15:59:52 #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 15:59:53 Meeting started Tue Jan 23 15:59:52 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is evrardjp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:59:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:59:56 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:00:03 #topic rollcall 16:00:20 \o/ 16:00:45 hello spotz :) 16:00:52 hola 16:01:15 giving a couple of minutes before starting the thing... 16:02:17 #topic Focus of the week 16:02:36 o/ 16:02:46 o/ 16:03:03 o/ 16:03:05 The FOTW (focus of the week, not fall of the wall) for this week should be "get your stuff in". 16:03:39 I think we have stabilized things the last two weeks, and I am confident the last bugs to iron out are easy to fix, so I think we should continue to innovate now! 16:04:16 next week is community meeting we should plan the 4 next focus of the week there. 16:04:27 ok let's move on to... 16:04:37 the real deal 16:04:43 #topic bug triage 16:04:57 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1744681 16:04:58 Launchpad bug 1744681 in openstack-ansible "Appendix B: Example production environment configuration in OpenStack-Ansible: clarification of infra load-balancers" [Undecided,Invalid] 16:05:32 I started to triage this one a little earlier, so I'd like to know if my triage was correct. 16:05:51 If nobody complaints about this one, I move on. 16:06:17 it could be a doc bug, but I think it's more a support request. 16:06:34 yeah i agree 16:06:38 ok 16:06:41 let's move on then 16:06:46 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1744458 16:06:47 Launchpad bug 1744458 in openstack-ansible "Failed to build cradox on CentOS7 " [Undecided,Incomplete] 16:06:54 mgariepy: mhayden are you there? 16:07:09 evrardjp: yeah, in a video meeting :/ 16:07:42 :( 16:08:11 ok if nobody can confirm, I'll leave it as new, instead of incomplete. 16:08:49 the bug reporter gave all the information to confirm, we just don't have enough resources to check right now. 16:08:50 ok 16:08:52 next 16:08:57 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1744014 16:08:58 Launchpad bug 1744014 in openstack-ansible "Backups in OpenStack-Ansible" [Undecided,New] 16:10:02 That seems valid and problematic indeed. It's not because we install xtrabackup that we do the backups. 16:10:26 I think that we are giving false expectations there, so I'd mark it as confirmed and high 16:10:34 or medium 16:11:02 sorry i dont have time to validate 16:11:33 mgariepy: no worries. 16:12:01 ok let's move on if ppl agree with the confirmed / medium for the docs issue. 16:12:17 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1743805 16:12:18 Launchpad bug 1743805 in openstack-ansible "neutron-db-manage fails on hostname with underscore" [Undecided,New] 16:12:49 I think we should mark it as incomplete, we don't know which branch... 16:13:13 agreed? 16:13:58 it might look like master, but I haven't seen that issue in master. 16:14:31 ok 16:14:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1743032 16:14:45 Launchpad bug 1743032 in openstack-ansible "Galera cluster maintenance in OpenStack-Ansible" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Kevin Carter (kevin-carter) 16:15:04 cloudnull: do you have an update on this one? 16:15:54 I'll leave it as is then. 16:16:04 next 16:16:06 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741085 16:16:07 Launchpad bug 1741085 in openstack-ansible "Playbook ceph-install.yml won't boostrap cluster" [Undecided,New] 16:16:50 andymccr logan- should we go ahead and remove the serial part there? 16:17:17 For me the bug is completely invalid, as I see deploys with ceph working. 16:17:48 but I understand why we'd want to remove that barrier if that's not useful 16:18:32 better to variable it than remove it 16:18:42 that's what we discussed last week IIRC 16:19:07 logan- was also going to validate the issue 16:19:10 I think 16:19:39 yeah logan- said he will try to validate it 16:19:50 yeah I like the idea to variable it. 16:20:04 I answered on the bug, saying we don't have issue in the deploys in our gates. 16:20:07 that would be a good workaround for now 16:20:29 our gate only has one mon, so it's not a good test of the issue 16:20:55 oh I see. 16:22:10 ok I will leave it as is then. 16:22:41 next 16:22:43 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1739472 16:22:44 Launchpad bug 1739472 in openstack-ansible "mariadb-client excluded in ocata centos7 deploy" [Undecided,New] 16:23:02 anyone working on centos available to check that? 16:23:57 i could have a look at it since i am messing with galera already 16:24:04 *sigh* 16:24:06 that would be nice 16:24:11 sorry for that :( 16:24:20 please assign it to me 16:24:52 I think a vagrant machine should do the trick, see if there are issues there. 16:25:32 next 16:25:34 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1738860 16:25:34 Launchpad bug 1738860 in openstack-ansible "nginx-common dependency prevents repo container build" [Undecided,Incomplete] 16:25:56 Incomplete, ok for you? 16:26:57 yep 16:27:00 ok next 16:27:02 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1738529 16:27:04 Launchpad bug 1738529 in openstack-ansible "trove install fails" [Undecided,New] 16:28:22 well 16:28:26 seems valid i suppose 16:29:04 should we do something like https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/blob/b6b933df6f915fb91b7e28a177cffb2b5ebcc1e0/tasks/trove_service_network.yml#L57 at L72? 16:29:22 ivve: I checked it and it works well when os:nova:server is defined within the autoscalling group itself , here is the template , please note two methods that i have tried http://paste.openstack.org/show/650984 16:29:29 yeah it seems valid. 16:30:00 hwoarang: confirmed medium? 16:30:13 ivveh:^ 16:30:17 Andy McCrae proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Install mon servers in parallel. https://review.openstack.org/536891 16:30:18 that wasn't for hwoarang alone, sorry for that. 16:30:21 i think so 16:30:26 ok 16:30:43 next 16:30:47 thanks andymccr ;) 16:30:49 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1738451 16:30:49 Launchpad bug 1738451 in openstack-ansible "openstack_host_kernel_modules missing nf_conntrack_ipv6" [Undecided,New] 16:30:58 evrardjp: np, i added logan- as a reviewer and -w'd it until he reviews it :) 16:30:59 that looks valid and high. 16:31:08 andymccr: smart. 16:31:18 οκ 16:31:21 *ok 16:31:28 haha 16:31:34 keyboard tricks! 16:32:03 :) 16:32:08 so anyone agrees on confirmed and high for the conntrack? 16:32:17 oh you said ok. 16:32:23 for that :p 16:32:23 yeah fine by me 16:32:26 sounds reasonable 16:32:29 yeah seems sensible 16:32:47 next then 16:32:49 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1737827 16:32:50 Launchpad bug 1737827 in openstack-ansible "(ceph-client): setting 'nova_ceph_client' results in deployment where volumes can't be attached to VMs" [Undecided,New] 16:33:23 that's andymccr 's domain of expertise now, even if he'd say it's not :p 16:33:29 :D 16:34:17 hm 16:34:18 Bjoern Teipel proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops master: Add insecure flag for post upgrade CLI commands https://review.openstack.org/535973 16:34:37 that seems to me to be a var that exists to name space vars 16:34:43 and then you use group_vars to glue them 16:35:08 its kinda like saying if you change the default value of lots of settings it breaks things 16:35:11 yeah that could, but I like the idea of simplifying things with only one set :p 16:35:18 yeah 16:35:34 I think it's a big bug. 16:35:40 bhujay: cool, ill have a looksie 16:35:45 Confirmed and high? 16:35:52 i dont see how its high really 16:35:59 i mean if you change your keystone_endpoint vars to be something random they will fail too 16:36:01 yeah you're right. 16:36:25 im not really sure what the fix even is? unless we take all the ceph bits out of the individual roles and make them a playbook 16:36:28 which probably makes sense 16:36:41 yes I think it would make more sense... 16:36:58 but i think tahts a topic for the PTG :D 16:37:04 i will put a comment in that bug 16:37:09 you can add it then :D 16:38:10 ( andymccr : https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-rocky-ptg ) 16:38:15 ok next 16:38:28 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1729263 16:38:29 Launchpad bug 1729263 in openstack-ansible "Swift (master) transient tempest failures under centos " [Undecided,New] 16:38:40 let's leave it as is 16:38:42 move on 16:38:47 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1729014 16:38:48 Launchpad bug 1729014 in openstack-ansible "os_monasca: Pike: roles are pulling down master branch" [Undecided,New] 16:39:11 agreed with your comment there hwoarang 16:39:56 I don't know what we should do with things that are unmaintained 16:40:04 probably mark it as wishlist? 16:40:10 yeah 16:40:27 ok done 16:40:29 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1726936 16:40:31 Launchpad bug 1726936 in openstack-ansible "Configure rados_connect_timeout with reasonable timeout" [Undecided,Fix released] 16:40:41 just marked it fix released, so let's move on 16:40:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1721554 16:40:46 Launchpad bug 1721554 in openstack-ansible "os_ceilometer fails without swift installed" [Medium,New] 16:40:51 darn, ceilometer again. 16:41:09 I think that monasca issue is already resolved 16:41:18 odyssey4me: oh interesting 16:41:31 well it's still a whishlist if the role is unmaintained. 16:41:36 https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_monasca/commit/f58399356fcd3766316c726f6fd397482a191e05 16:41:54 nice :) 16:42:18 for ceilometer, I suggest we leave it as is for now. 16:42:30 marking fix released 16:42:43 odyssey4me: thanks :D 16:43:04 there is a team working on the monasca stuff around once per cycle to update it 16:43:18 oh interesting who is that? 16:43:21 the same team also tends to work on sahara and some other odds and ends 16:43:37 Maybe we should tell them to be maintainer of the role, they would get an easier life. 16:44:07 see https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstack-ansible-os_monasca for recent updates 16:44:42 they kinda do maintain it, just not actively all the time - only when they prep for their upgrades do they start testing and fixing 16:45:01 it's a university I think 16:45:05 mmm ok. I think it's a conversation for outside the bug triage 16:45:16 If I recall correctly, from Brasil 16:45:38 anyway... not helping the triage. Let's move on. 16:45:41 http://stackalytics.com/?module=openstackansible-group&company=universidade%20federal%20de%20campina%20grande 16:45:55 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1719517 16:45:56 Launchpad bug 1719517 in openstack-ansible "Ceilometer policy.json includes python unicode encoding" [Undecided,New] 16:46:17 odyssey4me: nice :) 16:46:25 I will contact them. 16:46:36 ah, that old chestnut - I thought there was a patch up for that already? 16:46:55 nope. 16:47:22 it was, and then it broke, and then things again, or am I mistaken? 16:47:30 https://review.openstack.org/507368 16:47:53 ah yes, as we don't have tests working we need to manually confirm that it works 16:48:04 or we just merge it? 16:48:41 haha 16:48:44 blind approach. 16:48:50 Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer stable/ocata: Initial OSA zuul v3 role jobs https://review.openstack.org/516640 16:49:03 I rechecked. 16:49:05 rebased the adding of tests on top of the patch - maybe it works or helps 16:49:05 ok 16:49:09 yeah 16:49:11 let's see. 16:49:33 wait. 16:50:15 I thought you'd do the opposite, but fine for me. 16:50:23 we'll see. 16:50:33 next one 16:50:35 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1698871 16:50:36 meh, same-same 16:50:37 Launchpad bug 1698871 in openstack-ansible "[master] [os_gnocchi]Gnocchi role tests failing on installing pip packages" [Undecided,New] 16:50:38 fun stuff. 16:50:59 always the same kind of trio of winners: telemetry, extra roles, and ceph. 16:51:13 thi s may be old and already fixed? 16:51:33 Invalid then 16:51:40 looks like it's working? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi 16:51:43 someone can reopn if needed. 16:51:51 yeah I kinda fixed master 16:52:19 that said, maybe it's an integrated build issue - but it seems like it's old if alextricity reported it 16:52:20 gokhan_: is helping a lot on this one 16:52:26 yeah. 16:52:41 I'd say it's safe to mark it as invalid for now. 16:52:54 sure 16:53:00 or need more info to reproduce 16:53:35 yup incomplete is better. This way it expires. 16:53:37 :D 16:53:44 ok so. 16:53:47 we are done for today. 16:53:52 we caught up everything. 16:54:08 there is one bonus that's not on the triage because I just filed it, but let's skip that for now. 16:54:13 so thanks everyone! 16:54:20 next week is community meeting 16:54:26 yay 16:55:10 we'll discuss PTG, focus of the weeks, liaisons can talk about what they want, and we'll also have the floor open for discussions on specs or anything (works with whiskey questions for Dublin) 16:55:23 have a good day everyone! 16:55:27 you too 16:55:28 #endmeeting