18:02:50 #startmeeting 18:02:51 Meeting started Tue Apr 10 18:02:50 2012 UTC. The chair is heckj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:02:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:03:02 Ola all! 18:03:11 working from Agenda here: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting 18:03:38 #topic Status for Summit 18:04:10 I'm not 100% on ttx' plan for scheduling the summit sessions, btu that should be getting nailed down shortly 18:04:50 I've gone through and approved all the sessions, so we're pretty full up on times 18:04:59 (i.e. completely booked for the time alloted) 18:05:24 I'm going to run through and pre-create etherpads for the sessions as well. They match up with the blueprints currently listed 18:05:44 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone 18:06:06 Any questions related to prep for the summit? 18:07:24 Okay - moving on 18:07:45 #topic Hi Pri issues? 18:08:04 I triaged 2 new bugs - one needs more information, the other is a "we'd like" future work piece 18:08:19 Anyone aware of other high priority issues or other trouble on the release? 18:09:36 ok... 18:09:40 quiet morning. That's good 18:09:45 last topic 18:09:48 #topic Open Questions 18:09:55 Whassup? 18:10:08 about https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/972800 18:10:09 Launchpad bug 972800 in keystone "Identity backends provide get_by_name methods but they aren't available via API" [Wishlist,Confirmed] 18:10:30 I'm waiting some help about this to start developping something 18:10:49 I've added a link to an extension I'm using meantime 18:12:03 * heckj looks 18:13:09 rafaduran: you'll get more discussion rolling about your code if you do it as a git review against the current codebase. 18:14:17 we'll also be talking about revising the API sets into something new (a next revision) at the summit - this would be a perfect component of that discussion 18:14:37 heckj: I've done this extension because I needed inmediatly but now I wish add to keystone, but I don't really know if this fit at keystone core or contrib or whatever 18:15:11 rafaduran: propose it as contrib for starters, and let's get feedback rolling on the folks looking at the code. 18:15:23 heckj: ok, thanks 18:15:48 anything/noeone else 18:15:56 bcwaldon: everything cookin' along? 18:16:09 heckj: yep, just here to watch ;) 18:16:31 I've also sent a patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/956954 18:16:32 Launchpad bug 956954 in keystone "Keystone needs a URL normalizer middleware" [Low,In progress] 18:16:52 for folsom but I think a bit early 18:17:00 so it wasn't reviewed 18:17:18 cool - I'll take a look at it today and get some feedback rolling 18:17:18 Do I re-send it o just discard it? 18:18:02 rafarduran: you might remove your -1, people won't generally thinl/know to review if you're asserting "don't touch this" (which is what the -1 basically does) 18:18:27 If you re-review that patch, it'll reactivate 18:18:40 ok, I just wanted to mark it for folsom 18:19:06 cool 18:21:38 heckj: I think the patch can't be reviewed since it is marked abandoned 18:21:38 If nothing else, I'll wrap this up for today... 18:22:02 rafaduran: check out that patch, and invoke "git review" on it again and it'll reactivate 18:22:29 heckj: ok 18:23:51 rafaduran: you good? 18:29:58 guessin' so 18:30:00 closing this out 18:30:03 #endmeeting