16:00:25 <gthiemonge> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:25 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Mar  1 16:00:25 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:25 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:25 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:26 <tweining> o/
16:00:30 <gthiemonge> Hi
16:00:43 <johnsom> o/
16:01:31 <gthiemonge> #topic Announcements
16:01:38 <gthiemonge> * Antelope Release schedule: RC1
16:01:52 <gthiemonge> we are in the last days before RC1 (should be tomorrow or Friday)
16:02:08 <gthiemonge> we don't plan to release any additional RCs (unless we face a major issue)
16:02:31 <gthiemonge> the priority review list is still there:
16:02:35 <gthiemonge> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/octavia-priority-reviews
16:03:09 <tweining> but we can still merge fixes I guess
16:03:09 <gthiemonge> any questions?
16:03:22 <tweining> after this week
16:03:34 <gthiemonge> nop, only for important regressions
16:03:45 <gthiemonge> RC1 would be the final Release for Antelope
16:03:48 <tweining> understood
16:04:40 <gthiemonge> I think we can merge fixes into the branch but they won't be in the release
16:04:43 <gthiemonge> not sure
16:05:26 <johnsom> The release is tagged based on the last RC
16:05:41 <gthiemonge> yeah
16:06:08 <johnsom> After RC1, if you want a patch in the release, you have to backport it to the stable branch, cut another RC release
16:06:28 <gthiemonge> right
16:06:32 <johnsom> Otherwise, they will just be in stable/antelope for a future release
16:06:45 <tweining> makes sense
16:07:41 <johnsom> If you don't backport, they will be in bobcat
16:08:14 <johnsom> Usually we will call bobcat "open for merge" once we don't think we will have any more stable/antelope backports.
16:08:26 <johnsom> I.e. the final RC is done
16:09:10 <gthiemonge> ack
16:09:31 <gthiemonge> * Octavia PTG
16:09:41 <gthiemonge> I created an etherpad for the next PTG
16:09:46 <gthiemonge> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/bobcat-ptg-octavia
16:10:20 <gthiemonge> the date/time is still TBD
16:10:25 <gthiemonge> but you can add your topics
16:11:31 <gthiemonge> any other announcement?
16:12:13 <tweining> congrats for being the new PTL!
16:12:27 <tweining> (old and new)
16:12:39 <gthiemonge> lol thanks
16:14:09 <gthiemonge> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:14:11 <johnsom> twelve more years!
16:14:17 <gthiemonge> :D
16:14:27 <gthiemonge> I fixed an annoying warning with SQLAlchemy
16:14:35 <gthiemonge> I think it would be nice to have it in Antelpe
16:14:39 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/875367
16:14:49 <gthiemonge> and in stable releases too
16:15:48 <gthiemonge> I also proposed a commit to update the Octavia Policies
16:15:57 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/875620
16:16:08 <gthiemonge> it has 2xCR+2 W+1, so this is fine
16:16:37 <gthiemonge> there's a related octavia-tempest-plugin patch:
16:16:40 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/872648
16:17:16 <gthiemonge> I'm going to recheck it
16:17:38 <gthiemonge> and BTW I updated the sqlalchemy2 patch chain (I aslo proposed a patch for Taskflow)
16:17:42 <gthiemonge> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:sqlalchemy2+project:openstack/octavia
16:17:50 <gthiemonge> (not urgent, but I think we need to merge it at the beginning of the next cycle)
16:19:39 <tweining> lots of V-1 still
16:19:48 <gthiemonge> hmm yeah
16:19:56 <gthiemonge> I need to remove amphorav1 first
16:20:01 <gthiemonge> ;/
16:20:03 <gthiemonge> :/
16:20:22 <gthiemonge> so it's not ready for reviews yet
16:22:20 <gthiemonge> #topic Open Discussion
16:22:21 <tweining> I did only reviews I think, so no update from me
16:22:26 <gthiemonge> ack
16:22:35 <gthiemonge> I have a question about CI jobs
16:23:14 <gthiemonge> I proposed a change for spliting the centos 9 stream scenario job into 2 jobs (because it often times out)
16:23:23 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/874054
16:23:48 <gthiemonge> this testing buildset shows that it reduces the duration of the jobs:
16:23:50 <gthiemonge> https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/buildset/424999dc143b4bedaee4d8b870561b32
16:24:06 <gthiemonge> my question: do you think we should do the same thing for non-c9s jobs?
16:26:30 <tweining> not sure. I see a few non-voting jobs take more than 2h as well
16:27:02 <tweining> before I started working on Openstack I considered every job taking more than 20 mins. slow :)
16:28:34 <gthiemonge> maybe this can be a topic for the PTG
16:32:38 <gthiemonge> ok, anything else for today's meeting?
16:35:37 <gthiemonge> ok!
16:35:41 <gthiemonge> thank you Folks!
16:35:44 <gthiemonge> #endmeeting