16:01:23 #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:01:24 Meeting started Tue Jun 18 16:01:23 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnaser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:27 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:01:30 #topic office hours 16:01:32 \o/ 16:01:39 \o/ 16:01:41 evrardjp: is there a tool that you use to do the sha bumps? 16:01:49 we need to do one last sha bump to include the rabbitmq fixes 16:02:41 mnaser: yes and it should be documented nowadays :) 16:02:44 i cant find any tooling or anything 16:02:51 inside ./scripts anyways 16:03:03 that's because it's not there :) 16:03:12 it's branch independent 16:03:22 o/ 16:03:32 just a sec 16:03:45 we should probably make it live there so it's easily maintainable but yeeeah 16:03:50 https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/contributor/periodic-work.html#releasing 16:03:52 i think we're probably ready for release 16:04:04 o/ 16:04:35 what do you want to bump ? 16:04:41 the roles? 16:04:50 (it looks like it when I read that comment) 16:05:02 yeah 16:05:06 (im gonna try and see if i can do it :p) 16:05:09 that would be, with said tooling... 16:05:13 go into your osa folder 16:05:23 then osa releases bump_role $branchname 16:05:32 roles* 16:05:51 oh this will take a little while i guess 16:06:07 yes I haven't converted to asyncio yet 16:06:22 I have a few bugs open on this tooling 16:06:27 :) 16:06:30 all good :) 16:06:37 so with the bump which includes the rabbitmq regression 16:06:40 i think this is pretty much it 16:06:44 i don't think there is another major 16:06:46 thoughts? 16:06:52 nope that's all I heard recently 16:07:02 i forgot to do closes-bug on that bug oops 16:07:04 but be aware there is a bump I did yesterday? 16:07:13 evrardjp: yep but the change was merged today :< 16:07:18 I think we probably need https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665595/ 16:07:19 oh got it 16:07:39 for the next bump I mean 16:07:56 that's probably not release blocking 16:08:00 only affecting ci afaik, right? 16:08:13 oh, yep, sure 16:08:14 yup 16:09:11 on that doc page I linked above, you have everything you need for releasing, we just need to be aware of a few gotchas with new-release for older branches, but the new branches are now super clean. 16:09:13 which rmq fix? the recreating users every time thing merged in rocky now right? 16:09:45 logan-: nope, we started using the rabbitmq that ships with rdo which is 3.6 16:09:51 oh that one gotcha 16:09:56 but we had 3.7 before 16:10:04 and i got weird stuff about 3.6 in here anyways 16:10:35 Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/stein: Bump SHAs for stable/stein https://review.opendev.org/666039 16:10:47 ^ so thats pretty much it 16:11:00 I think I may place release if that's appropriate now 16:11:04 so who wants to have fun doing release (with a depends on that change?) 16:11:23 noonedeadpunk: yes, i think so, can you use that commit (6b9f13086d4bea179c05d78b5f7317bd056e3381) with a depends-on ? :D 16:11:38 yep, sure 16:11:54 nice 16:12:48 ok, will place it right after the meeting 16:13:00 well you'll need for this to merge first 16:13:11 yeah we can recheck it, but at least the change will be there 16:13:11 depends on doesn't work within release repo 16:13:13 :) 16:13:50 jrosser is that ceph backend name thing you found yesterday something we'll need to create an upgrade playbook for in stein to cinder-manage migrate the volume hostnames? 16:14:21 logan-: it might need to be done in the os_cinder role possibly 16:14:36 def not a release blocker imo but it'll be something to keep on the radar because it sounds like it breaks rbd cinder backends during R->S 16:15:35 so mnaser, final rc? 16:15:51 evrardjp: so for the final rc I should take this exact bump? 16:16:04 the only thing it breaks is volumes might not actually be deleteable/createable/etc 16:16:11 yes. you should take that merged sha 16:16:14 what we could do is a reno note 16:16:23 that's a good idea mnaser 16:16:32 and then that way we don't have to wait till it gets fixed or whatever 16:16:40 let me do one right now so we can iterate on it 16:16:43 ok 16:16:50 also not being able to edit attachment. 16:16:59 noonedeadpunk: so let's wait for those two patches then: the bump and the reno 16:18:10 sounds nice. But probably I'll place than tomorrow in the morning - it might be rpetty late when patches will land 16:18:37 yup. I can vote on those, wednesday is my releases review day 16:21:24 Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: release: added release note for ceph backend issue https://review.opendev.org/666043 16:21:26 ^ quick draft 16:21:39 Am I right, that for other branches I should take previous bump, not recent ones like https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665544/1 ? 16:22:23 we can discuss that after the meeting 16:22:53 but basically the sha of the repo just before that one lands 16:23:36 oh, yep, right 16:25:55 let me know what everyone thinks about the cinder release note i guess 16:27:26 if nobody is talking I would like to discuss about something 16:28:05 i think the cinder thing is ok, ill backport after and bump again 16:28:07 sure evrardjp 16:28:18 I think OSA would benefit for some of the deliverables done in a (possible) new SIG: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/containers-sig 16:28:32 The first one, particularily. 16:29:10 Even if the scope of the SIG isn't really for OSA, I think it's nice to share 16:29:27 I would love seeing someone from OSA involved there 16:29:43 ya i like that, so we can just rely on bindep to pull down binaries 16:29:50 or rather like the list of packages to install 16:29:50 correct 16:30:16 i def think we should try to be part of that. i don't want to spread myself too thin though.. anyone? :> 16:30:36 you can still write your name, and when it's about action items, delegate later. 16:30:49 or bring the items back here, and decide with the community :) 16:31:28 I'd love to, but I'm not sure how big expert on this topic I am:( 16:34:59 I don't have other things to say on that topic 16:36:50 openstack foundation at the EBU Network Technology Seminar today https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/YjJw2VKw/EBU-NTS.jpg 16:40:44 we'll be doing a demo there tomorrow using an OSA based cloud so thankyou to mnaser for lining up the intros for us in Denver that enabled this to happen 16:41:32 ++ that's nice jrosser 16:41:48 will it be streammed ? 16:43:17 i'm not sure if the videos are for EBU members only, i'll check 16:45:20 oooooou nice jrosser :D 16:45:39 happy to see that actually made it somewhere neat 16:49:21 : ) 16:56:45 Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: release: added release note for ceph backend issue https://review.opendev.org/666043 16:56:57 Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder stable/stein: release: added release note for ceph backend issue https://review.opendev.org/666056 16:57:02 ^ 16:57:17 lets get that merged and do a 2nd bump 17:02:43 Dirk Mueller proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add aio_metal and aio_distro_metal openSUSE 15 jobs https://review.opendev.org/666058 17:04:00 #endmeeting