16:00:55 <gthiemonge> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:55 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Mar 30 16:00:55 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:55 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:55 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:01:00 <gthiemonge> Hi
16:01:07 <spencerh`> Hello!
16:01:12 <tweining_> hi
16:01:14 <johnsom> o/
16:02:35 <gthiemonge> #topic Announcements
16:02:45 <gthiemonge> * Yoga is released!
16:02:53 <gthiemonge> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-announce/2022-March/002059.html
16:03:05 <gthiemonge> Congratulations! and Thank you!
16:03:27 <tweining_> nice job everyone!
16:03:35 <spencerh`> Awesome!
16:04:56 <gthiemonge> * PTG Next week!
16:05:02 <johnsom> Wahoo
16:05:11 <gthiemonge> Again, an announcement for the upcoming PTG
16:05:25 <gthiemonge> I hope I will see you there!
16:05:32 <gthiemonge> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-ptg-octavia
16:08:04 <gthiemonge> * Issues with nested virt pools for Centos
16:08:34 <gthiemonge> I saw a lot of NODE_FAILURE yesterday with our centos-*-stream and *-fips (also centos-based) jobs
16:08:59 <gthiemonge> it seems that a pool of hosts used for nested virt on centos is no longer available
16:09:20 <gthiemonge> this morning some jobs passed, but I'll keep an eye on it
16:09:37 <johnsom> There must be some still around as some jobs are still passing.
16:10:24 <gthiemonge> yeah, maybe not so many hosts
16:11:45 <johnsom> Yeah, and more projects are using that pool now
16:13:46 <gthiemonge> Any other announcements?
16:14:19 <tweining_> only a request for feedback
16:15:10 <tweining_> I proposed a new amphora state for the failover circuit breaker change
16:15:20 <johnsom> Octavia is in the release announce and Greg will be presenting during the OpenInfra Live tomorrow
16:15:22 <johnsom> #link https://www.openstack.org/software/yoga
16:15:45 <tweining_> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/656811 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-lib/+/835049
16:15:55 <gthiemonge> johnsom: I didn't see it
16:15:58 <gthiemonge> cool
16:16:56 <tweining_> if there are any objections about that change please let me know ASAP
16:17:34 <gthiemonge> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:18:09 <gthiemonge> I'm in favor of adding a new status for this feature
16:18:37 <gthiemonge> but we need to be really careful with all the uses of the amphora.status variable
16:19:00 <johnsom> Yeah, state machine changes need to be well thought out
16:19:44 <gthiemonge> but this is also part of our job as reviewers ;-)
16:19:52 <johnsom> Yep
16:22:02 <gthiemonge> for instance
16:22:04 <gthiemonge> in https://opendev.org/openstack/octavia/src/branch/master/octavia/db/repositories.py#L1507
16:22:50 <gthiemonge> what should we do with AMPHORA_FAILOVER_STOPPED amphora?
16:23:47 <gthiemonge> so yeah, we need to review it carefully, but I don't have any concerns with a new status in the amp
16:24:28 <tweining_> I also described in the doc how error recovery could work
16:24:41 <tweining_> or does work right now
16:25:16 <gthiemonge> adding a doc is really great, thanks
16:26:44 <gthiemonge> FYI I proposed backports to switch our centos-8 jobs for centos-8-stream on stable/xena and stable/wallaby
16:26:52 <gthiemonge> (centos-8 nodes were removed)
16:27:20 <gthiemonge> It's not ready yet because I have to backport a fix for c8s in devstack
16:28:06 <gthiemonge> and I would like to get some reviews on 2 patches:
16:28:14 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/740478
16:28:37 <gthiemonge> this is an old patch that improves the validation in the API
16:28:39 <gthiemonge> and
16:28:44 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/829887
16:29:06 <gthiemonge> we were not using the correct dnf repo for haproxy on centos-8-stream
16:31:59 <gthiemonge> #topic Open Discussion
16:32:08 <gthiemonge> any other topics?
16:32:30 <spencerh`> I'm just here in case anyone has any questions about the notifications patch.
16:32:34 <spencerh`> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/831051
16:33:24 <gthiemonge> I haven't looked at it yet :/
16:33:31 <spencerh`> Also, I tried reaching out to the owner of the other notifications patch review via email. Does anyone have contact with them? I'd like to get them involved in the review process if possible so we can settle on a solution.
16:33:40 <spencerh`> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/784628
16:33:46 <spencerh`> No worries!
16:35:00 <gthiemonge> nop sorry, I don't have contact with them, I sent some questions in a comment I didn't get any response
16:35:49 <johnsom> Yeah, the original patch was mnaser, but I don't know if the recent contributor to it is on IRC
16:36:04 <spencerh`> Rather, I reached out to the uploader. Perhaps I'll try the owner as well.
16:36:26 <mnaser> spencerh`: they probably will not be responding
16:36:49 <mnaser> they were working with us but they've moved on and i dont know if i have the bw to look into that patch right now
16:36:49 <spencerh`> Oh hey! That's good to know.
16:37:12 <spencerh`> Ok well thanks for speaking up, that answers all of my questions for now.
16:37:26 <spencerh`> If anyone does get the chance to review, reach out any time! :)
16:37:45 <gthiemonge> spencerh`: ok! thanks!
16:37:48 <johnsom> I think this topic is on the PTG agenda. I plan to re-read through both of these before that topic and raise any comments
16:39:38 <spencerh`> Oh cool. I didn't notice that. Can I attend? I've never joined one before.
16:40:08 <gthiemonge> spencerh`: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-ptg-octavia
16:40:13 <johnsom> absolutely, it is free and virtual
16:40:15 <johnsom> #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/
16:40:39 <johnsom> An the above etherpad link
16:40:55 <spencerh`> Yeah. I see. I just join the diablo meeting room at the scheduled time?
16:41:27 <gthiemonge> I haven't prepared an agenda yet, but if you're available on April 7th, we can discuss the notification patch
16:41:35 <johnsom> Check the etherpad for the meeting link, they usually get generated the week of.
16:42:48 <spencerh`> Ok great! I'll be available for sure. If I have any trouble getting in, I'll look for help in here! :D
16:43:07 <johnsom> +1
16:43:41 <gthiemonge> cool!
16:44:45 <gthiemonge> is that all for today?
16:45:04 <spencerh`> That's it from me. Thanks for the info, everyone!
16:47:02 <gthiemonge> Ok! Thanks everyone!
16:47:04 <gthiemonge> #endmeeting