16:01:03 #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:01:04 Meeting started Tue Apr 10 16:01:03 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is evrardjp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:07 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:01:28 o/ 16:01:29 #topic "What happened since last meeting" 16:01:35 evrardjp reminds we have specs that need some eyes. 16:01:40 evrardjp says the newton EOL is in process, and only the integrated/tests repo are to EOL now. 16:01:42 o/ 16:01:55 o/ 16:01:56 evrardjp reminded the etherpad for vancouver forum: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-openstack-ansible-brainstorming 16:01:56 o/ 16:02:00 evrardjp said the next release will be queried according to plans, the 13 April. 16:02:03 o/ 16:02:04 odyssey4me suggested to use novnc instead of spice by default, or to have more than one method at the same time. 16:02:11 odyssey4me suggested changes to the tempest role: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-ansible/latest.log.html#t2018-04-10T12:19:33 (see also the conversation above this link for more context) 16:02:15 o/ 16:02:16 odyssey4me and hwoarang discussed the distribution package vs source install (http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-ansible/latest.log.html#t2018-04-10T09:35:54 ) 16:02:21 Two people asked for multi-region OSA deploys this week, and evrardjp proposed to add some user stories about it (http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-ansible/latest.log.html#t2018-04-10T09:13:45) using logan- 's example (http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-ansible/latest.log.html#t2018-04-10T11:44:11) 16:02:44 I let you a few minutes to process this, then let's move to bug triage 16:02:58 it also allows ppl to join :) 16:03:13 If you think I forgot to highlight something, please put it on the wiki 16:04:39 ok 16:04:49 I think it's time to continue 16:04:57 #topic Bug triage 16:04:59 Merged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/queens: repo-use.yml: Scope host groups properly https://review.openstack.org/559726 16:05:10 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1762483 16:05:11 Launchpad bug 1762483 in openstack-ansible "openstack-ansible rabbitmq-install.yml -e 'rabbitmq_upgrade=true' does not upgrade rabbitmq" [Undecided,New] 16:06:22 makes sense 16:06:22 that looks legit 16:06:31 since we moved suse/centos to not use latest 16:06:46 that's bad :p 16:07:01 That's also why I said we should do it on case by case in each role 16:07:07 but that thing got merged anyway 16:07:10 it's ok you only want that on upgrades 16:07:36 we can change the upgrade docs/code 16:07:44 let's mark it as confirmed and medium? 16:07:50 yeah 16:08:30 I always thought that it made better sense to use present and to have packages upgraded through a different playbook which you can target as you wish. 16:09:21 ok 16:09:35 let's do it this way then 16:09:42 Then we can use it for minor/major upgrades too. 16:10:01 I'll mark it as high instead 16:10:08 although in that role I suppose just tying the package state to whether the upgrade var is set or not will work as a workaround 16:10:17 and will be back portable 16:10:18 odyssey4me: we can also use a flip switch to load some variables only when upgrades 16:11:04 I'd rather do it in the role, because the role knows 16:11:08 and we set a convention 16:11:14 yeah 16:11:20 like "in_upgrade: False" by default in the role 16:11:30 anyway, I'd say high because it impacts upgrades quite seriously 16:11:34 and if someone does is_upgrade: True ->boom! 16:11:40 odyssey4me: agreed! 16:11:44 ok done deal 16:12:21 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1762459 16:12:22 Launchpad bug 1762459 in openstack-ansible "inventory-manage.py broken on 17.0.x" [Undecided,New] 16:12:25 I guess that one is solved? 16:12:36 yeah, should be 16:12:41 odyssey4me: it merged back in Q hasn't it? 16:12:52 ok will mark it as fix commited 16:12:56 one more review for the pike backport: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I6055df3da794439fb65ad2244445135dafb1cecf 16:13:21 next 16:13:24 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1762421 16:13:25 Launchpad bug 1762421 in openstack-ansible "openstack-ansible-galera_server role needlessly removes and reinstalls MariaDB-server" [Undecided,New] 16:13:36 odyssey4me: thanks! :) 16:14:04 yeah, apparently this one's back - someone's going to have to confirm and figure out a fix 16:14:13 wasn't mnaser looking at it during the PTG? 16:14:19 omg we should test this 16:14:28 I have started to work on idempotency testing 16:14:34 taking the patch from mhayden 16:14:40 but we should do it for galera_server 16:14:56 by running galera_client in the middle 16:14:58 :) 16:15:34 yeah the prob is that the MariaDB-server from mariadb repos defines 'mariadb-server' symbol 16:15:41 which collides with the one from the RDO repos 16:15:52 so you can't really tell if you are re moving the RDO package or the MariaDB package 16:16:05 ideally we shouldn't be removing anything and let dnf or yum figure out what to do 16:16:11 there must be a magic switch for that 16:16:11 hwoarang: I agree there 16:16:34 let's not compile mariadb from sources. 16:16:36 yeah, the package removal was only done because that was recommended by mariadb in their knowledgebase for the 5.5 -> 10 upgrade 16:16:36 :D 16:16:44 maybe we can remove it now? 16:16:51 we could try 16:17:00 now that we're beyond that, and their docs say to just install over the top of it, we should be able to just do that 16:17:28 it'd make the install/upgrade process quite a bit simpler too 16:18:16 yeah I think we are good to do that 16:18:24 I will push up a patch tomorrow 16:18:32 confirmed high? 16:18:49 not critical 16:18:54 yeah 16:18:59 but it's very disruptive to uninstall it 16:19:01 :p 16:19:22 if someone else wants to fix it, very welcome, I already have so much on my plate. 16:19:24 :D 16:19:25 well, it'll only be doing it to one server at a time - which is fine in a cluster, but not when you only have one ;) 16:19:33 next 16:19:41 odyssey4me: haha true 16:19:43 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1762051 16:19:44 Launchpad bug 1762051 in openstack-ansible "no logrotation on in /var/log/gnocchi (in gnocchi container)" [Undecided,New] 16:19:56 that looks legit 16:20:00 I never did it 16:20:02 :p 16:20:31 we should perhaps use ansible-role-logrotate for all our log rotation 16:20:54 https://github.com/openstack/ansible-role-logrotate 16:20:56 very simple role 16:21:27 I thought it was here: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-rsyslog_client/blob/master/templates/logrotate.j2 16:21:32 yeah maybe we should 16:22:29 confirmed medium? 16:22:37 looks like there should be log rotation done for gnocchi: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/master/playbooks/os-gnocchi-install.yml#L61 16:22:37 it's in pike too: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/blob/stable/pike/playbooks/os-gnocchi-install.yml#L58 16:22:37 yeah 16:22:54 well, actually, not confirmed - itlooks like there is, so we need proof of a bug 16:22:59 need more info 16:24:01 that's interesting 16:25:35 maybe it's not named .log ? 16:26:25 it should be, if https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi/blob/master/templates/gnocchi-systemd-init.j2#L13 is doing what it should 16:26:43 ok so no need to list it in rsyslog_client_log_files 16:26:43 odyssey4me thaaaaaaaanks a looooooooot everything worked properly with your help and there was no network issue thanks a lot. you are my hero. 16:27:03 qwebirc23189 no worries, glad you're over that hurdle 16:27:46 for me you're right it's not confirmed 16:27:49 Andy Smith proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests master: (WIP) Update to use oslo.messaging services for RPC and Notify https://review.openstack.org/559127 16:28:48 asking for more details in the bug 16:28:55 marking it as incomplete 16:28:58 next 16:29:09 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1761785 16:29:10 Launchpad bug 1761785 in openstack-ansible "Unbound listening on all interfaces" [Undecided,New] 16:29:49 Confirmed and low 16:29:53 ok for everyone? 16:29:56 yeah 16:30:10 next 16:30:12 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1761722 16:30:13 Launchpad bug 1761722 in openstack-ansible "inconsistency in documenting the use of eth12" [Undecided,New] 16:31:24 yeah, that's very likely 16:31:45 confirmed, I'd say medium given that this stuff is a reference 16:32:07 yep 16:32:09 coreywright: thanks for your analysis ;) 16:32:17 put notes in and I'll grab it 16:32:25 this is one where i don't feel able to write what it *should* say myself 16:32:39 jrosser: That's why I tell them to put notes in:) 16:32:54 I couldn't clarify either :/ 16:33:14 networking is confusing.... love spotz 16:33:39 anway historically lots of newcomers trip over this so it could do with a tidy 16:33:46 ArchiFleKs, yw! (and a quick work-around is to set `delegate_to: "{{ hostvars[random_conductor]['ansible_host'] }}"` 16:34:42 if you need wiring towards a container for your bridge ... 16:34:49 coreywright: thanks, are planning on proposing a patch ? I'm not sure a totally understood the way you would fix it 16:34:57 ArchiFleKs, instead of `delegate_to: "{{ random_conductor }}"`) 16:35:02 that could be simplified 16:35:10 coreywright: ArchiFleKs can you speak about that later please? 16:35:28 Let's mark it as confirmed and medium 16:35:41 and we should remove the documentation from this file, it's confusing everyone 16:35:50 let's put that into the documentation with examples 16:35:54 that can be more explanatory 16:36:05 more text than just comments 16:36:20 let's move on shall we? 16:36:27 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1761718 16:36:28 Launchpad bug 1761718 in openstack-ansible "container networks docs not updated for bare metal l3 agent deploy" [Undecided,New] 16:36:41 confirmed medium 16:37:00 yeah 16:37:03 cloudnull: could you check on both bugs ? 16:37:10 kill 2 birds one stone? 16:37:28 just explaining better what we did with the hyper converged? 16:38:01 I'm assigning it to you anyway :p 16:38:03 ok 16:38:05 let's move on 16:38:08 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1761550 16:38:09 Launchpad bug 1761550 in openstack-ansible "'Reload systemd deamon' handle not being called in neutron" [Undecided,New] 16:39:11 that is bad 16:39:27 if it's newton, then there's nothing we can do about it 16:40:07 P and O can be fixed though 16:40:23 if it's a problem in P and O 16:40:54 yeah, ocata onwards does the daemon reload when it stops/starts the service 16:41:00 I'm reading that it's a problem in >p, but that could be me 16:41:04 newton does not 16:41:09 looks like this sha is N 16:41:11 84ed68a4a57713c8a66aada1028dbbf8ffa1eb00 16:41:28 ohh 16:41:31 you're right 16:41:31 Anyway to get permission to patch? 16:41:46 nah, for RPC we'll have to fork and fix in the fork 16:41:47 to patch what? 16:41:53 newton 16:41:56 no 16:42:00 newton in the openstack namespace is gone 16:42:24 so 16:42:33 for me that's not clear if that's above N 16:42:40 I don't think it is. 16:42:42 ok 16:43:24 ok won't fix then 16:43:25 the notifies in https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/blob/newton-eol/tasks/neutron_init_systemd.yml look fine though 16:43:35 next 16:43:37 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1760878 16:43:38 Launchpad bug 1760878 in openstack-ansible "galera_server: Reveals galera passwords in task: "Create galera users"" [Undecided,New] 16:43:46 wow 16:43:48 that's bad 16:43:51 critical 16:43:58 I will do it tomorrow 16:44:19 hmm, I though I saw a patch already for that 16:44:47 I will see 16:44:51 no worries I handle it 16:45:04 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ia170e4f25e35984e68b4cd47c3d964a034236d11 16:45:10 next 16:45:10 confirmed 16:45:11 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1759896 16:45:13 Launchpad bug 1759896 in openstack-ansible "Placing certificate on keystone containers does not work" [Undecided,New] 16:45:32 odyssey4me: not the same task 16:45:37 mysql_user is the one 16:45:41 but yeah 16:45:42 ah ok 16:45:52 will do it 16:45:55 let's move on 16:45:57 15 minutes 16:45:59 :) 16:46:28 yeah, ssl on the back-end doesn't really work 16:46:33 confirmed, medium 16:46:36 ok 16:46:38 I do wish someone would work on that 16:46:45 anyone to look at it? 16:46:54 I think it'll be easier once the fastrouter is in though 16:47:01 ok next 16:47:05 #link #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1758144 16:47:06 Launchpad bug 1758144 in openstack-ansible "resolv.conf in containers set too late" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Logan V (loganv) 16:47:06 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1758144 16:47:21 it's assigned to logan let's move on 16:47:38 should it be set to confirmed? 16:47:39 except if logan- is there? 16:47:45 d34dh0r53: logan- has to confirm 16:47:52 We discussed this last week 16:47:56 next 16:47:58 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1755821 16:48:00 Launchpad bug 1755821 in openstack-ansible "config_template fails to parse template if it contains a comment with leading spaces" [High,New] - Assigned to Kevin Carter (kevin-carter) 16:48:06 ahh, ok 16:48:22 that's still in new state because we wanted to make sure cloudnull hasn't forgotten 16:48:29 I guess he has, so let's move on 16:48:38 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1743032 16:48:39 Launchpad bug 1743032 in openstack-ansible "Galera cluster maintenance in OpenStack-Ansible" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Kevin Carter (kevin-carter) 16:48:44 same 16:48:52 next 16:48:54 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1737827 16:48:56 Launchpad bug 1737827 in openstack-ansible "(ceph-client): setting 'nova_ceph_client' results in deployment where volumes can't be attached to VMs" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Andy McCrae (andrew-mccrae) 16:49:32 andymccr: ? 16:49:58 ahh i was waiting on response from the bug filer 16:50:06 ok 16:50:15 marking it incomplet 16:50:17 ok cool 16:50:23 i'll take another look at it though 16:50:30 unassigning 16:50:36 ok you can if you want :) 16:50:38 thanks 16:50:44 and thanks everyone for the triage 16:50:50 #topic open discussion 16:50:54 because we have extra time 16:51:00 open discussion 16:51:04 I have a topic! 16:51:08 234 BUGS 16:51:14 we've beaten our record. 16:51:26 nothing to be proud off. 16:51:29 that sounds bad:( 16:51:39 it is 16:51:55 :/ 16:54:14 I have nothing else to say. We have so many bugs, so many things pending. I am glad we are bringing new features and all, but at some point we need to look back and make sure our project is reliable and the experience is good. Not everyone is an expert that can quickly fix things. 16:54:29 agreed 16:54:32 yep, agreed 16:55:48 ok 16:55:51 that's all I had to say 16:56:23 anyone has anything to say ? 16:56:26 Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/queens: Add container/service clean up for ironic/trove https://review.openstack.org/559995 16:56:34 patches speak louder than words ;) 16:57:27 indeed 16:57:31 thanks everyone! 16:57:38 closing up 16:57:41 #endmeeting