16:08:19 <noonedeadpunk> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:08:20 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 5 16:08:19 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:08:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:08:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:08:27 <noonedeadpunk> #topic office hours 16:08:53 <noonedeadpunk> hey everyone 16:10:45 <noonedeadpunk> so, we haven't done any release for some time, because of the broken gates. 16:11:02 <noonedeadpunk> and this is kinda problem as there are plenty changes to tag... 16:11:17 <openstackgerrit> Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Drop support for openSUSE https://review.opendev.org/725541 16:11:32 <noonedeadpunk> ^ this is the second topic 16:12:19 <noonedeadpunk> oh, btw, train bump has passed, would be great to merge it https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725115/ 16:15:52 <noonedeadpunk> Since opensuse is really failing more and more often in CI (mostly keystone tests) and we don't have much resources and help from interesting parties, we mark suse as experimental for U cycle and aimed to drop support for V 16:17:32 <noonedeadpunk> jrosser: did great job on lets encrypt and haproxy stuff - reviews are welcome https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:certbot-ha+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 16:17:51 <jrosser> o/ 16:21:15 <noonedeadpunk> Also I have seconds thoughts that I probably have booked too much slots for virtual ptg.... 16:21:41 <noonedeadpunk> what do you think? 16:22:48 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server master: Ensure git package is present for centos https://review.opendev.org/725505 16:22:49 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server master: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.opendev.org/725594 16:23:37 <jrosser> noonedeadpunk: do you have a link? can't find it.... 16:24:19 * noonedeadpunk looking 16:25:15 <noonedeadpunk> oh, btw, ptg registration is live:) 16:25:32 <noonedeadpunk> https://ethercalc.openstack.org/126u8ek25noy 16:27:35 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/126u8ek25noy 16:29:01 <jrosser> maybe at the end of the first session we can see how much more if any is needed 16:29:11 <jrosser> it's going to be quite different 16:29:50 <noonedeadpunk> Yeah, that's true 16:30:28 <noonedeadpunk> Like on last event I was (in Berlin) - there was tons of interest from ppl and room was totally full 16:30:44 <noonedeadpunk> but have no idea what going to happen here 16:30:54 <jrosser> denver was relatively quiet 16:31:16 <jrosser> we should think about when to branch 16:31:36 <jrosser> but also we have a giant pile of stuff to merge what with the gate being broken for so long 16:31:36 <noonedeadpunk> that is good question actually 16:32:24 <noonedeadpunk> oh, projects already had brnached 16:32:25 <jrosser> i was just looking.... and this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/723276/ make everything go very green indeed 16:33:11 <noonedeadpunk> you mean we may leave suse ? :P 16:33:15 <jrosser> noonedeadpunk: yeah so i figure we need to be careful about bumping master SHA for upstream stuff or requirements, things could go strange 16:33:42 <noonedeadpunk> yep. I think we should actually branch as well... 16:33:47 <jrosser> but theres a process here isnt there 16:34:13 <noonedeadpunk> eventually we can bump things back to U anytime 16:34:26 <jrosser> if we can merge them :) 16:34:35 <noonedeadpunk> but yeah, we might face with unnecessary issues 16:35:13 <noonedeadpunk> So we have 2 ways at least - not bump master, or branch and backport... 16:35:53 <noonedeadpunk> or set U as trackbranch and bump U on master 16:37:43 <jrosser> well maybe we have this week to try to merge stuff then branch 16:37:48 <jrosser> see how much we can fix 16:38:11 <jrosser> the galera stuff is annoying, do you know what is wrong there currently? 16:39:10 <noonedeadpunk> currently at package conflict when both vrepo versions are defined 16:40:01 <noonedeadpunk> but not really sure I see how to resolve this except disable CI for client 16:42:18 <noonedeadpunk> ah... for some reason I thought that we've figured out what's wrong with the server... 16:42:53 <noonedeadpunk> yeah, that is weird https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/17219f8e49ab482599d8c13a2c3c2912/log/job-output.txt#4544 16:44:36 <noonedeadpunk> btw I was thining to drop fedora-latest on stable branches for hardening 16:55:59 <jrosser> yes i agree with that 16:56:22 <jrosser> it is too much of a moving target, and also moving target on the stable branches which is really sad 16:57:08 <jrosser> for galera i wonder if we should modify the galera_client role to only install the repo if galera_server has not already done it 16:59:08 <spatel> does OSA ready for CentOS 8 ? 16:59:45 <spatel> I am planning to deploy my new datacenter cloud using CentOS8 so want to make sure i am not doing something which is impossible. 17:07:52 <noonedeadpunk> #endmeeting