16:00:18 <gthiemon1e> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:18 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Jan 17 16:00:18 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gthiemon1e. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:18 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:18 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:23 <gthiemon1e> o/
16:00:27 <tweining> o/
16:00:36 <johnsom> o/
16:01:43 <oschwart> o/
16:02:01 <gthiemon1e> #topic Announcements
16:03:24 <gthiemon1e> * OpenStack Dalmatian (2024.01)
16:03:44 <gthiemon1e> if you missed it, the OpenStack D release will be named "Dalmatian"
16:04:11 <tweining> makes sense, follows that animal naming scheme of previous releases
16:05:33 <gthiemon1e> and I don't have any other exciting announcements
16:07:47 <johnsom> I have no internet today due to storms, so I will have very limited connectivity
16:08:29 <gthiemon1e> johnsom: sorry about that
16:08:36 <gthiemon1e> #topic CI Status
16:08:44 <gthiemon1e> FYI the pep8 job is broken on stable branches
16:09:13 <gthiemon1e> tkajinam has proposed fixes (he already fixed it on master in December - thanks BTW!)
16:09:24 <gthiemon1e> https://review.opendev.org/q/I5a5d746657da3501fb332361fee6ea25186285f3
16:11:41 <oschwart> nice
16:12:39 <gthiemon1e> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review
16:13:06 <gthiemon1e> there's a new bug: [neutron]/endpoint_type is not respected
16:13:14 <gthiemon1e> https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/2049551
16:14:21 <gthiemon1e> there are a few proposals to fix it
16:14:26 <gthiemon1e> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/905794
16:14:54 <gthiemon1e> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2049551%22
16:15:58 <tkajinam> the 2nd one with bug/2049551 is for a different topic which I've found when looking into that bug. let me remove that tag to avoid confusion
16:16:09 <tkajinam> I'm talking about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/905806
16:16:22 <gthiemon1e> there's also another new bug: User without barbican "creator" role gets "Forbidden" when creating an LB
16:16:25 <gthiemon1e> tkajinam: thank you
16:17:02 <gthiemon1e> there's an error message in horizon when the user doesn't have the permission to access to barbican
16:17:11 <gthiemon1e> but they still can create LBs
16:17:39 <gthiemon1e> not urgent, but kind of ugly
16:19:43 <johnsom> Yep
16:20:07 <gthiemon1e> for this endpoint_type thing, I thought that this code would have handled the deprecation correctly:
16:20:11 <gthiemon1e> https://opendev.org/openstack/octavia/src/branch/master/octavia/common/config.py#L948-L952
16:21:06 <gthiemon1e> i'll take a look at that
16:21:10 <tweining> I remember that mess that the removal of python-neutronclient caused
16:24:30 <tweining> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22pyupgrade%22+owner:tweining@redhat.com I have split up the pyupgrade patches as discussed last week.
16:25:17 <tweining> one of the patches needs some more love, but the others are waiting for review :)
16:25:52 <gthiemon1e> tweining: thanks
16:26:20 <johnsom> I am making some progress on the nftables implementation for SR-IOV VIPs, but it is a lot of work
16:28:57 <gthiemon1e> #topic Open Discussion
16:30:30 <oschwart> I hope I could get back to contribute and review patches on Octavia u/s soon, right now we are a little packed
16:31:40 <tkajinam> one topic related to the pep8 job problem discussed earlier. I've also proposed a patch to cap hacking in master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/905660 . This would allow us to avoid similar problems in the future. it'd be nice if it can be reviewed along with stable branch fixes
16:31:54 <gthiemon1e> tkajinam: sure
16:33:14 <tweining> only FYI, I tried to rebase patchset 16 of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/893066 in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/905683, but I didn't get it to work still
16:37:42 <tweining> nothing else from me
16:38:39 <gthiemon1e> test_http_udp_terminated_https_listener_create_on_same_port doesn't work because _test_listener_create_on_same_port doesn't handle TERMINATED_HTTPS protocol
16:39:41 <gthiemon1e> anything else folks?
16:40:37 <oschwart> nothing from me
16:40:44 <gthiemon1e> ok!
16:40:46 <johnsom> Nothing for me either
16:40:51 <gthiemon1e> thank you guys!
16:40:54 <gthiemon1e> #endmeeting