22:02:05 #startmeeting 22:02:06 Meeting started Tue Mar 13 22:02:05 2012 UTC. The chair is danwent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 22:02:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 22:02:21 We tried to change it away from Keystone as the default topic, but kept on getting permission denied errors. 22:02:26 #info agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/Meetings 22:02:44 Ok, our target for Essex RC1 is tomorrow 22:02:53 https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/essex-rc1 22:02:55 hi 22:03:13 overall, we're in pretty good shape code-wise 22:03:27 we just need a final push of reviews. 22:04:09 and there are a few tricky issues we'll talk about later in the meeting 22:04:20 whoops… my wireless dropped for a second :) 22:04:35 but first, are there any issues not yet targeted for RC1? 22:04:45 I found one this morning by sifting through the reviews 22:05:24 Ok, the agenda has links to three reviews that should be pretty straight-forward 22:05:49 I wanted to bring up the two reviews targeted for RC1 that are not necessarily straightforward 22:05:51 https://review.openstack.org/#change,5293 22:06:19 is rkukura around? 22:06:37 this is probably the biggest outstanding change. adds rootwrap to all client agents. 22:06:50 its only slightly crooked 22:07:18 hi there! 22:08:06 ok, i haven't had a chance to review the rootwrap stuff yet, but assuming it doesn't require mucking with dependencies, I think its good to go in RC1 22:08:16 the patch adds root_helper to the agents, and rootwrap is only involved if the deployer configures it. 22:08:45 great 22:08:51 Ok, and the other interesting patch is: https://review.openstack.org/#change,5220 22:09:34 this patch was merged as is into nova, and a few other projects (ultimately, it belongs in openstack-common) 22:10:00 willian noticed that it used some deprecated capabilities, but other projects apparently decided to fix that issue in folsom 22:10:04 is willian here? 22:10:40 the deprecation may not be an issue 22:11:05 mnewby: ok. i don't have a lot of context here, so my default would be to follow the decision made by nova and others 22:11:14 i'm not sure what version of sqlalchemy will be the default across openstack. there was a discussion about whether it would be 0.6 or 0..7 22:11:37 mnewby: does it currently vary? 22:11:38 (for essex i mean) 22:11:54 in terms of what is specified in pip-requires? 22:12:02 I'll check 22:12:22 ok, so let's just handle the rest of the discussion on the review itself, but I wanted to raise a flag on that one. 22:12:52 Ok, so as we get to an RC, ideally we can test quantum and the various plugins using actual distros, not just our dev setups 22:13:07 this is obviously important for catching any packaging related issues. 22:13:24 the fedora team put together a really cool page to help with this on fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_run_Nova_with_Quantum 22:13:57 That's excelent! 22:14:11 i've pinged folks from canonical about the quantum packaging on ubuntu. I played around with it over the weekend on precise, and didn't have a lot of luck. Though it could have been that I misconfigured something 22:14:12 very nice! 22:14:39 If I hear anything back, I will make sure it gets to the list. If anyone else has success on precise, please let us know. 22:14:53 are there any other distros we should be targeting for testing? 22:15:59 on a different note, I think we're very close to having a final version of debo's excercise script that will get merged into devstack 22:16:01 https://review.openstack.org/#change,4665 22:16:08 reviews there are greatly appreciated. 22:16:17 (davlaps, that was quick!) 22:16:21 :) 22:16:53 debo-os, did you say you are already running this regularly on your own setup? 22:17:14 not regularly .... occasionally 22:17:30 ok. well hopefully we can work with the openstack-ci team to run it regularly once it is merged 22:17:37 but I have a machine where I can run it as a cron job 22:17:58 #info reminder about the community project page: http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumStarterBugs 22:19:01 #info and the thread on the ML about what the Quantum team should focus on in Folsom. Goal is to get a good mix of whiz-bang new capabilities and good ole fashioned platform improvements. 22:19:50 summit sign-up website is up, but I want to make sure we get good community input on the ML, so we have a cohesive quantum track. 22:20:14 If you haven't replied to the ML thread, please do so in the next few days. 22:20:30 ok, any open discussion? 22:20:33 is that whlooking forward to that 22:20:49 ? 22:20:49 sorry, very laggy today 22:20:52 :) 22:21:08 I'm looking forward to usnning debo-os's code in CI :) 22:21:18 yeah, will be a HUGE win 22:21:44 carlp: please let me know how I can help ... also its not just my code, DavidL is a co-contributor .... 22:21:59 Ok, sounds like that's everyone. Please remember to pick off a few reviews today if you haven't already. RC1 will drop tomorrow unless we get any nasty new bugs! 22:22:12 #endmeeting