#openstack-meeting-4: OpenStack Ansible Meeting
Meeting started by b3rnard0 at 16:00:52 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting
(b3rnard0,
16:01:08)
- RollCall (b3rnard0, 16:01:19)
- Review action items from last week (b3rnard0, 16:03:56)
- ACTION: hughsaunders
to start reading inventory-manage.py (b3rnard0,
16:08:42)
- hughsaunders: We were talking about extracting
some bits to make it a more general library, with potentially more
back ends (b3rnard0,
16:09:53)
- bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/dynamic-inventory-lib
(b3rnard0,
16:10:09)
- ACTION: b3rnard0 use
link shortener at next meeting (b3rnard0,
16:11:48)
- Vote on the genericized patch and merge process for review "https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152753/" <- this is in response to the community request that the repository be de-rackspace-ified and fulfills the blueprints (b3rnard0, 16:12:58)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152753/
(b3rnard0,
16:13:06)
- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/galaxy-roles
(b3rnard0,
16:13:15)
- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/rackspace-namesake
(b3rnard0,
16:13:23)
- from cloudnull: removing maas, and some of the
rackspace scripts is no problem (b3rnard0,
16:23:33)
- http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_best_practices.html#directory-layout
for reference (Apsu,
16:25:07)
- http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_best_practices.html#directory-layout
(b3rnard0,
16:25:40)
- http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_best_practices.html
(b3rnard0,
16:27:06)
- from odyssey4me we'll have to develop patches
for juno independantly from master (b3rnard0,
16:31:43)
- cloudnull: so what i want is for people to
review it, comment on it, and before it is excepted i'd like to have
+6, cores and other. (b3rnard0,
16:38:23)
- ACTION: d34dh0r53 :
to help with review of
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152753/ (b3rnard0,
16:38:55)
- Upstream gating and how do we make it better - (cloudnull) - patch in review for some improvements: (b3rnard0, 16:39:11)
- https://review.openstack.org/152965
(b3rnard0,
16:39:19)
- from hughsaunders: performance testing on pub
cloud isn't great; but I would like to see that as a job run from
the same jenkins master (b3rnard0,
16:49:27)
- Open discussion (b3rnard0, 16:52:19)
Meeting ended at 16:56:21 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- hughsaunders to start reading inventory-manage.py
- b3rnard0 use link shortener at next meeting
- d34dh0r53 : to help with review of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152753/
Action items, by person
- b3rnard0
- b3rnard0 use link shortener at next meeting
- d34dh0r53
- d34dh0r53 : to help with review of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152753/
- hughsaunders
- hughsaunders to start reading inventory-manage.py
- openstack
- d34dh0r53 : to help with review of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152753/
People present (lines said)
- cloudnull (78)
- odyssey4me (47)
- b3rnard0 (28)
- palendae (23)
- hughsaunders (20)
- Apsu (13)
- git-harry (5)
- alextricity (5)
- d34dh0r53 (5)
- openstack (3)
- toxick (2)
- stevelle (1)
- sigmavirus24 (1)
- rackertom (1)
- mancdaz (1)
- serverascode (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.