16:01:13 #startmeeting OpenStack Ansible Meeting 16:01:15 Meeting started Thu Sep 17 16:01:13 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cloudnull. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:18 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:01:52 o/ 16:02:00 \o 16:02:02 #topic Agenda & rollcall 16:02:07 yo 16:02:39 #chair odyssey4me 16:02:39 Current chairs: cloudnull odyssey4me 16:02:39 o/ 16:03:06 o/ 16:03:35 so lets jump right in 16:03:39 #topic Review action items from last week 16:03:46 Sam-I-Am to create an etherpad for the config changes he finds for future OSAD implementation 16:03:55 i did this 16:03:58 well, doing 16:04:26 link ? 16:04:49 we had a link already 16:04:54 yeah, we did 16:05:00 we did ;) 16:05:00 i have it here somewhere buried in tabs 16:05:06 i found it 16:05:08 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-config-changes 16:05:09 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-config-changes 16:05:32 so its still a work in progress, but gives us something to start reviewing. 16:05:52 its getting updated as i hit services 16:06:06 right now i'm in the middle of rearchitecting the upstream install guide, so there's a pause on the neutron stuff 16:06:24 looks like middleware changed again, so i get to dig through the gates for those updates 16:06:47 sweet. great work on those bits. we'll keep watchfull on the etherpad. 16:06:51 next 16:06:53 odyssey4me to switch the blueprint for juno->liberty upgrades to 12.1.0 16:07:15 yup, done 16:07:33 uh, we are doing juno -> liberty without going through kilo? 16:07:48 wasn't it kilo -> liberty in the previous meeting? 16:07:59 deja vu 16:08:14 yeah, I put the wrong thing in :p 16:08:19 the action points weren't updated ;) 16:08:59 palendae: Sam-I-Am: we also have https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207713/ which is liberty upgrade related, 16:09:20 git-harry: had a lot of good feedback there. itd be good to get that updated / replied to when possible. 16:10:07 palendae ^ 16:10:26 oh, silly me didn't see that he was already notified :p 16:10:36 Yep, I'm gona look over it 16:10:50 Oh wait 16:10:53 That's mine 16:11:12 it is. 16:11:19 so moving on 16:11:25 #topic Liberty Release Blueprints (note dependencies) 16:11:33 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/liberty-release 16:12:14 in that segment the bigest one pending is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/tunable-openstack-configuration 16:12:33 which has the following items that need to be reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-ansible+branch:master+topic:bp/tunable-openstack-configuration,n,z 16:12:49 such a cool spec. If it was one facebook I'd almost like it. 16:13:04 ha 16:13:07 (the first one) 16:13:08 lol 16:13:12 you can +1 :p 16:13:26 I'm going through review of those but taking my time 16:13:37 twitter is the new facebook 16:13:44 I don't have them 16:13:46 :p 16:14:19 sorry for the off-topic. 16:14:30 not at all. 16:14:32 :) 16:14:42 next in that which needs some review https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/named-veths 16:15:06 oh nevermind i guess the docs merged. 16:15:17 cloudnull there's an issue with https://review.openstack.org/178259 which needs fixing too 16:15:38 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/upgrade-mariadb-v10 16:15:56 yea that was next. i need to get back to reviewing / updating that 16:16:07 unless someone else wants to step in 16:16:44 #action cloudnull - continue working on https://review.openstack.org/178259 for MariaDB 10 16:17:09 and this needs to go to 16:17:11 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+spec/limit-mysql-config-distribution 16:18:05 yeah, if that slips then I think it's ok 16:18:28 next on my pile is mariadb but i hope to tackle that soon. 16:19:03 the rest of the major specs look ok 16:19:23 unless i missed one ? 16:19:27 or something else ? 16:19:50 nope - just need more reviews 16:19:55 not sure if we are there yet, but ipv6 spec? 16:19:56 ++ please :) 16:20:09 not a req for liberty though 16:20:17 actaully mitaka 16:20:17 prometheanfire: wasn't that supposed to be also worked in the summit? 16:20:21 ipv6 spec is less urgent as it's for the mitaka cycle 16:20:27 ^ that 16:20:31 what evrardjp said 16:20:32 ya, forgot about that 16:20:43 #topic Mitaka Summit Discussion Agenda (input required) 16:21:03 odyssey4me: has been working on this a bit , tyvm btw 16:21:38 if you have things youd like to add into the sessions, please do so 16:22:07 or proposed sessions 16:22:16 anything and everything is welcome . 16:22:24 we'll have to select sessions based on our final allocation of space 16:22:42 but please note the moderator, etc - don't just add a topic 16:22:59 also note that each session will require some preparation 16:23:05 these sessions are about us as a community building all of this better so everything is welcome 16:24:04 next 16:24:08 #topic Docs 16:24:16 -- Items in progress or otherwise in need of work -- 16:24:25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=rpcdocs&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_ 16:24:26 commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on 16:24:30 thanks for the work done by the doc team first 16:24:30 ah... 16:24:57 mmm, docs 16:25:05 ++ evrardjp said, docs team is awesome ! 16:25:35 sorry if we sometimes put DocImpact without doing the doc that comes with it when we are in a hurry 16:25:38 so the links are too damn big to paste in 16:25:45 url shortner? 16:25:52 yup its happening 16:26:07 http://bit.ly/1iS6krb 16:26:29 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bugs?field.assignee=rpcdocs 16:27:17 these are the items we have with docimpact that may beed work 16:27:18 #link http://bit.ly/1izGIiZ 16:27:30 if anyone has cycles to help out thata would be great. 16:27:58 I'm not sure to fully understand the DocImpact, I thought it was required to tag DocImpact when there is a change that can impact docs, even if the change is about docs itself 16:28:01 is this still right? 16:28:24 id say yes 16:28:28 ok 16:28:35 noooo 16:28:39 but the OS infra system will create an issue in launchpad 16:28:44 anytime you use the tag 16:28:53 you use docimpact if you have a code change that requires docs, but does not include docs 16:29:12 ok Sam-I-Am 16:29:12 if you include docimpact with a docs patch, it makes a new bug that tells docs folks it needs documentation 16:29:14 ^ from the docs people. 16:29:27 realistically, you should include docs with your patch 16:29:40 so lets stop doing that from now on :) 16:29:41 then if you want help making them better, tag a docs person in the review 16:29:41 Sam-I-Am: I thought this was need to follow branches 16:30:03 in order to follow the documentation changes accross merges, starting from master to the end branch 16:30:39 -1 if no doc is provided then 16:30:42 ok 16:31:02 what do you mean? 16:31:21 the best way to achieve good docs is to not merge if there is no doc ;) 16:31:26 well, yeah 16:31:35 docimpact is just a way to toss it over the fence 16:31:40 usually to someone that doesnt understand what you did 16:31:53 its best used when something is obvious 16:31:55 I am a fan of rather including docs as we go. 16:32:08 yeah, I think it should be done that way too 16:32:22 I've put docimpact in the past to track the docchanges 16:32:40 yeah, and it made a mess of docs bug tracking 16:32:47 ^ me too 16:32:51 'hey wait, this is docs' 16:32:53 I do think that there's some base work that needs to be done to update the docs to make this entirely feasible, but that's not going to happen unless we start to enforce it. 16:33:04 ++ 16:33:09 +1 16:33:35 I'll help fix what I broke in the docs personnally Sam-I-Am. Mea culpa! 16:33:40 #action Everyone - start -1 changes that dont had docs 16:33:42 people either tag me in reviews, or i see docs things when i look through all reviews 16:33:54 so regarding all of these things - http://bit.ly/1izGIiZ http://bit.ly/1iS6krb - we need to pick through doc the changes where needed and close items that are irrelevant. 16:35:59 moving on 16:36:03 #topic Reviews 16:36:14 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/starredby:cloudnull+status:open,n,z 16:36:22 #link http://bit.ly/openstack-ansible-review-starred 16:36:30 these are some inflight things that need to be looked at 16:40:32 sorry ... irc bouncer connection was dropped 16:41:26 we always need more reviews. and if you can help out on some of the inflight changes it would be most appreciated. 16:41:37 noted 16:41:55 #topic Upcoming Milestones 16:42:05 #link https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/liberty-3 16:42:24 oops, forgot to update that - that one's been released 16:42:40 12.0.0 is the next for master 16:42:49 #link https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/12.0.0 16:42:55 ha. 16:43:04 was looking at that thinking damn we're awesome ! 16:43:40 and for kilo 16:43:46 #link https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/11.2.2 16:43:59 sorry 16:44:03 #link https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/11.2.3 16:44:19 actually 16:44:22 #link https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/11.2.3 16:44:27 ha 16:44:40 i have a couple things to add to that but otherwise kilo is looking nice 16:44:47 what's the deadline for it? 16:45:00 2015-09-25 16:45:01 this needs to go in for that https://review.openstack.org/224562 16:45:03 11 september according to launchpad ;) 16:45:18 for 11.2.3 16:45:41 * odyssey4me forgot to update the agenda 16:46:15 me too 16:46:30 so lastly 16:46:33 if any other patches get backports then we'll add them to that milestone 16:46:33 #topic Open discussion 16:46:50 elections? 16:47:01 sure 16:47:05 cloudnull: you don't continue to be PTL? 16:47:17 elections are September 18 - September 24 16:47:20 don't want to* 16:47:24 https://github.com/openstack/election/tree/master/candidates/mitaka/OpenStackAnsible 16:47:31 evrardjp: nope im stepping aside 16:47:42 time for someone new :) 16:47:55 thanks for helping bring us this far cloudnull 16:47:57 it's cool to let the others do, too. ;) 16:48:05 yeah ty 16:48:06 it is 16:48:22 and good luck to our only candidate for now ;) 16:48:33 so far our only candidate is odyssey4me , that said if someone wants to run please submit your proposal 16:48:36 the only one crazy enough 16:48:43 the rest of us like our health 16:48:50 :) 16:48:52 lol 16:48:57 well, marginally better health 16:49:08 moar beer youll be fine 16:49:13 so on the topic, I'd like to suggest that we rotate the chair for the bug triage and community meetings 16:49:15 I've looked at his punchcard recently, yeah it's impressive... Most of you are ;) 16:49:34 odyssey4me: ++ 16:50:03 ideally I'm thinking along the lines of someone volunteering to be the next chair early in the meeting 16:50:22 I think thats a great idea 16:50:23 that way not all responsibility sits on one person all the time 16:50:53 #vote should we have a rotating chair in meeting, yes or no? 16:51:06 it makes sense 16:51:14 yes 16:51:38 opps 16:51:40 #startvote should we have a rotating chair in meeting, yes or no? 16:51:40 Begin voting on: should we have a rotating chair in meeting, yes or no? Valid vote options are Yes, No. 16:51:41 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 16:51:53 #vote yes 16:51:55 now go vote :) 16:51:58 #vote yes 16:51:59 #vote yes 16:52:14 #vote yes 16:52:19 #vote yes 16:52:49 while that happening , anything else anyone wants to bring up ? 16:52:54 well then 16:53:13 #vote yes 16:54:22 #endvote 16:54:27 Voted on "should we have a rotating chair in meeting, yes or no?" Results are 16:54:35 so i think thats all we've got today . 16:54:47 it seems so 16:54:47 Results are... ? 16:55:04 it seems the bot is at a loss of words 16:55:08 fail 16:55:08 lol 16:55:22 maybe its case sensitive? 16:55:25 likely because we all said, yes and not Yes 16:55:28 :) 16:55:51 it could have said "0% Yes" 16:55:53 #action everyone - start a rotating chair at the beginning of meetings 16:55:59 so we're done here. 16:56:01 such a good bot 16:56:03 thanks everyone 16:56:03 k thx 16:56:06 cya 16:56:09 have a good one 16:56:11 #endmeeting