonge> Hi everyone!
16:01:08 <haleyb> hi
16:01:17 <johnsom> o/
16:02:05 <gthiemonge> #topic Announcements
16:02:43 <gthiemonge> Devstack dropped support for Ubuntu Bionic yesterday
16:03:03 <gthiemonge> so the gate for master is broken until we merge:
16:03:10 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/788954
16:03:20 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/791087
16:04:15 <gthiemonge> Any other announcements?
16:04:23 <johnsom> Fun
16:05:15 <gthiemonge> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:06:42 <gthiemonge> I was on PTO, I haven't done too much stuff... except a fix for python-octaviaclient, I added support for pagination for the list commands
16:06:51 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-octaviaclient/+/792122
16:07:14 <gthiemonge> so now, if you have more than 1000 LBs, loadbalancer list should work properly ;-)
16:07:15 <johnsom> I don't have a lot to report on Octavia, mostly just reviews, etc.
16:07:29 <johnsom> And opening bugs.... grin
16:08:21 <johnsom> I briefly looked at the virtual memory usage, but it's all python shared libraries and mmap files from what I saw. I abandoned the test patch for that.
16:09:25 <haleyb> i've just done reviews mostly, outside the ovn provider
16:10:41 <gthiemonge> #topic Transition Train to Extended Maintenance
16:10:51 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790762
16:11:00 <gthiemonge> cgoncalves: this is your topic ^
16:11:06 <cgoncalves> yes, thanks
16:11:28 <cgoncalves> the stable team proposed a patch to transition stable/train Octavia to extended maintenance (EM)
16:12:18 <cgoncalves> I checked at the time and there was one open backport patch. I think gthiemonge had some reservations to whether it that patch should be included or not given it might be a bit risky
16:12:49 <cgoncalves> meanwhile I also worked on proposing 23 backport patches across all active branches, and thus a few more were added to the open ones for stable/train
16:12:53 <cgoncalves> https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Foctavia+branch:stable%252Ftrain+status:open
16:13:19 <cgoncalves> I would like to highlight this and see how the community thinks it is best to proceed
16:13:21 <johnsom> cgoncalves Thank you for those backports
16:13:26 <gthiemonge> note that it is not a real backport, the patch contains a small part of a non-backportable commit from stable/ussuri
16:13:32 <cgoncalves> right
16:15:01 <johnsom> Maybe rm_work has some insight into if that patch can be changed to not require a Ussuri octavia-lib?
16:15:23 <cgoncalves> in my opinion it would be worth reviewing these open train backport patches, merge as many as possible, cut a release and tag it train-em
16:15:46 <johnsom> Yeah, I am in favor of that
16:15:56 <cgoncalves> good. go review them :P
16:16:17 <gthiemonge> +1
16:16:33 <johnsom> "It's on my list"
16:16:43 <johnsom> Seems like that should be a t-shirt
16:16:45 <gthiemonge> :-)
16:17:26 <johnsom> "Works on devstack" "It's on my review list" "It will be in x release" "I'll add tests for that"
16:17:43 <cgoncalves> ETOOMANYLISTS
16:17:56 <johnsom> +1
16:18:16 <johnsom> or -255 ???
16:18:26 <gthiemonge> thanks cgoncalves for raising the topic
16:18:38 <gthiemonge> #topic $series-eol delete problem
16:18:45 <gthiemonge> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022479.html
16:18:48 <cgoncalves> alright, review whenever possible. I think there isn't a real deadline but the sooner the better!
16:19:08 <gthiemonge> cgoncalves: ack
16:19:16 <gthiemonge> We were asked on openstack-discuss about the deletion of old stable branches
16:19:27 <gthiemonge> We have commits on top of stein and queens EOL tags
16:19:35 <gthiemonge> and this is an issue for the deletion
16:19:56 <gthiemonge> I think we backported/merged those patches by mistake (not paying attention to the eol branches?)
16:20:15 <gthiemonge> Do we agree to delete the branch and to lose those backports?
16:20:17 <johnsom> I pick option 2 "Delete the branch anyway and don't care about the lost patch(es)" The only reason there are patches is because that branch didn't get deleted when it should have.
16:20:35 <gthiemonge> yeah I agree
16:20:52 <gthiemonge> I think rm_work agreed too
16:21:03 <cgoncalves> works for me
16:21:29 <gthiemonge> alright
16:21:45 <gthiemonge> I'll reply to the email thread after the meeting
16:22:07 <cgoncalves> if someone badly wants them, they can be found in review.opendev.org and/or backported from newer stable branches
16:22:32 <gthiemonge> yeah
16:23:06 <gthiemonge> #topic Open Discussion
16:24:45 <gthiemonge> Any other topics today?
16:25:57 <gthiemonge> Ok, thanks everyone!
16:26:01 <gthiemonge> #endmeeting