===============================================
#openstack-meeting-4: OpenStack Ansible Meeting
===============================================


Meeting started by b3rnard0 at 16:00:30 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2015/openstack_ansible_meeting.2015-03-12-16.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Agenda & rollcall  (b3rnard0, 16:00:41)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting
    (b3rnard0, 16:00:53)

* Review action items from last week  (b3rnard0, 16:03:37)
  * cloudnull continue pinging jhesketh about creating a separate repo
    and other things <- yes should be in review today  (b3rnard0,
    16:04:22)
  * ACTION: odyssey4me Solicit feedback from the mailing list as to
    whether os package management should be part of the project?
    (b3rnard0, 16:07:04)
  * odyssey4me I'm working on putting together a PoC using one of the
    roles to test the concept for review. related to
    https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/tunable-openstack-configuration
    (b3rnard0, 16:12:24)
  * odyssey4me: whether that becomes part of the project goes back to
    the manifesto  (b3rnard0, 16:22:18)
  * odyssey4me: we have some success:
    https://review.openstack.org/163544  (b3rnard0, 16:23:50)

* Blueprints  (cloudnull, 16:26:26)
  * cloudnull: I've created a rough draft and I need to add some other
    bits post a few discussions i've had with some folks and I will have
    it on an etherpad and on the ML later today.  (b3rnard0, 16:27:07)
  * LINK:
    https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/improved-network-generation
    (b3rnard0, 16:28:29)
  * LINK:
    https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/tunable-openstack-configuration
    (b3rnard0, 16:35:59)
  * LINK:
    https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/dynamically-manage-policy.json
    (b3rnard0, 16:38:10)
  * odyssey4me: sounds good - if the module can get built, then it'd be
    a far better way of handling tunable configurations  (b3rnard0,
    16:44:05)

* Open discussion  (b3rnard0, 16:49:14)



Meeting ended at 17:00:31 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* odyssey4me
  * odyssey4me Solicit feedback from the mailing list as to whether os
    package management should be part of the project?



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* cloudnull (73)
* Apsu (36)
* odyssey4me (34)
* palendae (31)
* b3rnard0 (30)
* sdake (19)
* BjoernT (15)
* stevelle (6)
* openstack (6)
* git-harry (5)
* alextricity (5)
* daneyon_ (3)
* bgmccollum (2)
* mattt (2)
* rackertom (2)
* mancdaz (2)
* andymccr (1)
* sigmavirus24 (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4