16:01:23 <mnaser> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:01:24 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun 18 16:01:23 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnaser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:27 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:01:30 <mnaser> #topic office hours 16:01:32 <mnaser> \o/ 16:01:39 <raukadah> \o/ 16:01:41 <mnaser> evrardjp: is there a tool that you use to do the sha bumps? 16:01:49 <mnaser> we need to do one last sha bump to include the rabbitmq fixes 16:02:41 <evrardjp> mnaser: yes and it should be documented nowadays :) 16:02:44 <mnaser> i cant find any tooling or anything 16:02:51 <mnaser> inside ./scripts anyways 16:03:03 <evrardjp> that's because it's not there :) 16:03:12 <evrardjp> it's branch independent 16:03:22 <noonedeadpunk> o/ 16:03:32 <evrardjp> just a sec 16:03:45 <mnaser> we should probably make it live there so it's easily maintainable but yeeeah 16:03:50 <evrardjp> https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/contributor/periodic-work.html#releasing 16:03:52 <mnaser> i think we're probably ready for release 16:04:04 <guilhermesp> o/ 16:04:35 <evrardjp> what do you want to bump ? 16:04:41 <evrardjp> the roles? 16:04:50 <evrardjp> (it looks like it when I read that comment) 16:05:02 <mnaser> yeah 16:05:06 <mnaser> (im gonna try and see if i can do it :p) 16:05:09 <evrardjp> that would be, with said tooling... 16:05:13 <evrardjp> go into your osa folder 16:05:23 <evrardjp> then osa releases bump_role $branchname 16:05:32 <evrardjp> roles* 16:05:51 <mnaser> oh this will take a little while i guess 16:06:07 <evrardjp> yes I haven't converted to asyncio yet 16:06:22 <evrardjp> I have a few bugs open on this tooling 16:06:27 <evrardjp> :) 16:06:30 <mnaser> all good :) 16:06:37 <mnaser> so with the bump which includes the rabbitmq regression 16:06:40 <mnaser> i think this is pretty much it 16:06:44 <mnaser> i don't think there is another major 16:06:46 <mnaser> thoughts? 16:06:52 <evrardjp> nope that's all I heard recently 16:07:02 <mnaser> i forgot to do closes-bug on that bug oops 16:07:04 <evrardjp> but be aware there is a bump I did yesterday? 16:07:13 <mnaser> evrardjp: yep but the change was merged today :< 16:07:18 <noonedeadpunk> I think we probably need https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665595/ 16:07:19 <evrardjp> oh got it 16:07:39 <noonedeadpunk> for the next bump I mean 16:07:56 <mnaser> that's probably not release blocking 16:08:00 <mnaser> only affecting ci afaik, right? 16:08:13 <noonedeadpunk> oh, yep, sure 16:08:14 <evrardjp> yup 16:09:11 <evrardjp> on that doc page I linked above, you have everything you need for releasing, we just need to be aware of a few gotchas with new-release for older branches, but the new branches are now super clean. 16:09:13 <logan-> which rmq fix? the recreating users every time thing merged in rocky now right? 16:09:45 <mnaser> logan-: nope, we started using the rabbitmq that ships with rdo which is 3.6 16:09:51 <logan-> oh that one gotcha 16:09:56 <mnaser> but we had 3.7 before 16:10:04 <mnaser> and i got weird stuff about 3.6 in here anyways 16:10:35 <openstackgerrit> Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/stein: Bump SHAs for stable/stein https://review.opendev.org/666039 16:10:47 <mnaser> ^ so thats pretty much it 16:11:00 <noonedeadpunk> I think I may place release if that's appropriate now 16:11:04 <mnaser> so who wants to have fun doing release (with a depends on that change?) 16:11:23 <mnaser> noonedeadpunk: yes, i think so, can you use that commit (6b9f13086d4bea179c05d78b5f7317bd056e3381) with a depends-on ? :D 16:11:38 <noonedeadpunk> yep, sure 16:11:54 <logan-> nice 16:12:48 <noonedeadpunk> ok, will place it right after the meeting 16:13:00 <evrardjp> well you'll need for this to merge first 16:13:11 <mnaser> yeah we can recheck it, but at least the change will be there 16:13:11 <evrardjp> depends on doesn't work within release repo 16:13:13 <evrardjp> :) 16:13:50 <logan-> jrosser is that ceph backend name thing you found yesterday something we'll need to create an upgrade playbook for in stein to cinder-manage migrate the volume hostnames? 16:14:21 <jrosser> logan-: it might need to be done in the os_cinder role possibly 16:14:36 <logan-> def not a release blocker imo but it'll be something to keep on the radar because it sounds like it breaks rbd cinder backends during R->S 16:15:35 <evrardjp> so mnaser, final rc? 16:15:51 <noonedeadpunk> evrardjp: so for the final rc I should take this exact bump? 16:16:04 <mnaser> the only thing it breaks is volumes might not actually be deleteable/createable/etc 16:16:11 <evrardjp> yes. you should take that merged sha 16:16:14 <mnaser> what we could do is a reno note 16:16:23 <evrardjp> that's a good idea mnaser 16:16:32 <mnaser> and then that way we don't have to wait till it gets fixed or whatever 16:16:40 <mnaser> let me do one right now so we can iterate on it 16:16:43 <evrardjp> ok 16:16:50 <mgariepy> also not being able to edit attachment. 16:16:59 <evrardjp> noonedeadpunk: so let's wait for those two patches then: the bump and the reno 16:18:10 <noonedeadpunk> sounds nice. But probably I'll place than tomorrow in the morning - it might be rpetty late when patches will land 16:18:37 <evrardjp> yup. I can vote on those, wednesday is my releases review day 16:21:24 <openstackgerrit> Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: release: added release note for ceph backend issue https://review.opendev.org/666043 16:21:26 <mnaser> ^ quick draft 16:21:39 <noonedeadpunk> Am I right, that for other branches I should take previous bump, not recent ones like https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665544/1 ? 16:22:23 <evrardjp> we can discuss that after the meeting 16:22:53 <evrardjp> but basically the sha of the repo just before that one lands 16:23:36 <noonedeadpunk> oh, yep, right 16:25:55 <mnaser> let me know what everyone thinks about the cinder release note i guess 16:27:26 <evrardjp> if nobody is talking I would like to discuss about something 16:28:05 <mnaser> i think the cinder thing is ok, ill backport after and bump again 16:28:07 <mnaser> sure evrardjp 16:28:18 <evrardjp> I think OSA would benefit for some of the deliverables done in a (possible) new SIG: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/containers-sig 16:28:32 <evrardjp> The first one, particularily. 16:29:10 <evrardjp> Even if the scope of the SIG isn't really for OSA, I think it's nice to share 16:29:27 <evrardjp> I would love seeing someone from OSA involved there 16:29:43 <mnaser> ya i like that, so we can just rely on bindep to pull down binaries 16:29:50 <mnaser> or rather like the list of packages to install 16:29:50 <evrardjp> correct 16:30:16 <mnaser> i def think we should try to be part of that. i don't want to spread myself too thin though.. anyone? :> 16:30:36 <evrardjp> you can still write your name, and when it's about action items, delegate later. 16:30:49 <evrardjp> or bring the items back here, and decide with the community :) 16:31:28 <noonedeadpunk> I'd love to, but I'm not sure how big expert on this topic I am:( 16:34:59 <evrardjp> I don't have other things to say on that topic 16:36:50 <jrosser> openstack foundation at the EBU Network Technology Seminar today https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/YjJw2VKw/EBU-NTS.jpg 16:40:44 <jrosser> we'll be doing a demo there tomorrow using an OSA based cloud so thankyou to mnaser for lining up the intros for us in Denver that enabled this to happen 16:41:32 <guilhermesp> ++ that's nice jrosser 16:41:48 <guilhermesp> will it be streammed ? 16:43:17 <jrosser> i'm not sure if the videos are for EBU members only, i'll check 16:45:20 <mnaser> oooooou nice jrosser :D 16:45:39 <mnaser> happy to see that actually made it somewhere neat 16:49:21 <evrardjp> : ) 16:56:45 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: release: added release note for ceph backend issue https://review.opendev.org/666043 16:56:57 <openstackgerrit> Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/stein: release: added release note for ceph backend issue https://review.opendev.org/666056 16:57:02 <mnaser> ^ 16:57:17 <mnaser> lets get that merged and do a 2nd bump 17:02:43 <openstackgerrit> Dirk Mueller proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add aio_metal and aio_distro_metal openSUSE 15 jobs https://review.opendev.org/666058 17:04:00 <mnaser> #endmeeting