16:06:26 <noonedeadpunk> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting
16:06:27 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb 25 16:06:26 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:06:28 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:06:30 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'
16:06:33 <noonedeadpunk> #topic office hours
16:08:25 <cyberpear> Is this the same group of folks who maintain the `os_*` ansible modules, or is this just the roles/playbooks for installing/managing OpenStack?
16:08:32 <openstackgerrit> Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [WIP] Centos-8 support  https://review.opendev.org/689629
16:09:17 <noonedeadpunk> cyberpear: second option:) you can join #openstack-ansible-sig - there you can find ansible modules maintainers as well
16:09:18 <cjloader> o/
16:09:29 <noonedeadpunk> o/
16:09:31 <cyberpear> thx!
16:12:32 <jrosser> o/
16:13:34 <noonedeadpunk> ok, so what do we have, except everything being broken?:)
16:24:12 <openstackgerrit> Duncan Martin Walker proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops master: Allow non-url Elastic gpg key specification  https://review.opendev.org/709732
16:27:24 <jrosser> so we have a bunch of things going on - centos8 WIP support is here https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:osa/el8
16:29:11 <jrosser> then about to merge switching debian stretch to buster on master https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:buster_functional+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
16:29:22 <jrosser> that will likley break a few things
16:30:17 <jrosser> and a reasonable view of the things that need working on is here https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:openstack/openstack-ansible-tests/sync-tests+status:open
16:30:43 <noonedeadpunk> yeah this is lot of work ^
16:31:43 <jrosser> there will be some common things - need to fix the pre-run cleanup stuff into the tests repo
16:31:54 <noonedeadpunk> btw, what do we think about https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709457/ ?
16:31:55 <jrosser> thats breaking a bunch of those roles
16:33:02 <noonedeadpunk> regarding suse personally I don't feel right now that it takes a lot of time for it's maintennce
16:35:15 <jrosser> it would be nice for someone to be getting the things currently broken to be working, but that needs a contributor to come forward
16:36:12 <noonedeadpunk> yes, agreed. But in case we remove like CI, it means we stop supporting it. And currently CI is working, at least for source installs
16:36:23 <noonedeadpunk> we can kinda drop distro ones
16:36:57 <noonedeadpunk> maybe it's worth calling for interested parties in ML
16:37:16 <noonedeadpunk> as we currently have no idea if suse is used and how widely
16:38:06 <jrosser> i think https://review.opendev.org/689629 fails on virtualenv again
16:38:26 <CeeMac> hi jrosser
16:38:34 <jrosser> Hi CeeMac
16:38:41 <noonedeadpunk> yeah. that's true.....
16:40:50 <CeeMac> jrosser: if you get a few spare minutes I don't suppose you'd mind peeking into the neutron channel at my epic question?  I've hit a brick wall.  no rush, i'm about to head out for the day but wouldn't mind a chat tomorrow if you've any ideas
16:42:23 <jrosser> CeeMac: this is OVS?
16:42:45 <CeeMac> it is
16:42:51 <CeeMac> oh, you dont' ovs yet do you?
16:42:57 <jrosser> no i dont
16:43:20 <CeeMac> ah well, never mind then :D
16:43:26 <jrosser> though the good mr jamesdenton is always a good source of tips
16:43:30 <CeeMac> unless you can see any issues generally
16:43:42 <CeeMac> yeah, i'll hit him up later :)
16:44:07 <CeeMac> not sure if its  a port security / matching pairs issue or something more fundamental
16:46:52 <spotz> Yeah if it's a networking question it's almost always worth waiting to catch jamesdenton
17:06:14 <noonedeadpunk> #endmeeting