16:00:35 <gthiemonge> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:35 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Jul 13 16:00:35 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:35 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:35 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:44 <gthiemonge> Hi
16:00:48 <johnsom> o/
16:00:57 <oschwart> o/
16:03:28 <gthiemonge> #topic Announcements
16:03:40 <gthiemonge> ** Zed-2 milestone
16:03:46 <gthiemonge> FYI this week is Zed-2
16:03:55 <gthiemonge> https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
16:04:38 <gthiemonge> we have delivered intermediate releases for python-octaviaclient (3.0.0) and octavia-lib (3.0.0)
16:06:41 <gthiemonge> ** Priority Review list
16:06:51 <gthiemonge> the priority review etherpad is up to date
16:06:55 <gthiemonge> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/octavia-priority-reviews
16:07:02 <gthiemonge> the link is also in the topic ^^
16:07:07 <gthiemonge> we can start reviewing feature patches!
16:08:37 <oschwart> Good to know! Whenever I could run devstack with Octavia I could help more with reviewing those patches
16:09:05 <oschwart> I have just switched to Fedora, so it might be easier for me now
16:10:26 <gthiemonge> oschwart: ack
16:10:50 <johnsom> Fedora might be a bit painful as it changes so often
16:11:34 <johnsom> Sticking to the "supported" runtimes might be easier on you:
16:11:38 <johnsom> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/zed.html
16:12:00 <gthiemonge> hmmm I would not use c9s on my laptop
16:12:39 <oschwart> Oh right - I am planning to run a centos9s vm on my fedora with libvirt
16:12:58 <johnsom> Ok, cool. That will work fine as it's what I do
16:13:09 <oschwart> And moving from snapshot to another like tweining recommended to me lol
16:13:32 <oschwart> Good to know!
16:14:08 <gthiemonge> #topic CI Status
16:14:20 <gthiemonge> I have updated the CI failures etherpad
16:14:26 <gthiemonge> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/octavia-ci-failures
16:14:44 <gthiemonge> we only have 1 ongoing failure, but I haven't seen it recently, so maybe it is closed now
16:14:49 <johnsom> Oh cool, I haven't looked at that in a while
16:14:59 <gthiemonge> (and it was on train and victoria IIRC)
16:15:10 <gthiemonge> FYI I have used the opensearch instance (that collects all the CI logs) to check if it occurred recently
16:16:21 <gthiemonge> I took a look at the periodic jobs, the job that builds a centos 9 stream amphora image is broken
16:16:30 <gthiemonge> this is an SELinux permission issue with DIB
16:16:42 <gthiemonge> I think it should be safe to build the image without SELinux (on the host)
16:16:47 <gthiemonge> so here is a workaround:
16:16:51 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/849291/
16:17:06 <johnsom> +1 I agree, it's important to have it on in the image, but image build time it doesn't really matter
16:17:17 <johnsom> Though it *should* work
16:18:42 <johnsom> Hmm, should that be in DIB itself? Is this going to be a problem for our gate jobs?
16:18:43 <gthiemonge> and FYI the devstack c9s job works because it disables SELinux
16:18:58 <gthiemonge> yeha maybe I should open a ticket on DIB
16:19:18 <gthiemonge> I think their tests use containers, they are probably not affected by this issue
16:20:18 <johnsom> Ah, so devstack turns it off.
16:20:56 <gthiemonge> https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack/src/branch/master/tools/fixup_stuff.sh#L39
16:21:00 <gthiemonge> yes
16:23:07 <gthiemonge> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:23:40 <johnsom> I was on vacation last week, so not a lot to report. Working on reviews
16:24:01 <gthiemonge> I have done reviews this week, especially backports
16:24:23 <gthiemonge> we have got a lot of commits merged since tweining is a core reviewer
16:24:29 <gthiemonge> so more backports to review ;-)
16:25:05 <johnsom> Yeah, don't forget to ping the cores when there is stuff that needs reviewed.
16:26:17 <oschwart> Should I backport this one? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/847977
16:26:44 <gthiemonge> oschwart: yeah sure
16:27:16 <gthiemonge> oschwart: you can backport it down to train
16:27:25 <johnsom> Yeah, I think the versions where the pood_id and the healthmonitor_id were the same are EOL now, so probably won't be an issue
16:27:44 <gthiemonge> you might have conflicts with the v2/ path in train, so apply only the changes in v1
16:28:17 <gthiemonge> oschwart: ping me if you need help
16:28:34 <oschwart> ack, thanks!
16:29:46 <gthiemonge> #topic Open Discussion
16:32:39 <gthiemonge> any topics?
16:32:53 <oschwart> Nothing from me
16:33:35 <johnsom> I don't have anything today
16:33:39 <gthiemonge> ok!
16:33:54 <gthiemonge> then thank you guys!
16:33:59 <gthiemonge> #endmeeting