16:00:09 <johnsom> #startmeeting Octavia
16:00:09 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Dec  3 16:00:09 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:09 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:09 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'octavia'
16:00:21 <johnsom> Hello everyone
16:01:48 <gthiemonge> o/
16:01:49 <johnsom> #topic Announcements
16:02:04 <raineszm> o/
16:02:45 <johnsom> I do not have any announcements this week.
16:02:48 <johnsom> We are well into milestone 1 for Gazpacho.
16:03:05 <johnsom> The next milestone is the week of January 5th
16:03:14 <johnsom> Any other announcements?
16:03:21 <gthiemonge> nop
16:03:38 <johnsom> #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review \
16:04:11 <johnsom> I don't have much to report this week as we had a holiday here in the US. I am mostly working on reviews.
16:04:36 <gthiemonge> pylint was fixed few weeks ago, we can update the requirements to unblock it
16:04:41 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/967163
16:05:00 <johnsom> I did triage a bug about changing member port numbers, which turned out to be a known issue in the haproxy engine when using a state file.
16:05:10 <johnsom> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/2132955
16:05:20 <gthiemonge> this week I also found out that the amphora delete endpoint was not working with amphorav2 (broken since amphorav2 was introduced)
16:05:24 <gthiemonge> I proposed a fix:
16:05:33 <gthiemonge> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/969195
16:05:43 <johnsom> Oh, good news on the pylint fix. That was slow to get fixed given how bad the regression was....
16:06:01 <gthiemonge> yeah they had 3 broken releases
16:06:52 <raineszm> Minor backport review request: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/967755 I'm on a quest back to yoga
16:07:57 <gthiemonge> raineszm: hey, just a comment on your backports, we usually backport from n branch to n-1 branch, and it seems that you created the backports from master
16:07:59 <johnsom> Yoga, wow, that is an old release...
16:08:32 <johnsom> Correct, they should be chained release to release
16:08:41 <raineszm> Oh. Oof. Sorry about that
16:09:28 <raineszm> should I abandon and then redo the cherrypicks as things are merged?
16:09:29 <gthiemonge> it helps a lot when you have merge conflicts during the backport process
16:09:48 <gthiemonge> IMHO you can keep them, it's not a huge patch
16:09:50 <raineszm> Or just update the cherry pick locally
16:09:52 <raineszm> Oh okay
16:10:07 <raineszm> If there's any issues I'm happy to redo the cherrypicks as needed
16:10:23 <gthiemonge> and backporting to unmaintained/* branch will probably fail because of the CI, I'm not sure it's fully funcitonal there
16:10:51 <raineszm> johnsom: yoga is still very popular
16:10:56 <gthiemonge> let's see how it goes
16:11:17 <johnsom> Yeah, the unmaintained branches will likely not merge. We have other patches stuck there as the core team cannot merge them.
16:11:49 <raineszm> Is there a separate channel for unmaintained-core?
16:12:25 <johnsom> Not that I am aware of. It's a bit of an issue in this new "unmaintained" process.
16:13:09 <johnsom> There should be a list of the "unmaintained" reviews somewhere in gerrit. I would have to search around to find it
16:14:27 <johnsom> I will try to find out who can merge those and message you here later today.
16:15:47 <raineszm> johnsom: ack and thx
16:16:19 <raineszm> I'm also happy to get involved in the unmaintained process. I'll probably be passing through there many times, so I can pay it forward
16:17:56 <johnsom> That might be helpful. I think it is really a lack of people to do reviews on patches backported that far back.
16:18:37 <raineszm> Sure. Finding people to do reviews is a perennial problem to begin with.
16:18:47 <gthiemonge> the issue is that we have to maintain the CI for these unmaintained branches
16:20:24 <johnsom> raineszm See this link as a starting point:
16:20:26 <johnsom> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20231114-amend-unmaintained-status.html
16:21:57 <johnsom> I would inquire in #openstack-stable about becoming a member of that group
16:24:09 <johnsom> Ok, we have dipped into open discussion, so moving on
16:24:10 <johnsom> #topic Open Discussion
16:24:18 <johnsom> Any other topics this week?
16:24:29 <gthiemonge> nothing from me
16:25:02 <johnsom> We did have a request for reviews on the TCP heartbeats this week:
16:25:07 <johnsom> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/852269
16:25:14 <johnsom> So if you can, please help review it
16:25:19 <gthiemonge> ack
16:26:32 <johnsom> I don't have any open discussion items this week either
16:27:52 <johnsom> Ok, thank you all for joining!
16:27:57 <gthiemonge> johnsom: thanks!
16:28:02 <johnsom> #endmeeting