#openstack-meeting-4: OpenStack Ansible Meeting
Meeting started by b3rnard0 at 16:00:30 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Agenda & rollcall (b3rnard0, 16:00:41)
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting
(b3rnard0,
16:00:53)
- Review action items from last week (b3rnard0, 16:03:37)
- cloudnull continue pinging jhesketh about
creating a separate repo and other things <- yes should be in
review today (b3rnard0,
16:04:22)
- ACTION: odyssey4me
Solicit feedback from the mailing list as to whether os package
management should be part of the project? (b3rnard0,
16:07:04)
- odyssey4me I'm working on putting together a
PoC using one of the roles to test the concept for review. related
to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/tunable-openstack-configuration
(b3rnard0,
16:12:24)
- odyssey4me: whether that becomes part of the
project goes back to the manifesto (b3rnard0,
16:22:18)
- odyssey4me: we have some success:
https://review.openstack.org/163544 (b3rnard0,
16:23:50)
- Blueprints (cloudnull, 16:26:26)
- cloudnull: I've created a rough draft and I
need to add some other bits post a few discussions i've had with
some folks and I will have it on an etherpad and on the ML later
today. (b3rnard0,
16:27:07)
- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/improved-network-generation
(b3rnard0,
16:28:29)
- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/tunable-openstack-configuration
(b3rnard0,
16:35:59)
- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/dynamically-manage-policy.json
(b3rnard0,
16:38:10)
- odyssey4me: sounds good - if the module can get
built, then it'd be a far better way of handling tunable
configurations (b3rnard0,
16:44:05)
- Open discussion (b3rnard0, 16:49:14)
Meeting ended at 17:00:31 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- odyssey4me Solicit feedback from the mailing list as to whether os package management should be part of the project?
Action items, by person
- odyssey4me
- odyssey4me Solicit feedback from the mailing list as to whether os package management should be part of the project?
People present (lines said)
- cloudnull (73)
- Apsu (36)
- odyssey4me (34)
- palendae (31)
- b3rnard0 (30)
- sdake (19)
- BjoernT (15)
- stevelle (6)
- openstack (6)
- git-harry (5)
- alextricity (5)
- daneyon_ (3)
- bgmccollum (2)
- mattt (2)
- rackertom (2)
- mancdaz (2)
- andymccr (1)
- sigmavirus24 (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.