16:02:25 <evrardjp> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting
16:02:26 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Oct 24 16:02:25 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is evrardjp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:02:27 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:02:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'
16:02:41 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1724538
16:02:43 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1724538 in openstack-ansible "gnocchi install api runtime error numpy version 0xa 0xb" [Undecided,New]
16:02:57 <andymccr> gnocchi
16:02:58 <andymccr> fun
16:02:58 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix typo  https://review.openstack.org/514686
16:03:00 <evrardjp> confirmed medium
16:03:19 <odyssey4me> o/
16:03:20 <evrardjp> I've been working with some ppl it's a requirements problem. We can pin it.
16:03:25 <evrardjp> in the gnocchi role
16:03:32 <evrardjp> (to be proven)
16:03:35 <andymccr> ack
16:03:54 <evrardjp> ok next then
16:03:56 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1724025
16:03:57 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1724025 in openstack-ansible "https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/master/tests/roles/bootstrap-host/tasks/check-requirements.yml invalid regular expression to identify the space available in /" [Undecided,New]
16:04:22 <andymccr> hmm
16:04:23 <evrardjp> have you seen that?
16:04:43 <andymccr> no - i would've thought we'd see a lot of failures for that if it was broken
16:05:05 <odyssey4me> never seen it - looking
16:05:33 <evrardjp> yeah, so question is: do we override that in our gateS?
16:05:36 <evrardjp> to skip the test/
16:05:42 <evrardjp> skip the test? *
16:05:49 <andymccr> i wouldnt have thought so
16:05:56 <andymccr> i mean if we do, thats really not good
16:06:29 <odyssey4me> no we don't
16:06:52 <odyssey4me> but some nodes have root disk space, and some have second disks
16:06:58 <odyssey4me> not sure what the profile is these days
16:07:11 <odyssey4me> this is only touching those which need to use the root disk space
16:07:18 <odyssey4me> I can take a peek at that
16:07:20 <evrardjp> ok
16:07:27 <evrardjp> I don't mark it as confirmed right now
16:08:36 <xgerman_> evrajdip: so I need to 1) Migrate my job to zuul 2) Review/Fix tests
16:08:47 <evrardjp> andymccr: will love the next one
16:08:50 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1723257
16:08:51 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1723257 in openstack-ansible "Pike: can't install nova-compute and ceph-osd side by side" [Undecided,New]
16:09:01 <evrardjp> xgerman_: this is bug triage but yes.
16:09:03 <evrardjp> :)
16:09:05 <evrardjp> thanks xgerman_!
16:09:07 <xgerman_> k
16:09:23 <evrardjp> I can help you on the patterns
16:09:29 <evrardjp> let's sync after the meeting
16:09:35 <andymccr> hmm
16:10:16 <andymccr> didnt we add ceph v3 support? logan- ?
16:10:35 <logan-> note yet :(
16:10:35 <logan-> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/512655/
16:10:38 <logan-> not yet*
16:10:43 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/ansible-hardening stable/ocata: Zuulv3 jobs for Ocata  https://review.openstack.org/514443
16:10:44 <logan-> gate roulette
16:10:51 <andymccr> hes talking about stable anyway.
16:11:00 <logan-> yeah
16:11:03 <logan-> we have v3 in master
16:11:07 <evrardjp> yeah but I think for Pike it's better to move to v3
16:11:07 <logan-> that patch is stable/pike
16:11:14 <andymccr> ahh ok
16:11:19 <andymccr> yeah makes sense
16:11:31 <evrardjp> Because right now Pike is pinned with a beta sha, IIRC
16:11:33 <spotz> o/
16:11:35 <evrardjp> right logan-?
16:11:40 <andymccr> ok i'll take a look at helping get that to work
16:11:44 <logan-> correct evrardjp
16:11:53 <andymccr> it seems like the correct solution is to move to ceph-ansible v3.0.4 or w/e
16:11:54 <evrardjp> andymccr: logan-: has already something pending
16:12:02 <andymccr> yeah he pasted it evrardjp :D
16:12:03 <evrardjp> andymccr: yes it would be nice
16:12:05 <evrardjp> darn
16:12:07 <evrardjp> sorry
16:12:13 <andymccr> i dont remember it being that complicated though
16:12:25 <andymccr> to move to v3 that is
16:12:25 <logan-> ah right 3.0.4 tagged now, should prob bump the tags in that patch
16:12:33 <logan-> its all v3.0.3 in there
16:13:03 <andymccr> ok cool will put some work into that
16:13:05 <evrardjp> that's detail, and it can be picked in the a-r-r bumps I GUESS
16:13:11 <andymccr> i'll put a comment in the bug
16:13:12 <evrardjp> woops on all caps
16:13:16 <evrardjp> ok great
16:13:18 <evrardjp> thanks all!
16:13:29 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1723029
16:13:30 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1723029 in openstack-ansible "nova-console-container spice not installing correct" [Undecided,New]
16:13:31 <odyssey4me> evrardjp a-r-r bumps don't do external repositories ;)
16:13:37 <evrardjp> odyssey4me: it does now.
16:13:39 <evrardjp> :D
16:13:44 <evrardjp> optionally
16:13:46 <odyssey4me> interesting - ok
16:13:46 <evrardjp> well
16:13:57 <evrardjp> long story I will skip that for the triage :p
16:14:10 <openstackgerrit> Logan V proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/pike: Add ceph-ansible v3 support  https://review.openstack.org/512655
16:15:05 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest stable/pike: Use the deployment host to download images for tempest  https://review.openstack.org/514571
16:15:06 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-tests stable/ocata: Add voting CentOS.  https://review.openstack.org/514445
16:15:06 <evrardjp> thaat could have been nice to have a branch there
16:15:18 <evrardjp> it looks like there is placement, which makes it O and above
16:16:08 <evrardjp> spice looks ok to me
16:16:16 <evrardjp> any idea?
16:16:50 <andymccr> hmm
16:16:53 <andymccr> we need more info
16:16:56 <andymccr> did tasks fail?
16:17:01 <andymccr> what version is he running
16:17:08 <evrardjp> ok
16:17:12 <evrardjp> woops
16:17:16 <evrardjp> I meant I agree.
16:17:24 <andymccr> would also be good to know if it actually installed hte packages
16:17:28 <andymccr> e.g. is spice installed and just not running
16:17:30 <andymccr> cos it failed to start
16:17:32 <andymccr> or whats the deal
16:18:27 <evrardjp> ok I will comment on the bug
16:18:28 <evrardjp> next
16:18:28 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1722200
16:18:29 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1722200 in openstack-ansible "percona-xtrabackup unmet dependencies" [Undecided,New]
16:19:56 <andymccr> if the gate failed
16:19:57 <evrardjp> has anyone experienced that?
16:19:59 <andymccr> then confirmed at the least ;D
16:20:19 <evrardjp> well I haven't seen a gate failure
16:20:31 <andymccr> ohh upgraded fine
16:20:36 <odyssey4me> we're not seeing it in the gate, and the only time I've seen that sort of thing is when using your own repositories
16:20:46 <odyssey4me> your comment is fair - need more details
16:21:04 <evrardjp> ok
16:21:11 <evrardjp> so we agree: Incomplete.
16:21:13 <andymccr> py3.5 seems weird
16:21:43 <evrardjp> fun with ceilometer for next:
16:21:46 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1721554
16:21:48 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1721554 in openstack-ansible "os_ceilometer fails without swift installed" [Medium,New]
16:22:22 <evrardjp> it seems we recently have a series of ppl wanting Telemetry. I am trying to convert them to maintaining the role, but I am not successful yet :D
16:22:59 <odyssey4me> that seems like vars with no defaults in the role
16:23:06 <evrardjp> this can potentially come from the move of the group vars
16:23:16 <odyssey4me> and yes, perhaps that too
16:23:40 <odyssey4me> although, this is pike - I don't think we did a port back of the scoping changes
16:23:51 <evrardjp> it was master at that time
16:24:15 <evrardjp> I mean the group vars change happened in master during the Pike timeframe
16:24:21 <evrardjp> IIRC
16:24:35 <odyssey4me> no, the scoping patch came after pike released
16:24:37 <evrardjp> or maybe that's not it.
16:24:39 <evrardjp> ok
16:24:52 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add python as an install step  https://review.openstack.org/514335
16:25:09 <odyssey4me> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504804/
16:25:21 <odyssey4me> that's only in master
16:25:21 <evrardjp> until someone confirms it, should we leave the bug as is?
16:25:55 <odyssey4me> given that autoscaling is a popular use-case, we might have to figure out how to test it periodically or something
16:26:37 <evrardjp> yeah that would be nice to get some contributions, I will send a call to the ML with a link to an etherpad, listing what should be done for the telemetry stack
16:26:50 <evrardjp> if we have enough time this cycle, I can work on it
16:27:03 <evrardjp> but right now it's low on our prio list, so we'll see if someone steps up.
16:27:22 <evrardjp> in the meantime, I suggest we leave the bug as is, stating we need more ppl to triage the bug
16:28:03 <evrardjp> next
16:28:05 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1719517
16:28:06 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1719517 in openstack-ansible "Ceilometer policy.json includes python unicode encoding" [Undecided,New]
16:28:08 <evrardjp> more ceilometer...
16:28:31 <spotz> bleh
16:28:37 <evrardjp> ceilometer has no tests in O/P
16:28:46 <evrardjp> it won't pass
16:28:48 <andymccr> ceilometer <3
16:28:52 <andymccr> seriously
16:29:00 <andymccr> if everybody who filed a bug for ceilometer/gnocchi just helped to maintain the role
16:29:04 <andymccr> we would have 0 bugs for ceilomter/gnocchi
16:29:29 <evrardjp> yeah.
16:29:52 <evrardjp> I fixed something in master for gnocchi, but that's not enough, we need more contributions
16:30:07 <evrardjp> Still, because it passes master, we are in a weird state for role maturity.
16:30:55 <RandomTech> hey everyone, i have encountered a problem
16:30:58 <andymccr> ppl seem to like them though
16:31:00 <evrardjp> let's leave it as is. I will just add them into the etherpad and send the mail to the ML
16:31:12 <evrardjp> andymccr: the bugs?
16:31:23 <evrardjp> or the Telemetry stack :p
16:31:30 <evrardjp> ok let's move on
16:31:34 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1714597
16:31:35 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1714597 in openstack-ansible "multi OS repo-build needs to be more intuitive " [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Jesse Pretorius (jesse-pretorius)
16:31:41 <andymccr> the stack
16:31:46 <RandomTech> I tried to run register with template and it threw an error. any sugestions?
16:31:48 <evrardjp> RandomTech: we'll handle that after our meeting if you don't mind
16:31:56 <RandomTech> okay
16:32:06 <evrardjp> that is an old bug
16:32:07 <RandomTech> no rush
16:32:35 <evrardjp> odyssey4me: do you remember what we discussed in that triage, or should I get the logs back?
16:33:09 <odyssey4me> I haven't had a chance to look at it - as discussed previously I need some sort of repeatable test environment to very it and fix it.
16:33:20 <odyssey4me> as yet it's not confirmed
16:34:05 <evrardjp> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2017/openstack_ansible_meeting.2017-10-10-16.01.log.html#l-238
16:34:10 <odyssey4me> the mentioned patch in the comments there possibly fixed it, if it was an issue
16:34:13 <evrardjp> ok
16:34:26 <evrardjp> let's leave it as is, he will expire if we can't find time.
16:34:41 <evrardjp> it has no priority since it's maybe fixed.
16:34:53 <evrardjp> next
16:34:54 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1708360
16:34:55 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1708360 in openstack-ansible "Openstack-Ansible Install Fails with OVS" [Undecided,New]
16:35:14 <evrardjp> still no resources I guess?
16:35:44 <evrardjp> anyone up for the OVS challenge yet?
16:35:52 <evrardjp> 5
16:35:53 <evrardjp> 4
16:35:54 <evrardjp> 3
16:35:56 <evrardjp> 2
16:35:57 <evrardjp> 1
16:35:58 <evrardjp> next!
16:36:00 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1707142
16:36:01 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1707142 in openstack-ansible "pip_install: "The following packages cannot be authenticated"" [Undecided,New]
16:36:30 <evrardjp> Has someone seen that?
16:36:37 <evrardjp> we can leave it as is
16:36:49 <andymccr> ive not seen that
16:37:14 <andymccr> would love to see ovs testing/work but hey ;P thats been cycles
16:37:54 <evrardjp> well that's gonna need to be part of some opnfv work, so we're gonna get there :)
16:38:11 <evrardjp> ok next
16:38:13 <evrardjp> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1706446
16:38:14 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1706446 in openstack-ansible "Keystone bootstrap failed when using LDAP" [Undecided,New]
16:38:28 <evrardjp> nothing new under the horizon?
16:38:59 <evrardjp> pun intended
16:39:05 <andymccr> i got nothing on that ;D
16:39:14 <evrardjp> ok let's move on
16:39:21 <odyssey4me> 'upgrade to mitaka' - I thought we agree ages ago that mitaka is EOL and therefore the bug cannot be fixed
16:39:22 <evrardjp> we are forced to do that...
16:39:45 <evrardjp> oh yeah we are probably waiting for expiry
16:39:53 <odyssey4me> ah - previous discussion
16:40:24 <odyssey4me> an ldap back-end test has long been on my list
16:40:28 <odyssey4me> but it's a long list
16:40:42 <evrardjp> haha
16:40:44 <evrardjp> yeah.
16:40:56 <evrardjp> well it doesn't matter for now for this triage!
16:41:00 <odyssey4me> this is a wontfix simply because mitaka is EOL
16:41:05 <odyssey4me> no need to wait for expiry
16:41:19 <andymccr> we cant fix
16:41:22 <andymccr> cant fix wont fix
16:41:58 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_almanach stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514747
16:42:03 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514748
16:42:03 <odyssey4me> never mind the fact that service accounts are not designed, in keystone, to be in LDAP
16:42:08 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514749
16:42:11 <openstackgerrit> Bjoern Teipel proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Document reasonable radosgw timeout  https://review.openstack.org/514750
16:42:11 <odyssey4me> they're supposed to be in the DB only
16:42:13 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514751
16:42:23 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514752
16:42:40 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514753
16:42:45 <evrardjp> I marked it in won't fix
16:42:51 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_monasca stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514754
16:43:02 <evrardjp> doesn't fit openstack project plans to fix this
16:43:06 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514755
16:43:22 <openstackgerrit> OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zaqar stable/ocata: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.openstack.org/514756
16:43:26 <evrardjp> ok the next ones are in the same state.
16:43:38 <evrardjp> so I guess we are done for today
16:43:44 <evrardjp> is there anything to add for someone?
16:43:49 <andymccr> nothing from me
16:43:58 <evrardjp> ok
16:44:02 <evrardjp> let's wrap up then!
16:44:10 <evrardjp> thanks everyone!
16:44:12 <evrardjp> #endmeeting