16:00:44 #startmeeting Octavia 16:00:44 Meeting started Wed May 19 16:00:44 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:47 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 16:00:57 Hi everyone! 16:01:08 hi 16:01:17 o/ 16:02:05 #topic Announcements 16:02:43 Devstack dropped support for Ubuntu Bionic yesterday 16:03:03 so the gate for master is broken until we merge: 16:03:10 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/788954 16:03:20 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/791087 16:04:15 Any other announcements? 16:04:23 Fun 16:05:15 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 16:06:42 I was on PTO, I haven't done too much stuff... except a fix for python-octaviaclient, I added support for pagination for the list commands 16:06:51 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-octaviaclient/+/792122 16:07:14 so now, if you have more than 1000 LBs, loadbalancer list should work properly ;-) 16:07:15 I don't have a lot to report on Octavia, mostly just reviews, etc. 16:07:29 And opening bugs.... grin 16:08:21 I briefly looked at the virtual memory usage, but it's all python shared libraries and mmap files from what I saw. I abandoned the test patch for that. 16:09:25 i've just done reviews mostly, outside the ovn provider 16:10:41 #topic Transition Train to Extended Maintenance 16:10:51 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790762 16:11:00 cgoncalves: this is your topic ^ 16:11:06 yes, thanks 16:11:28 the stable team proposed a patch to transition stable/train Octavia to extended maintenance (EM) 16:12:18 I checked at the time and there was one open backport patch. I think gthiemonge had some reservations to whether it that patch should be included or not given it might be a bit risky 16:12:49 meanwhile I also worked on proposing 23 backport patches across all active branches, and thus a few more were added to the open ones for stable/train 16:12:53 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Foctavia+branch:stable%252Ftrain+status:open 16:13:19 I would like to highlight this and see how the community thinks it is best to proceed 16:13:21 cgoncalves Thank you for those backports 16:13:26 note that it is not a real backport, the patch contains a small part of a non-backportable commit from stable/ussuri 16:13:32 right 16:15:01 Maybe rm_work has some insight into if that patch can be changed to not require a Ussuri octavia-lib? 16:15:23 in my opinion it would be worth reviewing these open train backport patches, merge as many as possible, cut a release and tag it train-em 16:15:46 Yeah, I am in favor of that 16:15:56 good. go review them :P 16:16:17 +1 16:16:33 "It's on my list" 16:16:43 Seems like that should be a t-shirt 16:16:45 :-) 16:17:26 "Works on devstack" "It's on my review list" "It will be in x release" "I'll add tests for that" 16:17:43 ETOOMANYLISTS 16:17:56 +1 16:18:16 or -255 ??? 16:18:26 thanks cgoncalves for raising the topic 16:18:38 #topic $series-eol delete problem 16:18:45 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022479.html 16:18:48 alright, review whenever possible. I think there isn't a real deadline but the sooner the better! 16:19:08 cgoncalves: ack 16:19:16 We were asked on openstack-discuss about the deletion of old stable branches 16:19:27 We have commits on top of stein and queens EOL tags 16:19:35 and this is an issue for the deletion 16:19:56 I think we backported/merged those patches by mistake (not paying attention to the eol branches?) 16:20:15 Do we agree to delete the branch and to lose those backports? 16:20:17 I pick option 2 "Delete the branch anyway and don't care about the lost patch(es)" The only reason there are patches is because that branch didn't get deleted when it should have. 16:20:35 yeah I agree 16:20:52 I think rm_work agreed too 16:21:03 works for me 16:21:29 alright 16:21:45 I'll reply to the email thread after the meeting 16:22:07 if someone badly wants them, they can be found in review.opendev.org and/or backported from newer stable branches 16:22:32 yeah 16:23:06 #topic Open Discussion 16:24:45 Any other topics today? 16:25:57 Ok, thanks everyone! 16:26:01 #endmeeting