16:00:52 #startmeeting Octavia 16:00:53 Meeting started Wed Jun 9 16:00:52 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:56 The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' 16:01:02 o/ 16:01:09 Hi Folks 16:01:09 hi 16:01:49 #topic Announcements 16:02:08 ML2/OVN is now the default network backend in devstack 16:02:15 Our gates are back 16:02:31 IPv6 connectivity for the VIPs has been restored! 16:02:46 o/ 16:03:02 I haven't seen any other issues with the gates 16:03:13 perhaps I need to recheck the open review for the multinode job 16:03:16 Yeah, I haven't been able to get a devstack to go with OVN. I had to revert to OVS. 16:03:26 I see there are still some open devstack issues around this 16:03:33 gthiemonge: fyi there is at least one follow-on devstack patch to fix IPv6 issues w/OVN 16:04:08 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/795371 16:04:23 yeah I have a working devstack env with OVN, it was a bit painful to get there 16:04:48 Any tips or docs pointers? It's been a few days since I tried. 16:05:26 tap your heels together and repeat "OVN is great" :p 16:05:37 I asked in the channel "Any idea why devstack dies looking for /var/run/openvswitch/ovnnb_db.sock" here, but didn't get a response 16:05:44 Ha, well, ok. 16:05:46 I can provide my local.conf file 16:06:23 I may just need to create a fresh VM to make the conversion... I don't nkow 16:06:24 yeah that'd be great, i have yet to get a successful devstack build to happen 16:06:38 newer working local.conf would be A++ 16:07:31 I'll send it after the meeting (I need to remove some secrets ;-) 16:07:34 Yeah and a list of packages needed. I looked for a bindep but didn't find one. 16:07:42 +1 16:08:05 i'll check the local.conf in the OVN provider repo with the latest code too, it was working last week.... 16:08:31 Well I didn't have any package issue (on centos 8 stream), but I had to downgrade a nova-related package to spawn VMs 16:10:12 local.conf: 16:10:13 I tried installing everything I could think of, but it didn't help, so yeah, it may not be package related. 16:10:18 #link http://paste.openstack.org/show/806497/ 16:10:45 Thanks Greg 16:10:55 np 16:11:28 in case of issues, ping haleyb ;-) 16:11:55 I tried... 16:12:00 I am semi-distracted because I am trying to track down how our API is failing oddly on a member create -- may ping here after the meeting to see if anyone has seen issues recently 16:12:04 yes, or look in the ovn provider repo, it's different and builds from source 16:12:38 johnsom: i never saw the ping, sorry 16:12:53 No worries 16:14:05 Any other announcements? 16:14:21 We are going to retire #openstack-state-management 16:14:34 Please use #openstack-oslo for TaskFlow discussion going forward 16:14:57 Not that there has been much discussion in a while.... 16:14:59 ack 16:15:45 thanks johnsom 16:15:54 #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review 16:16:36 I've been working on a weird behavior with amphorav2+persistence, some tasks were executed twice (and concurrently) 16:17:11 For instance the octavia-worker created 2 VIP ports per amphora, and then it failed 16:17:17 I have mostly been on the review path recently. 16:17:25 (because the amphora cannot get 2 VIP ports) 16:17:42 I found out that the jobboard_expiration_time setting value (default 30sec) should never be greater that the duration of the longest task 16:17:59 My dev env was a bit loaded and the ComputeWait task took ~30sec 16:18:09 I detailed the issue in 16:18:14 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008956 16:18:18 (see the first comment) 16:18:57 No fix/code so far, but that was an interesting debugging session with amphorav2 16:21:43 And that would be great to get reviews on those python-octaviaclient patches: 16:22:03 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-octaviaclient/+/792122 16:22:10 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-octaviaclient/+/792688 16:22:37 I amended the 2nd patch, I don't know if I can review it :D 16:23:09 I think so. I'm the author. 16:23:19 Maybe we both do, but don't workflow? Grin 16:23:52 :D 16:23:57 Thanks for helping out with the test updates! I ran out of cycles I could give to that. 16:24:27 It looks like Ann reviewed, so just one more core needed 16:24:49 it passes the tests, but the change is not pretty 16:25:23 lol 16:26:11 Well, it will be a huge speed up for anyone with a large cloud. 16:27:22 #topic Open Discussion 16:27:34 any other topics today? 16:29:27 Ok! 16:29:33 Thanks Folks! 16:29:35 Thanks Greg 16:29:38 #endmeeting