16:00:27 <gthiemonge> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:27 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Nov 23 16:00:27 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:27 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:27 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:30 <gthiemonge> Hi!
16:00:36 <johnsom> o/
16:00:37 <tweining> o/
16:01:10 <oschwart> o/
16:01:49 <gthiemonge> #topic Announcements
16:01:54 <gthiemonge> ** Migrating devstack jobs to Jammy
16:02:15 <gthiemonge> devstack/tempest are ready for Ubuntu Jammy (one of the official tested runtimes for Antelope)
16:02:44 <gthiemonge> we need to prepare it, octavia-tempest-plugin explicitly uses the focal node-pool
16:02:56 <gthiemonge> I rebased this patch from tweining to verify if everything is fine
16:02:59 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/861369
16:03:41 <tweining> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-November/031260.html
16:03:49 <tweining> (for reference)
16:04:11 <gthiemonge> so far, no error in octavia-v2-dsvm-scenario
16:04:34 <gthiemonge> but we need to fix the nodepools for the stable branches
16:04:46 <gthiemonge> anyways, it is still a WIP patch ATM
16:05:56 <gthiemonge> any questions? any other announcements?
16:06:23 <tweining> the other patch for testing with jammy seems to show no issues
16:06:30 <tweining> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/861366
16:07:25 <gthiemonge> ok great!
16:07:28 <oschwart> Great news folks
16:08:32 <tweining> I will remove the DNM tag from the tempest patch
16:08:40 <gthiemonge> yes
16:09:18 <opendevreview> Tom Weininger proposed openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: Testing Octavia tempest jobs on Ubuntu jammy (22.04)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/861369
16:10:17 <gthiemonge> #topic CI Status
16:10:23 <gthiemonge> Nothing to report here
16:10:44 <gthiemonge> maybe you could take a look at
16:10:48 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/864391
16:11:17 <gthiemonge> it splits the FIPS job into 2 jobs, the FIPS job is too long, it reaches the max timeout in zuul
16:11:37 <gthiemonge> (this is a periodic job)
16:13:14 <oschwart> Is there any openstack documentation regarding those CI jobs?
16:13:21 <oschwart> (where to start from etc)
16:14:33 <tweining> https://docs.openstack.org/infra/openstack-zuul-jobs/
16:14:39 <tweining> that maybe?
16:15:06 <gthiemonge> I have no idea
16:15:38 <oschwart> It looks like a list of many jobs and roles
16:16:02 <oschwart> But anyway, I will take a look at the other related patches we had so far and will try to understand, thanks
16:16:09 <johnsom> #link https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/latest/config/job.html
16:16:28 <johnsom> That is the official docs for defining a Zuul job
16:16:54 <oschwart> Wow that looks like exactly what I was looking for, thanks!
16:18:18 <gthiemonge> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:19:12 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/812260
16:19:18 <gthiemonge> Folks, I have a first patch for an annoying issue, some exceptions are displayed by the amphorav2 driver (without jobboard), these exceptions should be ignored and hidden by Octavia:
16:19:21 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/830015
16:19:22 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/861704
16:19:56 <johnsom> Were rebased, they have sat unreviewed so long they bit rotted.  Would appreciate a review on those
16:20:05 <gthiemonge> johnsom: sure
16:20:34 <oschwart> johnsom: sure
16:21:06 <oschwart> It could be nice if you guys review this one https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/860211 which already has one +2
16:21:16 <gthiemonge> ack
16:21:42 <tweining> in the past week there was great progress on reviewing backports. apart from that there was very little progress I must say.
16:21:57 <gthiemonge> I have also updated 2 patches for recently reported bugs:
16:22:05 <gthiemonge> Fix deletion of listeners and pools with deleted certs
16:22:08 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/859387
16:22:23 <gthiemonge> Add check for duplicate members in batch update
16:22:25 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/864192
16:22:39 <tweining> I've updated the cpu pinning element patch to disable that feature in diskimage-create.sh by default.
16:22:40 <tweining> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/849129
16:22:56 <gthiemonge> QG: BTW thanks for your reviews on those patches!
16:24:01 <johnsom> FYI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/864192 has a zuul -1
16:24:42 <QG> gthiemonge: no problem, i'm testing right now the patchset 2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/859387
16:24:57 <gthiemonge> argh... probably not related, but I might add this failure to our etherpad
16:25:22 <tweining> I almost forgot: the patch that unblocks the ussuri gate still waits for a second +2
16:25:24 <tweining> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/864886
16:26:37 <gthiemonge> last patch from me:
16:26:39 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/864998
16:26:57 <gthiemonge> it fixes a bug on centos 9 stream (and maybe now on Jammy, IDK)
16:28:42 <oschwart> I got them all in my open tabs, I will see how I can help
16:28:48 <tweining> I guess that is enough homework for this week ;)
16:28:56 <gthiemonge> yeah, that's a lot of stuff
16:30:03 <gthiemonge> #topic Open Discussion
16:31:10 <tweining> I have nothing else to discuss I think
16:31:26 <oschwart> Me neither
16:31:36 <johnsom> tweining -1'd the ussuri patch, I think we should pin to the branch (stable/ussuri) and not a specific version tag
16:32:22 <gthiemonge> barbican-tempest-plugin is branchless, right?
16:32:52 <johnsom> Oh, opps, for some reason I read it as barbican, not tempest
16:34:07 <tweining> ok, thanks for approving
16:34:49 <gthiemonge> anything else?
16:35:08 <johnsom> We have a lot of unreviewed tempest patches. Please have a look as you can.
16:35:23 <gthiemonge> ack
16:35:36 <oschwart> ack
16:37:12 <johnsom> FYI, the next two days are a holiday in the US, so I will not be around.
16:37:25 <gthiemonge> johnsom: enjoy!
16:37:45 <tweining> see you next week then. enjoy
16:38:19 <oschwart> Have fun in that break
16:38:21 <gthiemonge> ok, I guess that's it
16:38:25 <gthiemonge> thank you guys
16:38:28 <gthiemonge> #endmeeting