16:00:03 <mnaser> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting
16:00:04 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun 19 16:00:03 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mnaser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:05 <nicolasbock> o/
16:00:06 <mnaser> #topic rollcall
16:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'
16:00:12 <evrardjp> o/
16:00:12 <mnaser> o/
16:00:15 <spotz> \o/
16:00:17 <andymccr> o/
16:00:47 <mnaser> while people check in, feel free to look over https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda and review 'last week highlights' if you have something to bring to the table :)
16:01:16 <evrardjp> mnaser: it would be better to write it here, so that's recorded in the minutes.
16:01:30 <mnaser> yes, i'll do that once i get to it, just wanted to give folks a chance to add something if they wanted to add :)
16:01:35 <mnaser> but i'll get us started
16:01:43 <mnaser> #topic what happened since last meeting
16:01:54 <mnaser> so i had a pretty productive weekend.
16:01:55 <mgariepy> o/
16:02:00 <evrardjp> mnaser: it looks so :0
16:02:02 <mnaser> the mess i made with missing epel packages is mostly cleaned up
16:02:02 <evrardjp> :)
16:02:17 <mnaser> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/576305/ this is one that might be one of the last
16:02:19 <ansmith> o/
16:02:35 <mnaser> so hopefully with that merged, we have very minimal epel dependency
16:02:49 <mnaser> also, i've worked with rdo and we just got a +1 from jenkins on the job to bring uwsgi into rocky
16:03:05 <mnaser> so keep an eye out on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/14240/ .. once that's in, we'll swap out some repos and we'll get uwsgi.
16:03:13 <mnaser> so: yay, that'll help hwoarang's work on distro packages
16:03:32 <mnaser> so, just got this message
16:03:34 <mnaser> amoralej> mnaser, uwsgi is now tagged in rocky-testing, it will be in the repos in next 15 minutes or so
16:03:35 <mnaser> yay!
16:03:44 <mnaser> anyways, next up, cleaning up ci jobs
16:04:17 <mnaser> you'll see me push a lot of changes, i'm hoping that we can adopt using project-templates rather than job inside every repo. it'll keep things a lot more consistent.  long term, i'd like to work on stabilizing our integrated repo jobs and run those against roles
16:04:30 <mnaser> so we don't have wild breakages.  we're still a bit far away from that, but that's something to work on
16:04:59 <mnaser> today a change merged to add percona repos to infra caches which means no more unreliable percona mirrors, yay.  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/576241/ adds that and it has passed, confirmed with infra that it's using it
16:05:31 <mnaser> and finally, nspawn jobs in integrated are failing, i added the fix but the jobs are broken and it's beyond my understanding.. so.. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/576307/ -- if anyone knows nspawn, please halp :)
16:05:46 <mnaser> that's it for me.  just wanted to get everyone up to date at what i've been up to.
16:05:51 <mnaser> anyone else? :)
16:06:04 <evrardjp> nothing to add
16:06:09 <spotz> I have my doc patch up from last week's triage
16:06:10 <andymccr> nice work on the percona bits!
16:06:15 <evrardjp> sorry pretty busy week :(
16:06:24 <mnaser> spotz: yay!  did it get a chance to get reviewed?
16:06:38 <mnaser> andymccr: thank you :)
16:06:49 <mnaser> evrardjp: no worries, you're keeping up with some good reviews so ++ :)
16:06:52 <spotz> mnaser: Not sure let me go find it:)
16:07:06 <jrosser> i got the Elastic perf monitor tool working with horizon/django, anyone who fancies appkying that to the back end api please go for it....
16:07:30 <tux_> Question folks, i am configuring F5 for OSAD so do i need to configure them to use SSL or non-SSL?
16:07:34 <mnaser> jrosser: i saw those patches, pretty sweet, wish i had time to hack on that :p
16:08:05 <mnaser> spotz: while you find the patch, we'll dive into bug triage and we can get back to it in open discussion :)
16:08:17 <mnaser> #topic bug triage
16:08:20 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777635
16:08:21 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777635 in openstack-ansible "lxc-veth-wiring fails to find interface" [Undecided,New]
16:08:41 <mnaser> "Unknown interface eth1"
16:09:24 <mnaser> looks like the submitter added more details
16:10:09 <mnaser> it looks like we're using "source-directory" and somehow that's not long supported, we need to use "source"
16:10:10 <tux_> cloudnull: or jamesdenton ^^
16:10:25 * mnaser looks at lxc_container_create quickly
16:10:28 <tux_> Any idea, should i set SSL or non SSL?
16:10:35 <openstackgerrit> Amy Marrich (spotz) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove IP range 1.2.3.4 from doc examples  https://review.openstack.org/574930
16:10:53 <spotz> :)
16:10:59 <mnaser> i wonder if the images recently changed?
16:11:25 <evrardjp> tux_: we are in a meeting, could we discuss this later?
16:11:52 <evrardjp> mnaser: do we see the version?
16:11:55 <evrardjp> is that master?
16:12:00 <mnaser> "This happens with Openstack-Ansible 16.0.13 and 17.0.4."
16:12:24 <tux_> evrardjp: sure, i can wait..
16:12:36 <mnaser> master uses systemd_network i think with the work cloudnull did
16:13:19 <evrardjp> yeah
16:13:28 <mnaser> i'm trying to see if we manage the /etc/network/interfaces file
16:13:51 <spotz> I know we used to but haven't looked at that bit in ages
16:14:06 <mnaser> i'm trying to dig quickly via github
16:14:10 <mnaser> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/tree/stable/queens
16:14:50 <mnaser> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/blob/stable/queens/tasks/lxc_container_config.yml#L119-L127
16:15:18 <mnaser> looks like we add things to interfaces.d
16:15:22 <mnaser> but we don't touch interfaces
16:15:53 <mnaser> we need more info, what's the best status to set it to?
16:16:08 <evrardjp> I am not convinced we have a bug yet, but I am not sure I have a full understanding of the bug.
16:16:13 <evrardjp> incomplete
16:16:18 <evrardjp> I agree
16:16:26 <evrardjp> with you, on the classification
16:16:41 <mnaser> cool
16:16:42 <mnaser> next
16:16:47 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777465
16:16:48 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777465 in openstack-ansible "Prepare the deployment host in OpenStack-Ansible" [Undecided,New]
16:17:14 <mnaser> hmm
16:17:19 <mnaser> pointing to a pip_install that doesn't exist?
16:17:27 <evrardjp> network issue?
16:17:42 <evrardjp> I tried 17.0.5 a few days ago I didn't get that.
16:17:49 <evrardjp> or was it .4?
16:17:53 <evrardjp> I can recheck if you like
16:17:58 <mnaser> .5
16:18:02 <mnaser> it seems like it's trying to checkout 407931dcfe5bd15153ddafc0d96467a7ae5b6524
16:18:05 <mnaser> which isnt a real commit
16:18:14 <evrardjp> yeah but
16:18:16 <evrardjp> why
16:18:18 <evrardjp> :p
16:18:45 <mnaser> maybe we tagged the wrong thing
16:18:51 <mnaser> let me verify
16:19:05 <evrardjp> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-pip_install/commit/407931dcfe5bd15153ddafc0d96467a7ae5b6524 is a commit
16:19:08 <evrardjp> it's fine
16:19:10 <evrardjp> and I tried it
16:19:19 <evrardjp> and it's gate tested :p
16:19:21 <mnaser> ok cool
16:19:25 <mnaser> invalid?
16:19:30 <evrardjp> yup
16:20:01 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777462
16:20:02 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777462 in openstack-ansible "tempest plugins should not be targetting master in stable branches" [Undecided,New]
16:20:07 * mnaser sighs
16:20:08 <mnaser> this one
16:20:22 <mnaser> i'm thinking we convince tempest to release a new version
16:20:29 <mnaser> and we drop the whole master stuff
16:20:30 <mnaser> thoughts?
16:21:00 <andymccr> i think we've had that chat
16:21:28 <mnaser> andymccr: what was the final verdict?
16:21:44 <andymccr> tl;dr - tempest wouldnt version because the tests should work against all versions
16:21:47 <andymccr> or something along those lines
16:21:54 <andymccr> perhaps that stance has changed
16:22:02 <mnaser> well
16:22:10 <mnaser> it doesnt work on all versions >:(
16:22:11 <mnaser> but yeah
16:22:14 <mnaser> i hear you about that
16:22:20 <andymccr> yeah i agree with that
16:22:26 <mnaser> i will assign to me and try to get a release out from tempest
16:22:28 <mnaser> and we can unpin that stuff
16:22:54 <mnaser> i'll try to convince them to push out 18.0.1 or something
16:23:08 <andymccr> sounds good
16:23:08 <mnaser> assigned to me
16:23:15 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777456
16:23:16 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777456 in openstack-ansible "Not possible to get all logs into syslog" [Undecided,New]
16:23:16 <andymccr> i imagine if there was a reason i dont see why they would block it
16:23:25 <mnaser> andymccr: yep esp when they broke their own rules, teehee.
16:23:41 <mnaser> hmm
16:24:19 <mnaser> that bug seems invalid to me because you can use rsyslog_client_user_defined_targets in your user_variables
16:24:35 <mnaser> assuming that's what the user means?
16:26:10 <mnaser> i'm not sure, i guess i'll put it down as incomplete and ask if `rsyslog_client_user_defined_targets` solves their issues [y/n]?
16:27:09 <mnaser> incomplete and added comment
16:27:22 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777403
16:27:23 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777403 in openstack-ansible "galera_server: configuration file name and path" [Undecided,New]
16:28:01 <mnaser> i think that is not an issue, because we use our own filesystem/config files rather than depending on upstream
16:28:22 <andymccr> hmm
16:28:43 <mnaser> cause we drop our own https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/blob/master/templates/my.cnf.j2
16:28:56 <andymccr> yeah we could ask if its actually causing an issue?
16:29:06 <andymccr> like to say "hey the file isnt name the same" isnt really an issue if everything runs correctly
16:29:10 <openstackgerrit> German Eichberger proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia master: [WIP] Adds the issuer to the CAs  https://review.openstack.org/576234
16:29:23 <mnaser> andymccr: yep, let me ask
16:29:55 <mnaser> andymccr: added comment, will set to 'incomplete' for now
16:30:03 <andymccr> sounds good
16:30:06 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777303
16:30:07 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777303 in openstack-ansible "rndc command not present on Centos 7" [Undecided,New]
16:30:53 <mnaser> looks like jrosser pushed up a fix
16:31:02 <andymccr> oh sweet
16:31:03 <evrardjp> for that one I think the deployer has to deal with the installation of the backend itself
16:31:11 <evrardjp> but that's good news
16:31:22 <mnaser> but centos doesn't seem to ship rndc in bind-utils
16:31:24 <evrardjp> mnaser: link to that fix?
16:31:32 <mnaser> but in bind instead
16:31:35 <mnaser> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/570353/7
16:31:46 <mnaser> but looks like in redhat-7.yaml we should s/bind-utils/bind/
16:32:11 <mnaser> pretty low hanging fruit, anyone wanna volunteer? :)
16:32:21 <evrardjp> come on ppl :)
16:32:24 <evrardjp> that's an easy fix!
16:32:40 <jrosser> i thought i handled all the distros? maybe forgot one?
16:32:41 <andymccr> go team go!
16:32:43 <evrardjp> you don't want mnaser to beat the commit count openstack world record, right?
16:32:55 <mnaser> jrosser: you did actually but apparently centos wants bind instead of bind-utils
16:32:57 <evrardjp> jrosser: different package needed :)
16:33:20 <jrosser> grrr :)
16:33:32 <mnaser> jrosser: if you're busy, i can push it up quickly
16:33:52 <jrosser> sure im on mobile right now
16:34:36 <mnaser> ok ill look into it
16:34:46 <mnaser> confirmed
16:34:50 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777254
16:34:51 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777254 in openstack-ansible "using ceph backend with lvm strategy leads to error" [Undecided,New]
16:35:18 <evrardjp> haha
16:35:20 <evrardjp> ok
16:35:22 <evrardjp> so...
16:35:38 <mnaser> i saw a patch about this today
16:35:40 <evrardjp> andymccr: has a patch, and I know the fixes for the failures of his patch.
16:35:50 <evrardjp> did I push it?
16:35:59 <evrardjp> I can't remember it, I was in a series of meetings.
16:36:13 <evrardjp> anyway
16:36:14 <andymccr> so yeah
16:36:15 <evrardjp> I will fix that.
16:36:19 <andymccr> that bug will only be fixed on master of ceph-ansible
16:36:24 <evrardjp> assign that to me.
16:36:36 <evrardjp> for backports, that's gonna be another thing.
16:36:37 <openstackgerrit> Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate master: Use correct package for CentOS rndc  https://review.openstack.org/576579
16:36:42 <mnaser> evrardjp: cool, done
16:36:48 <mnaser> let me know if you need help, ceph is important for me :-)
16:36:56 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777072
16:36:57 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777072 in openstack-ansible "In inventory/group_vars/repo_all.yml, internal_lb_vip_address needs to use ipwrap to handle IPv6" [Undecided,New]
16:37:04 <evrardjp> nah I figured it out, just need work.
16:37:09 <mnaser> coolios
16:37:19 <andymccr> its not really a ceph issue anyway ;P
16:37:28 <evrardjp> ok so
16:37:41 <evrardjp> for that one, I think I suggested that patch.
16:37:48 <evrardjp> to blinkniz
16:37:57 <evrardjp> blinkiz
16:38:11 <evrardjp> however, I think there is another patch of nicolasbock that should fix it in another way
16:38:19 <mnaser> so there are open fixes for that
16:38:21 <evrardjp> so that might become invalid.
16:38:24 <evrardjp> yeah
16:38:49 <mnaser> i see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574893/
16:39:06 <evrardjp> yeah the patch of nicolasbock :)
16:39:08 <mnaser> looks like it's in a merge conflict
16:39:17 <nicolasbock> The gate is having issues though
16:39:36 <nicolasbock> Yes, I'll fix that, but before then the gate checks kept running into seemingly unrelated issues
16:39:46 <mnaser> those should mostly be addressed
16:39:53 <nicolasbock> I'll rebase
16:40:04 <mnaser> i threw a recheck your way, any ci issues you have => reach out please :)
16:40:15 <nicolasbock> Ok, thanks!
16:40:23 <evrardjp> well rebase is needed anyway :p
16:40:33 <evrardjp> so for the bug
16:40:36 <mnaser> duplicate?
16:40:43 <evrardjp> duplicate would work.
16:40:46 <mnaser> of 1775621
16:40:51 <evrardjp> ofc
16:41:05 <mnaser> done
16:41:15 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1777066
16:41:16 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1777066 in openstack-ansible "os_cinder: Adding 'lvm' volume type fails: ERROR: No volumetype with a name or ID of 'lvm' exists" [Undecided,New]
16:41:25 <mnaser> yeah, i have no idea.
16:41:29 <mnaser> i tried to talk to the cinder team
16:41:31 <mnaser> they have no idea.
16:41:59 <evrardjp> hwoarang: are you there?
16:42:06 <mnaser> it's blocking os_cinder right now
16:42:07 <mnaser> and os_magnum
16:42:45 <evrardjp> probably worth checking in their documentation, to see if there are things that have changed, like deploy process change
16:42:55 <mnaser> i spoke with the ptl
16:42:57 <mnaser> nothing :(
16:43:02 <andymccr> is that exclusively broken for suse or for everything?
16:43:04 <mnaser> so i have no idea.  i'll do some more digging
16:43:06 <mnaser> everything andymccr
16:43:23 <mnaser> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575297/
16:43:26 <mnaser> all functional broken there
16:43:30 <andymccr> do the cinder role tests break too?
16:43:45 <mnaser> i think it's something that changed in cinder though. beacuse distro deploys still work
16:43:56 <mnaser> i'll have to work a bit more with their team
16:44:01 <evrardjp> yeah that's what I meant
16:44:12 <evrardjp> what do you mean nothing mnaser ?
16:44:22 <mnaser> according to them, no commits that should have affected that behaviour
16:44:37 <evrardjp> interestingly the upgrade works
16:44:41 <mnaser> at the expense of time, ill assign to me + confirmed and dig deeper, we got a few more to go through
16:44:47 <mnaser> type-set is where it breaks
16:44:57 <evrardjp> yeah, maybe that moved outside cinder cli?
16:45:00 <evrardjp> to openstack cli?
16:45:09 <mnaser> maybe we should use the openstack cli too
16:45:13 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1776944
16:45:14 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1776944 in openstack-ansible "horizon translations update playbook misses openstack_auth" [Undecided,New]
16:45:15 <evrardjp> or this can be used in an ansiblemodule?
16:45:29 <mnaser> evrardjp: that's an option too, probably the cleanest
16:45:49 <mnaser> that seems pretty easy fix
16:45:57 <evrardjp> the last bug seems important to me
16:46:07 <evrardjp> we have a job that's critical for us to make sure translations work
16:46:19 <evrardjp> if there is anything wrong, we should fix it.
16:46:35 <mnaser> evrardjp: ok cool.  it seems to be pretty straightforward fix of adding an extra item there
16:46:38 <evrardjp> andymccr: maybe you have an insight on this though?
16:47:06 <evrardjp> mnaser: if that's adding a folder into that list, yes :)
16:47:18 <evrardjp> but I am not sure about why it happened or it was missed
16:47:24 <mnaser> openstack_auth is a new thing afaik in queens
16:47:31 <andymccr> we run the script provided by horizon repo against the directories to update
16:47:39 <andymccr> im not sure if a new one is needed, but its an easy fix if that is the case
16:48:13 <mnaser> anyone volunteers to push up?
16:48:29 <evrardjp> andymccr: ? :p
16:48:37 <evrardjp> I am fixing your thing, you can fix mine :D
16:49:00 <evrardjp> (assuming this is "mine")
16:49:09 <evrardjp> (and the other was "yours")
16:49:14 <evrardjp> ok assign that to me mnaser
16:49:16 <andymccr> if eumel8 was around we could confirm
16:49:18 <evrardjp> I will fix that right now
16:49:29 <andymccr> oh i mean i can push a pr up in a sec if you want me to
16:50:05 <mnaser> i found andymccr easier than evrardjp so assigned to andymccr i'll follow the patch in ci :p
16:50:09 <andymccr> hahaha
16:50:11 <andymccr> ok cool
16:50:14 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1776902
16:50:15 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1776902 in openstack-ansible "galera_server: hardcoded database service name" [Undecided,New]
16:50:15 <spotz> hehe
16:50:35 <mnaser> hm
16:50:48 <mnaser> i mean.. we gate all this stuff so it works across suse/redhat/ubuntu
16:50:51 <mnaser> i'm inclined this is invalid
16:51:42 <mnaser> we always pull from upstream by default
16:51:51 <mnaser> this could be behaviour when not pulling from upstream
16:52:28 <openstackgerrit> Andy McCrae proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Add openstack_auth to translations update  https://review.openstack.org/576584
16:52:36 <evrardjp> lol andymccr
16:52:38 <openstackgerrit> Jean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: [WIP] Add the openstack_auth folder to translations  https://review.openstack.org/576585
16:52:54 <mnaser> ok, marked that one as incomplete. added comment asking if they're using distro pkgs
16:52:58 <andymccr> tbh, it makes sense i checked the directory tree from horizon
16:53:04 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1776818
16:53:05 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1776818 in openstack-ansible "Unknown lvalue 'PrivateUsers' in section 'Service'" [Undecided,New]
16:53:10 <evrardjp> I had an ssh key issue so that was uploaded after a few reconnections, what's your excuse for a patch happening so late?
16:53:27 <andymccr> evrardjp: i checked whether its needed and didnt do a WIP :P
16:53:43 <andymccr> mine is PRODUCTION READY
16:53:43 <mnaser> cloudnull isn't around but maybe when he is, he can comment on that one.
16:53:52 <andymccr> yeah that is a weird one
16:54:03 <mnaser> only thing i'll ask is
16:54:09 <mnaser> if it's causing warnings or failing
16:54:11 <andymccr> yeah
16:54:16 <andymccr> what is the downside
16:54:22 <evrardjp> mnaser: worth asking indeed
16:54:27 <mnaser> incomplete, asked
16:54:31 <andymccr> without htat even if we did push a PR im not sure how we'd know if its better or fixed
16:54:33 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1776799
16:54:34 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1776799 in openstack-ansible "Instance can ping gw and google, but Fails to Reach Metadata server with ODL+OVS" [Undecided,New]
16:54:59 * mnaser doesn't know anything about ODL
16:55:31 <andymccr> hahaha
16:55:37 <andymccr> judging by the silence neither do we :(
16:55:39 <evrardjp> welcome tot he club mnaser
16:55:59 <evrardjp> you could assign this to manuel buil?
16:56:14 <mnaser> mbuil?
16:56:17 <evrardjp> yeah
16:56:25 <mnaser> hopefully he can help him
16:56:29 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1776606
16:56:29 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1776606 in openstack-ansible "qemu-kvm missing on new compute hosts" [Undecided,New]
16:56:53 <mnaser> ocata bug gr
16:57:03 <mnaser> if qemu-kvm is not installed
16:57:07 <mnaser> no vm would ever get booted..
16:57:50 <mnaser> i'll ask for compute node deploy logs if possible
16:57:54 <mnaser> it'll help us troubleshoot
16:58:12 <evrardjp> Tahvok: are you there?
16:58:20 <evrardjp> that's your bug :)
16:58:56 <mnaser> incomplete, asking for logs
16:59:02 <mnaser> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1775873
16:59:03 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1775873 in openstack-ansible "gnocchi missing configuration to use ceph backend" [Undecided,New]
16:59:24 <mnaser> eh, it probably needs ceph_client to run on it
16:59:46 <mnaser> i dont have bandwidth to look into that right now, but it's very much confirmed, i've seen it before
16:59:54 <andymccr> yeah id believe that
16:59:59 <evrardjp> didn't we see that last week?
17:00:06 <mnaser> i feel like we did
17:00:06 <mnaser> lol
17:00:11 <evrardjp> haha
17:00:29 <evrardjp> sorry I haven't checked last week logs
17:00:40 <mnaser> anyways, set to confirmed, hopefully someone can pick it up.. asked them if they would like to help us fix it
17:00:59 <mnaser> we're over time but
17:01:02 <mnaser> #topic open discussion
17:01:06 <mnaser> spotz: pushed up a fix for docs?
17:01:20 <spotz> yeah
17:01:33 <mnaser> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574930/2
17:01:44 <mnaser> it LGTM and passes ci
17:02:20 <mnaser> i'll also ask to keep eyes out on https://review.openstack.org/#/q/starredby:mnaser@vexxhost.com .. i'm always pushing stuff up and they're small and easy and ready to merge most of the time
17:02:23 <mnaser> anyone has anything else? :)
17:03:02 <evrardjp> done
17:03:19 <evrardjp> I can't chair next meeting :(
17:03:21 <evrardjp> again
17:03:22 <mnaser> ETIMEOUT
17:03:24 <mnaser> #topic next chair
17:03:35 <mnaser> i can do it unless someone really feels like they want to ;)
17:04:05 <mnaser> i'll chair the next one
17:04:35 <mnaser> thanks for coming evrardjp andymccr spotz nicolasbock jrosser ansmith mgariepy
17:04:43 <mnaser> #endmeeting