22:09:07 #startmeeting 22:09:08 Meeting started Tue Sep 27 22:09:07 2011 UTC. The chair is danwent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 22:09:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 22:09:11 Dan: Thanks for the heads up 22:09:12 o/ 22:09:14 o/ 22:09:17 hey all. 22:09:25 hello! 22:09:26 edgar: np 22:09:31 howdy 22:09:40 btw, salv is stuck at SFO trying to get his car rental 22:09:46 o/ 22:10:08 he sends his regrets 22:10:26 should be a pretty short meeting though 22:10:31 ok 22:10:47 agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/Meetings 22:10:51 #topic general status 22:11:04 design summit is next week, hope to see you all in boston 22:11:23 today is the last day to get proposals in, but space for netstack items is already overflowing. 22:11:54 I highly suggest we make use of the unconference for overflow 22:11:59 we've had to drastically cut down on the time for our sessions. hopefully we can make a lot of use of the unconference space though, as I want to make sure everyone gets a chance to discuss what they want to cover 22:12:04 :) 22:12:23 does anyone have a session that they think is really important, but haven't proposed? 22:12:44 its now or never…. (or rather, not until the next summit) 22:13:18 Ok, so the plan is to start the summit focusing on more tactical items that are fairly well understood (e.g., API v1.1) 22:13:43 Then we'll branch into general discussions about how to insert more advanced network services. 22:14:05 finally, we'll have sessions to talk about a few of those specific services that people are most interested in. 22:14:09 does that sound reasonable? 22:14:17 yes 22:14:39 hopefully we can leave some space at the end so people can find unconference space to branch out from there 22:14:55 Ok, great. Any other questions/concerns about the summit/conference? 22:15:05 schedules still aren't set. 22:15:19 ttx said that summit schedule may not be finalized until close to monday. 22:15:24 dan: the session about networking services is the one that you have submitted? 22:15:43 edgar: I think we'll merge your session and mine into a 55-minute session. 22:15:55 does that sound reasonable? 22:16:01 dan: Absolutely! 22:16:06 I think this will be a key topic of interest, so I definitely want to make sure it gets time. 22:16:17 great 22:16:36 Ok, that's it for the summit. let's move on to the regular agenda 22:16:41 #topic donabe status 22:16:54 (shaking it up, putting donabe in front of melange :P) 22:16:59 ha 22:17:18 I sent out an email about tomorrows meeting 22:17:33 we are going to try webex but fall back to irc, if there is a problem 22:17:47 dendrobates: I may need to channel salvatore and request that we alternate between webex and go-to-meeting 22:17:48 I will be sending out an agenda before the meeting 22:18:05 danwent: that is fine as long as we can record the session 22:18:09 :P 22:18:17 actually, i prefer webex 22:18:28 It may be a total failure, but it is worth a try 22:18:42 I think its great to try to get people on the same page pre-summit 22:19:04 That's really the only update I have. 22:19:11 ok, any questions for donabe? 22:19:29 #topic melange status 22:19:34 troy? 22:19:43 have moved the merge prop over to git/gerrit 22:19:52 working through comments 22:20:17 also closing gaps between the nova/quantum/melange flow 22:20:37 finally, should finish up some of the nova refactoring to make the integration cleaner 22:20:38 troytoman: yeah, i definitely things there still room for that as well. I would add dashboard to the mix too. 22:20:48 that's about it 22:21:17 one of the sessions we'll have on monday is going to focus on that flow from the user perspective. should be very helpful. 22:21:21 troytoman: TV and I would love to chat with you next week re: discovery 22:21:34 may have host a unconference discussion about how to enable multi-nic/quantum in nova api 22:21:49 carlp: sure thing 22:22:07 troy: I think we can cover that to some degree in the flow session, then perhaps have an unconference to do more detailed design. 22:22:09 so that you can select networks and add vifs at create time 22:22:12 agree that it is really important 22:22:18 danwent: perfect 22:22:25 ok, any other questions for melange? 22:22:30 danwent: sounds like the right place 22:22:57 #topic quantum status 22:23:00 ok. see everyone next week! 22:23:05 troy: thx 22:23:15 quantum release went out. 22:23:24 Big thanks to Salvatore for the v1.0 API doc. 22:23:37 Thanks for all for reviews on the Quantum Admin Guide. 22:23:54 thanks to dan for the admin guide and last minute merges :) 22:23:58 it would be great to have input on how to setup quantum + dashboard, so we are ready to go once keystone releases. 22:24:05 danwent: thanks for all your leadership on that. awesome work everyone! 22:24:22 markvoelker here? 22:24:23 dan: +1 last time I tried ran into some issues 22:24:32 or arvind? 22:24:42 o/ 22:25:00 ttx: sorry - missed you. If you're still around, my understanding is that Keystone is now Diablo compatible. Is there anything missing? 22:25:15 hey mark, are you folks planning on doing a session at the summit about dashboard + quantum? 22:25:20 devcamcar: is this bug a show-stopper for you or does it just result in admins seeing all tenants? 22:25:23 or should be just roll that into the flow discussion? 22:25:46 zns: sorry, main openstack meeting is over and people have likely left. This is the NetStack meeting. 22:26:10 I don't currently have one planned, but there has been some chatter about what we'd like to see. May be a good topic for unconference 22:26:11 danwent: ok - sorry to butt in. 22:26:32 zns: np 22:26:47 unconference or I did see salvatore propose a session, so roll dashboard discussions into that.. 22:27:07 Either way works for me. =) 22:27:14 markvoelker: ok, great. I'm sure this will come up in the discussion on flow, which Salv proposed. If there are details beyond that, we can do an unconference. 22:27:30 I'll try to make sure day 3 has sufficient time for unconference sessions resulting from earlier sessions. 22:27:47 Ok, any other comments on the release or docs? 22:28:04 I think we probably already covered the summit + conference at the begining of the meeting. 22:28:31 we got a lot of good press for quantum, as Quantum was mentioned in the main OpenStack release announcement. very cool. 22:28:56 bhall, anything you need to discuss about the shift to github, gerrit? 22:29:03 is everyone getting review emails now? 22:29:34 danwent: I talked to jeblair about this this morning 22:29:57 the way it works now is that anyone that wants emails about new reviews/etc needs to go add themselves as watchers in gerrit to the quantum project 22:30:09 got a link? 22:30:15 I can send out an email about how to do this 22:30:40 ok great. thanks. 22:31:02 in that email, could you also include the pointer on how to transfer a diff from launchpad over the github? 22:31:03 but, until I do that, just go here: https://review.openstack.org/#settings,projects 22:31:07 and add quantum 22:31:08 sure 22:31:16 Ok, great. Any other questions on quantum? 22:31:36 #topic open discussion 22:32:07 ok, that was short and sweet. 22:32:34 everyone please do send out what you have as far as blueprints ahead of the summit meeting itself 22:33:10 hopefully we'll have an finalized netstack agenda by tomorrow. We may have to wait longer to know the exact time of sessions though. 22:33:15 see you all in boston :) 22:33:30 #endmeeting