16:02:25 <evrardjp> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:02:26 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Oct 24 16:02:25 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is evrardjp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:27 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:02:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:02:41 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1724538 16:02:43 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1724538 in openstack-ansible "gnocchi install api runtime error numpy version 0xa 0xb" [Undecided,New] 16:02:57 <andymccr> gnocchi 16:02:58 <andymccr> fun 16:02:58 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix typo https://review.openstack.org/514686 16:03:00 <evrardjp> confirmed medium 16:03:19 <odyssey4me> o/ 16:03:20 <evrardjp> I've been working with some ppl it's a requirements problem. We can pin it. 16:03:25 <evrardjp> in the gnocchi role 16:03:32 <evrardjp> (to be proven) 16:03:35 <andymccr> ack 16:03:54 <evrardjp> ok next then 16:03:56 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1724025 16:03:57 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1724025 in openstack-ansible "https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/master/tests/roles/bootstrap-host/tasks/check-requirements.yml invalid regular expression to identify the space available in /" [Undecided,New] 16:04:22 <andymccr> hmm 16:04:23 <evrardjp> have you seen that? 16:04:43 <andymccr> no - i would've thought we'd see a lot of failures for that if it was broken 16:05:05 <odyssey4me> never seen it - looking 16:05:33 <evrardjp> yeah, so question is: do we override that in our gateS? 16:05:36 <evrardjp> to skip the test/ 16:05:42 <evrardjp> skip the test? * 16:05:49 <andymccr> i wouldnt have thought so 16:05:56 <andymccr> i mean if we do, thats really not good 16:06:29 <odyssey4me> no we don't 16:06:52 <odyssey4me> but some nodes have root disk space, and some have second disks 16:06:58 <odyssey4me> not sure what the profile is these days 16:07:11 <odyssey4me> this is only touching those which need to use the root disk space 16:07:18 <odyssey4me> I can take a peek at that 16:07:20 <evrardjp> ok 16:07:27 <evrardjp> I don't mark it as confirmed right now 16:08:36 <xgerman_> evrajdip: so I need to 1) Migrate my job to zuul 2) Review/Fix tests 16:08:47 <evrardjp> andymccr: will love the next one 16:08:50 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1723257 16:08:51 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1723257 in openstack-ansible "Pike: can't install nova-compute and ceph-osd side by side" [Undecided,New] 16:09:01 <evrardjp> xgerman_: this is bug triage but yes. 16:09:03 <evrardjp> :) 16:09:05 <evrardjp> thanks xgerman_! 16:09:07 <xgerman_> k 16:09:23 <evrardjp> I can help you on the patterns 16:09:29 <evrardjp> let's sync after the meeting 16:09:35 <andymccr> hmm 16:10:16 <andymccr> didnt we add ceph v3 support? logan- ? 16:10:35 <logan-> note yet :( 16:10:35 <logan-> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/512655/ 16:10:38 <logan-> not yet* 16:10:43 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/ansible-hardening stable/ocata: Zuulv3 jobs for Ocata https://review.openstack.org/514443 16:10:44 <logan-> gate roulette 16:10:51 <andymccr> hes talking about stable anyway. 16:11:00 <logan-> yeah 16:11:03 <logan-> we have v3 in master 16:11:07 <evrardjp> yeah but I think for Pike it's better to move to v3 16:11:07 <logan-> that patch is stable/pike 16:11:14 <andymccr> ahh ok 16:11:19 <andymccr> yeah makes sense 16:11:31 <evrardjp> Because right now Pike is pinned with a beta sha, IIRC 16:11:33 <spotz> o/ 16:11:35 <evrardjp> right logan-? 16:11:40 <andymccr> ok i'll take a look at helping get that to work 16:11:44 <logan-> correct evrardjp 16:11:53 <andymccr> it seems like the correct solution is to move to ceph-ansible v3.0.4 or w/e 16:11:54 <evrardjp> andymccr: logan-: has already something pending 16:12:02 <andymccr> yeah he pasted it evrardjp :D 16:12:03 <evrardjp> andymccr: yes it would be nice 16:12:05 <evrardjp> darn 16:12:07 <evrardjp> sorry 16:12:13 <andymccr> i dont remember it being that complicated though 16:12:25 <andymccr> to move to v3 that is 16:12:25 <logan-> ah right 3.0.4 tagged now, should prob bump the tags in that patch 16:12:33 <logan-> its all v3.0.3 in there 16:13:03 <andymccr> ok cool will put some work into that 16:13:05 <evrardjp> that's detail, and it can be picked in the a-r-r bumps I GUESS 16:13:11 <andymccr> i'll put a comment in the bug 16:13:12 <evrardjp> woops on all caps 16:13:16 <evrardjp> ok great 16:13:18 <evrardjp> thanks all! 16:13:29 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1723029 16:13:30 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1723029 in openstack-ansible "nova-console-container spice not installing correct" [Undecided,New] 16:13:31 <odyssey4me> evrardjp a-r-r bumps don't do external repositories ;) 16:13:37 <evrardjp> odyssey4me: it does now. 16:13:39 <evrardjp> :D 16:13:44 <evrardjp> optionally 16:13:46 <odyssey4me> interesting - ok 16:13:46 <evrardjp> well 16:13:57 <evrardjp> long story I will skip that for the triage :p 16:14:10 <openstackgerrit> Logan V proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/pike: Add ceph-ansible v3 support https://review.openstack.org/512655 16:15:05 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/pike: Use the deployment host to download images for tempest https://review.openstack.org/514571 16:15:06 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-tests stable/ocata: Add voting CentOS. https://review.openstack.org/514445 16:15:06 <evrardjp> thaat could have been nice to have a branch there 16:15:18 <evrardjp> it looks like there is placement, which makes it O and above 16:16:08 <evrardjp> spice looks ok to me 16:16:16 <evrardjp> any idea? 16:16:50 <andymccr> hmm 16:16:53 <andymccr> we need more info 16:16:56 <andymccr> did tasks fail? 16:17:01 <andymccr> what version is he running 16:17:08 <evrardjp> ok 16:17:12 <evrardjp> woops 16:17:16 <evrardjp> I meant I agree. 16:17:24 <andymccr> would also be good to know if it actually installed hte packages 16:17:28 <andymccr> e.g. is spice installed and just not running 16:17:30 <andymccr> cos it failed to start 16:17:32 <andymccr> or whats the deal 16:18:27 <evrardjp> ok I will comment on the bug 16:18:28 <evrardjp> next 16:18:28 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1722200 16:18:29 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1722200 in openstack-ansible "percona-xtrabackup unmet dependencies" [Undecided,New] 16:19:56 <andymccr> if the gate failed 16:19:57 <evrardjp> has anyone experienced that? 16:19:59 <andymccr> then confirmed at the least ;D 16:20:19 <evrardjp> well I haven't seen a gate failure 16:20:31 <andymccr> ohh upgraded fine 16:20:36 <odyssey4me> we're not seeing it in the gate, and the only time I've seen that sort of thing is when using your own repositories 16:20:46 <odyssey4me> your comment is fair - need more details 16:21:04 <evrardjp> ok 16:21:11 <evrardjp> so we agree: Incomplete. 16:21:13 <andymccr> py3.5 seems weird 16:21:43 <evrardjp> fun with ceilometer for next: 16:21:46 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1721554 16:21:48 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1721554 in openstack-ansible "os_ceilometer fails without swift installed" [Medium,New] 16:22:22 <evrardjp> it seems we recently have a series of ppl wanting Telemetry. I am trying to convert them to maintaining the role, but I am not successful yet :D 16:22:59 <odyssey4me> that seems like vars with no defaults in the role 16:23:06 <evrardjp> this can potentially come from the move of the group vars 16:23:16 <odyssey4me> and yes, perhaps that too 16:23:40 <odyssey4me> although, this is pike - I don't think we did a port back of the scoping changes 16:23:51 <evrardjp> it was master at that time 16:24:15 <evrardjp> I mean the group vars change happened in master during the Pike timeframe 16:24:21 <evrardjp> IIRC 16:24:35 <odyssey4me> no, the scoping patch came after pike released 16:24:37 <evrardjp> or maybe that's not it. 16:24:39 <evrardjp> ok 16:24:52 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add python as an install step https://review.openstack.org/514335 16:25:09 <odyssey4me> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504804/ 16:25:21 <odyssey4me> that's only in master 16:25:21 <evrardjp> until someone confirms it, should we leave the bug as is? 16:25:55 <odyssey4me> given that autoscaling is a popular use-case, we might have to figure out how to test it periodically or something 16:26:37 <evrardjp> yeah that would be nice to get some contributions, I will send a call to the ML with a link to an etherpad, listing what should be done for the telemetry stack 16:26:50 <evrardjp> if we have enough time this cycle, I can work on it 16:27:03 <evrardjp> but right now it's low on our prio list, so we'll see if someone steps up. 16:27:22 <evrardjp> in the meantime, I suggest we leave the bug as is, stating we need more ppl to triage the bug 16:28:03 <evrardjp> next 16:28:05 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1719517 16:28:06 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1719517 in openstack-ansible "Ceilometer policy.json includes python unicode encoding" [Undecided,New] 16:28:08 <evrardjp> more ceilometer... 16:28:31 <spotz> bleh 16:28:37 <evrardjp> ceilometer has no tests in O/P 16:28:46 <evrardjp> it won't pass 16:28:48 <andymccr> ceilometer <3 16:28:52 <andymccr> seriously 16:29:00 <andymccr> if everybody who filed a bug for ceilometer/gnocchi just helped to maintain the role 16:29:04 <andymccr> we would have 0 bugs for ceilomter/gnocchi 16:29:29 <evrardjp> yeah. 16:29:52 <evrardjp> I fixed something in master for gnocchi, but that's not enough, we need more contributions 16:30:07 <evrardjp> Still, because it passes master, we are in a weird state for role maturity. 16:30:55 <RandomTech> hey everyone, i have encountered a problem 16:30:58 <andymccr> ppl seem to like them though 16:31:00 <evrardjp> let's leave it as is. I will just add them into the etherpad and send the mail to the ML 16:31:12 <evrardjp> andymccr: the bugs? 16:31:23 <evrardjp> or the Telemetry stack :p 16:31:30 <evrardjp> ok let's move on 16:31:34 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1714597 16:31:35 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1714597 in openstack-ansible "multi OS repo-build needs to be more intuitive " [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Jesse Pretorius (jesse-pretorius) 16:31:41 <andymccr> the stack 16:31:46 <RandomTech> I tried to run register with template and it threw an error. any sugestions? 16:31:48 <evrardjp> RandomTech: we'll handle that after our meeting if you don't mind 16:31:56 <RandomTech> okay 16:32:06 <evrardjp> that is an old bug 16:32:07 <RandomTech> no rush 16:32:35 <evrardjp> odyssey4me: do you remember what we discussed in that triage, or should I get the logs back? 16:33:09 <odyssey4me> I haven't had a chance to look at it - as discussed previously I need some sort of repeatable test environment to very it and fix it. 16:33:20 <odyssey4me> as yet it's not confirmed 16:34:05 <evrardjp> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2017/openstack_ansible_meeting.2017-10-10-16.01.log.html#l-238 16:34:10 <odyssey4me> the mentioned patch in the comments there possibly fixed it, if it was an issue 16:34:13 <evrardjp> ok 16:34:26 <evrardjp> let's leave it as is, he will expire if we can't find time. 16:34:41 <evrardjp> it has no priority since it's maybe fixed. 16:34:53 <evrardjp> next 16:34:54 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1708360 16:34:55 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1708360 in openstack-ansible "Openstack-Ansible Install Fails with OVS" [Undecided,New] 16:35:14 <evrardjp> still no resources I guess? 16:35:44 <evrardjp> anyone up for the OVS challenge yet? 16:35:52 <evrardjp> 5 16:35:53 <evrardjp> 4 16:35:54 <evrardjp> 3 16:35:56 <evrardjp> 2 16:35:57 <evrardjp> 1 16:35:58 <evrardjp> next! 16:36:00 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1707142 16:36:01 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1707142 in openstack-ansible "pip_install: "The following packages cannot be authenticated"" [Undecided,New] 16:36:30 <evrardjp> Has someone seen that? 16:36:37 <evrardjp> we can leave it as is 16:36:49 <andymccr> ive not seen that 16:37:14 <andymccr> would love to see ovs testing/work but hey ;P thats been cycles 16:37:54 <evrardjp> well that's gonna need to be part of some opnfv work, so we're gonna get there :) 16:38:11 <evrardjp> ok next 16:38:13 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1706446 16:38:14 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1706446 in openstack-ansible "Keystone bootstrap failed when using LDAP" [Undecided,New] 16:38:28 <evrardjp> nothing new under the horizon? 16:38:59 <evrardjp> pun intended 16:39:05 <andymccr> i got nothing on that ;D 16:39:14 <evrardjp> ok let's move on 16:39:21 <odyssey4me> 'upgrade to mitaka' - I thought we agree ages ago that mitaka is EOL and therefore the bug cannot be fixed 16:39:22 <evrardjp> we are forced to do that... 16:39:45 <evrardjp> oh yeah we are probably waiting for expiry 16:39:53 <odyssey4me> ah - previous discussion 16:40:24 <odyssey4me> an ldap back-end test has long been on my list 16:40:28 <odyssey4me> but it's a long list 16:40:42 <evrardjp> haha 16:40:44 <evrardjp> yeah. 16:40:56 <evrardjp> well it doesn't matter for now for this triage! 16:41:00 <odyssey4me> this is a wontfix simply because mitaka is EOL 16:41:05 <odyssey4me> no need to wait for expiry 16:41:19 <andymccr> we cant fix 16:41:22 <andymccr> cant fix wont fix 16:41:58 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_almanach stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514747 16:42:03 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514748 16:42:03 <odyssey4me> never mind the fact that service accounts are not designed, in keystone, to be in LDAP 16:42:08 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514749 16:42:11 <openstackgerrit> Bjoern Teipel proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Document reasonable radosgw timeout https://review.openstack.org/514750 16:42:11 <odyssey4me> they're supposed to be in the DB only 16:42:13 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514751 16:42:23 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514752 16:42:40 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514753 16:42:45 <evrardjp> I marked it in won't fix 16:42:51 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_monasca stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514754 16:43:02 <evrardjp> doesn't fit openstack project plans to fix this 16:43:06 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514755 16:43:22 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zaqar stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.openstack.org/514756 16:43:26 <evrardjp> ok the next ones are in the same state. 16:43:38 <evrardjp> so I guess we are done for today 16:43:44 <evrardjp> is there anything to add for someone? 16:43:49 <andymccr> nothing from me 16:43:58 <evrardjp> ok 16:44:02 <evrardjp> let's wrap up then! 16:44:10 <evrardjp> thanks everyone! 16:44:12 <evrardjp> #endmeeting